Oh dear, Jeremy has to make public apology for "mumbling" that word

[awayatc]

figures...........?

Numbers........?

Why...49% are below average.....

[Ocean1]

Depends on whether you class shit wages as immoral.

For shit product? The customer reckons it's perfectly reasonable.

Don't like it? Learn a proper trade. One for which customers are prepared to pay unshit prices.


Or not. Your choice.

And there it is. Legality v's Morality and you believing there's a correlation. There's a difference between growing old and growing up old man.

And what, in your world is the purpose of laws if not to define socially acceptable behaviour?

Every market involves theft where claim is laid to that which is not yours.

Correct. By definition a free market is the only one that doesn't involve theft.

I verified 3 of the figures using documents from DWP and Parliament. Some of the DWP fraud is due to people having spent money that they had been overpaid by the govt. They want it back and therefore call it fraud when they can't get it back. Diddums. They should have software that works these days. You need better stories... or more likely, a little trust... man.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was possible to submit a tax return, have it processed by IRD and then receive a return acknowledgement issued with a $0 balance using NZ's up to date software.

Y'know, when I posted the comment about confirmation bias I thought about finding one of the many examples where your proof was so poorly understood as to actually demonstrate your opponent's case. I couldn't be fukd. Thanks for obliging with the perfect example.

[mashman]

Have you verified the 300 people frauding 72 billion though? Interesting choice of words with the 'stories' I don't need fuck all stories, because stories are irrelevant, only facts and figures are relevant. And trust the million dollar hammer salesman?

I found the 300. The tax evasion (FRAUD), figure I didn't find. those figures reported ranged from 70 billion to 120 billion so I'll happily settle for 70 billion. not I Sherlock.

[bogan]

figures...........?

Numbers........?

Why...49% are below average.....

I think you'll find it's a lot higher than 49%... 50% would be below the median though

[bogan]

I found the 300. The tax evasion (FRAUD), figure I didn't find. those figures reported ranged from 70 billion to 120 billion so I'll happily settle for 70 billion. not I Sherlock.

Um, so if it was the fraud figure you didn't find, what were the other ones? Their earnings? nobody would accuse you of being sherlock...

[mashman]

For shit product? The customer reckons it's perfectly reasonable.

Don't like it? Learn a proper trade. One for which customers are prepared to pay unshit prices.

Not slave labour?

... priceless. Again I thank the great gods of marketing and advertising.

Or not. Your choice.

Some don't have a choice due to slave labour wages. the govt has to top 'em up too... or so I've been told.

And what, in your world is the purpose of laws if not to define socially acceptable behaviour?

There will be no laws! There will be morals.

Correct. By definition a free market is the only one that doesn't involve theft.

So the stuff you pay for, do you claim it as yours?

Y'know, when I posted the comment about confirmation bias I thought about finding one of the many examples where your proof was so poorly understood as to actually demonstrate your opponent's case. I couldn't be fukd. Thanks for obliging with the perfect example.

Oh I found most of the figures from official documents fucknuckle. So you can put confirmation to bed and perhaps, maybe just perhaps you'll stop making shit up where you have no evidence other than prejudice.

What example?

[mashman]

Um, so if it was the fraud figure you didn't find, what were the other ones? Their earnings? nobody would accuse you of being sherlock...

You can't be bothered to go back and reread the post eh. How Edlike. A simple thanks would have been fine.

[Ocean1]

Not slave labour?

Slaves don't get paid at all. Exactly what you want for everyone.

... priceless. Again I thank the great gods of marketing and advertising.

Meh, they may cause some few to buy shit they wouldn't otherwise buy, it's still their choice, you don't get to make that decision for them.

Some don't have a choice due to slave labour wages.

Bullshit.

There will be no laws! There will be morals.

Yours?

Big black dog upya.

So the stuff you pay for, do you claim it as yours?

Stuff I paid the seller an agreed price for?

Absolutely.

Oh I found most of the figures from official documents fucknuckle. So you can put confirmation to bed and perhaps, maybe just perhaps you'll stop making shit up where you have no evidence other than prejudice.

I have made up no shit whatsoever.

What example?

Read the post again, slowly.

It won't help you a jot but it'll keep you amused for a while.

[mashman]

Slaves don't get paid at all. Exactly what you want for everyone.

Of course they do. Gots to keep 'em in line massa. Gots to give them the illusion of freedom.

Meh, they may cause some few to buy shit they wouldn't otherwise buy, it's still their choice, you don't get to make that decision for them.

They're the low level shit jockey's.

Bullshit.

Have it your way.

Yours?

Big black dog upya.

Societies.

Racist.

Stuff I paid the seller an agreed price for?

Absolutely.

Ok.

I have made up no shit whatsoever.

Of course you did... you decided I had a confirmation bias towards those figures.

Read the post again, slowly.

It won't help you a jot but it'll keep you amused for a while.

Spell it out for me... or has your confirmation bias got the better of you?

[bogan]

You can't be bothered to go back and reread the post eh. How Edlike. A simple thanks would have been fine.

But your source is not in the post, speaking of Edlike things ofc...

And you just said you couldn't find where the 70 odd billion figure came from either. I mean it is a pretty stark comparison given that the rich defraud 70x more than the poor; well, I mean it would be if it was actually true; I guess confirmation bias doesn't place a large amount of importance on that later detail eh!

[mashman]

But your source is not in the post, speaking of Edlike things ofc...

And you just said you couldn't find where the 70 odd billion figure came from either. I mean it is a pretty stark comparison given that the rich defraud 70x more than the poor; well, I mean it would be if it was actually true; I guess confirmation bias doesn't place a large amount of importance on that later detail eh!

No it isn't... I gotz no problem being Edlike.

... believe what you will.

[bogan]

No it isn't... I gotz no problem being Edlike.

... believe what you will.

As always, I'll believe what the world shows me, as it would be foolish to believe my desires can outweigh the reality; so as usual, I'll beleive what is right. Tis a burden at times, but one I can bear for the sake of science!

[avgas]

I just found out indigo children weren't purple kids.
My disappointment was super-sized.

[mashman]

I just found out indigo children weren't purple kids.
My disappointment was super-sized.

Oh... in which case, and you may want to sit down for this, you might be disappointed by the lack of rainbow children should you go looking.

[Slorider]

he didn't use the word in a final take, whoever drew this to public attention needs a few niggas around to smadh their face in.

Absolutely not-grow up,violence is a substitute for brains-so sick of monkeys using threats of thuggery to resolve their issues