Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 54

Thread: Cx400C

  1. #31
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by dangerous View Post
    BOLLICKS

    ok lts not bring the vf 750 into this thread... it deserves one of its own.

    now in my experance of owning near all cx modles:
    A, manual camchain adjustment... fultless, 100k +
    B, manual camchain adjustment... fultless 100k+
    C, manual camchain adjustment... fultless (same engine as B)
    E, Auto camchain adjustment... issues, due to adjuster not allowing much adjustment, replaced every 7000km (did 3)
    TC, Auto camchain adjustment... faultless 40k+ and thrashed
    What bollocks that there was never a problem? Im 56 years old but alzheimers has not yet quite claimed my sanity.

    Am I imagining all of the hundreds ( yes hundreds ) of CX500s that I and the mechanics working alongside CONSTANTLY repaired during my five years in London commencing in the early 80s? Many of those requiring new cam chains and followers at alarmingly low odometer readings. There were lots of these in the UK, many ridden by despatch riders. Many of those despatch riders rigidly followed the Honda mandated service intervals.

    I think a sampling rate in London over many bikes will have far more credibility than your realtively limited experience

    Yes you are right the VF750FD deserves a ( very long ) thread of its own, yet another long horror story from a company that so often has the temerity/ hypocrisy to say it builds reliable product

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  2. #32
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Revhead View Post
    So you are saying that due to frequent checks and adjustment you can avoid the damage.

    The factory had several goes at fixing it until they went to the auto adjuster.
    there was not and never were any issues with the CX manual camchain tensioner (i do not know much about the series 1 A prototype from 79)

    Like ya drive chain the less you adjust the longer it will last


    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Am I imagining all of the hundreds ( yes hundreds ) of CX500s that I and the mechanics working alongside CONSTANTLY repaired during my five years in London commencing in the early 80s? Many of those requiring new cam chains and followers at alarmingly low odometer readings. I think a sampling rate in London over many bikes will have far more credibility than your realtively limited experience
    just noted ya post so adding and editing to this one.

    Well I do not doubt what you say... but here in NZ apart from the early 79er maybe there were no issues that I know of with manual tensioners, I put over 100k on two bikes another 100 on three others, I know the old guy that has one of mine and its near 150k now, and never touched apart from my rebuild a 8000k due to a prang spliting the oil pump after the forks were pushed back into the engine.
    Here it wasnt till the auto tensioners came out in 82 with the cbx, cx ect that there were issues.. but then there will be some talk about the xl/xr 750k etc.
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  3. #33
    Join Date
    30th August 2013 - 18:59
    Bike
    1982 Honda CX500
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    54
    Well that goes against all that the rest of the worlds experiences and records.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    What bollocks that there was never a problem? Im 56 years old but alzheimers has not yet quite claimed my sanity.
    They never had problems ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Am I imagining all of the hundreds ( yes hundreds ) of CX500s that I and the mechanics working alongside CONSTANTLY repaired during my five years in London commencing in the early 80s? Many of those requiring new cam chains and followers at alarmingly low odometer readings. There were lots of these in the UK, many ridden by despatch riders. Many of those despatch riders rigidly followed the Honda mandated service intervals.
    Perhaps the dispatch riders (in London) rode the CX's a little differently to those that owned and rode them in NZ. It's not KM's ridden that made the difference ... it's HOW they were ridden.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    I think a sampling rate in London over many bikes will have far more credibility than your realtively limited experience
    A "Sampling" of all CX dispatch riders in London you mean ... ??? it's hardly a fair comparison to those owned/ridden on the open road (even by kiwi courier riders) in NZ.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Yes you are right the VF750FD deserves a ( very long ) thread of its own, yet another long horror story from a company that so often has the temerity/ hypocrisy to say it builds reliable product
    There's still plenty of VF's and CX's STILL on the road. (Some did make it home though .. )
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  5. #35
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Revhead View Post
    Well that goes against all that the rest of the worlds experiences and records.
    I KNOW maybe NZ modles were corected... I rode one of mine for 300k and 160kph with out water in the red due to a blowen pump seal... warped the rear inner casing and still ran like a dream

    remember tho as I said my 500E with auto tensioner went through a tensioner n chain every 7k, again same area as the cbx etc.
    My 1st was a A shadow 1980 never a issue in 100k (cept that pump seal) maybe the pom bikes were built different like the early A from 79
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  6. #36
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    They never had problems ...



    Perhaps the dispatch riders (in London) rode the CX's a little differently to those that owned and rode them in NZ. It's not KM's ridden that made the difference ... it's HOW they were ridden.



    A "Sampling" of all CX dispatch riders in London you mean ... ??? it's hardly a fair comparison to those owned/ridden on the open road (even by kiwi courier riders) in NZ.



    There's still plenty of VF's and CX's STILL on the road. (Some did make it home though .. )
    Not only despatch riders, remember there are 7 million people in London and plenty more beyond.

