The Principle

[HenryDorsetCase]

Poor old Kate Mulgrew had to issue a statement saying "Oh Crikey, I had no idea I was involved in ths bollocks, sorry guys, and Star Trek fans."

[HenryDorsetCase]

I'll wait and see. We're all spinning around something.

Dude, do you even cosmology?

[mashman]

Dude, do you even cosmology?

No, I'm a programmer.

[oldrider]

Whats God been up since he created the Universe?

Keep it dark but seeing as you asked ... I have been relaxing out here in "God's own" logging onto KB and checking on my work from time to time!

[Voltaire]

"She", you idiot. Wear gumboots and carry a lightning rod. Please note people, it's a "lightning" rod, not a "lightening" rod. The concept of a "lightening rod" makes my brain fire off in so many directions at once that I can't form a coherent position on what one may actually be.

And that's why so many of the Irish Round Towers have no cap as they were hit by lightning.God could have been a woman is there looked to be a fair bit of multitasking involved.
Anyways back to changing bullet points to tick boxes .....

[bogan]

"She", you idiot. Wear gumboots and carry a lightning rod. Please note people, it's a "lightning" rod, not a "lightening" rod. The concept of a "lightening rod" makes my brain fire off in so many directions at once that I can't form a coherent position on what one may actually be.

Perhaps it is a rod used to lighten a dark place? Or a shorter form of enlightening rod, as in, we need a stout rod to forcibly enlighten these muppets who produced such drivel that is in no way representative of the viewpoints of those 'interviewed'.

[bogan]

No, I'm a programmer.

So...

bool answer = mashman.cosmology.get();

??

[mashman]

So...

bool answer = mashman.cosmology.get();

??

Cannot implicitly convert type string to bool

[bogan]

Cannot implicitly convert type string to bool

I you're not storing it as a bool, you should at least have an overloaded return type for the get() function.

mashman.getgudatyourjob()

[mashman]

I you're not storing it as a bool, you should at least have an overloaded return type for the get() function.

Overloaded get functions are unnecessary. You should have used a property instead.

[Erelyes]

Ha sukaz I aint seen da principel snce I dropt owt

[rustyrobot]

Overloaded get functions are unnecessary. You should have used a property instead.

It's all geek to me

[bogan]

Overloaded get functions are unnecessary. You should have used a property instead.

I had the return type as bool, don't come complaining to me cos your one returned a string...

some say we may be getting off topic, but a geocentrist would say as long as it is still about me, we're absolutely on topic right?

Speaking of unfortunate strings...

[Banditbandit]

It's all geek to me

Beware of Geeks bearing gifs ...

[Voltaire]

Beware of Geeks bearing gifs ...

makes Franken sense.