    This sounds like a warranty department at any number of motorcycle distributors....''No never heard of that problem before, you are the only one'' Poppycock, the problem was worldwide.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  7. #37
    Join Date
    1st January 2007 - 19:48
    Bike
    Suzuki RG400 Yamaha ST125 Yamaha TDR250
    Location
    Singapura/Banks Peninsula
    Posts
    1,474
    Blog Entries
    1
    And I promise not to get started on the engine removal to replace the frequently burned out stator

    Oops
    "more than two strokes is masturbation"
    www.motoparts-online.com

  8. #38
    Join Date
    30th August 2013 - 18:59
    Bike
    1982 Honda CX500
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    54
    That's something else that was improved with the later TI system

  9. #39
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,589
    Quote Originally Posted by gammaguy View Post
    And I promise not to get started on the engine removal to replace the frequently burned out stator

    Oops
    AYE..... naaaa never, hey I had it down to 20mins engine on the bench... only ever due to water pump seal and for some reason only on 1 of my 5 CX's stator issues... this is the 1st Iv heard of this, are we all talking about the same bike???
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  10. #40
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by dangerous View Post
    AYE..... naaaa never, hey I had it down to 20mins engine on the bench... only ever due to water pump seal and for some reason only on 1 of my 5 CX's stator issues... this is the 1st Iv heard of this, are we all talking about the same bike???
    You know you really dont have to be an apologist for the long list of costly issues with this model. I was there in a market where there are around 70 million people, there were lots of these engineering catastrophes there ( emphatically kept company by some of their other disasters ), there were lots of issues. Thats a far far bigger sampling range than what occured in this insignificant , isolated and sealocked old colonial outpost. Sure, failures may have occured more readily in the UK due to largely more ''loaded'' operating circumstance, but shouldnt any product that is sold be fit for the purpose for which it is sold, without ongoing / high frequency reliability issues? Further, they were hugely unpopular among mechanics as they are inarguably bloody horrible things to work on. Its almost as if Honda temporarily hired some Citroen engineers, gallic wine drinkers and snail eaters who are notorious for finding over complicated ways of doing things.
    Other leading manufacturers have made notorious failures but so have Honda and they cannot claim the moral high ground of ''impeccable reliability'', by any stretch of the imagination
    Last edited by Robert Taylor; 20th April 2014 at 15:17.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  11. #41
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Further, they were hugely unpopular among mechanics as they are inarguably bloody horrible things to work on.
    Yet ... they were "The weapon of choice" by most of the Motorcycle courier/dispatch riders in many parts of the world. Mechanics are paid (well ??) to keep them running ... and I doubt if the riders were concerned that the mechanics felt that way about them.
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  12. #42
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    Yet ... they were "The weapon of choice" by most of the Motorcycle courier/dispatch riders in many parts of the world. Mechanics are paid (well ??) to keep them running ... and I doubt if the riders were concerned that the mechanics felt that way about them.
    Id beg to differ. They were frustrating for many despatch riders ( many who were running a business as contracted self operators supplying their own vehicles ) as there was so much downtime. Fond memories these guys will not have and I remember the many ''juggling acts'' and pressure we were under at the time to keep these guys on the road. All because of dodgy engineering driven by accountants.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  13. #43
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    in this insignificant , isolated and sealocked old colonial outpost.
    hey mate I have to ask... why ya come here then?
    Ill consider myself learned and educated here, but one thing that dosent change is the CX range to me, is amongest the best bikes I have had or riden... so just for you Robbie, and dont shit yaself loughing... one of mine
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CX500b_mod.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	97.9 KB 
ID:	296334  
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  14. #44
    Join Date
    30th August 2013 - 18:59
    Bike
    1982 Honda CX500
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    54
    Can't we play nicely with each other? Don't make me tell my mum

    Dangerous, I have a theory, you had 1980 onwards bikes. They first came out in 78. Honda did recalls and warranty repairs and had 2 or 3 goes at sorting the tensioner out.
    I reckon the bikes you had being 80 onwards were all later versions of the manual tensioner. Which, if checked and adjusted properly last ages.
    The one bike you had with an auto that played up, well you can't really judge the entire build range on one bike can you?

    Robert being a mechanic for Honda back then would have seen lots and lots of these recalls coming in. But Robert, how many times was each bike coming in? Having worked in the car industry I have met mane techs who say "Don't touch an X, they all have Y issue"
    Then when you look further it's a recall or comon fault, that each (or most) only have once... So they may see hundreds of cases of Y fault. But only once on each machine

    There is no doubting the cult following these things have, and the many high mileage bikes around. If you know the faults to keep an eye out for, and how to sort them properly then they seem to last a bloody long time.

    At least I hope so! I know have two!

  15. #45
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,589
    Ohhh bugger it Mr T ya got me looking for old photos LOL... look what I found for ya... dont they look so farking COOL few more of mine LOL
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2xCX500.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	66.6 KB 
ID:	296335   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	500A shadow.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	51.0 KB 
ID:	296336   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CX & EZ.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	127.7 KB 
ID:	296337   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sports.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	105.5 KB 
ID:	296338  
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •