Harre, Dotcom, and Harawira are all smart cookies, so maybe you don't understand what's going on.
They all have their own constituencies and obviously you guys aren't on their list, but that doesn't make it a bad idea.
Don't you watch Game of Thrones?
I want you boys to strip naked, oil yourselves up, and wrestle to see who is the winner. You may use handbags also.
Post pics.
If you get erections then that's entirely your own business. You certainly have the hard-on for each other now.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
well put. What I find amusing is that if (say) the particular poster is fairly obviously sympathetic to the (say) centre right pursuasion, then everyone else is clearly an idiot no-hoping dole bludginb sandal smoking hippie ween. If (say) the poster is more swayed by the centre-left, then everyone else is a fascist, nazi, white middle class male oppressor.
Its all a bit silly.
My views, since you asked? I have no time for any of them. The ones I have met I have found personable enough, but the strictures of party hierarchy, and their universal greed and ambition mean that even if they did once have ideals, they are sacrificed by the day to day requirement to drag down the oppos, and to advance their own careers. I acknowledge that this is very broad generalisation.
Let me give you a specific example. John Banks.: Grew up poor, was smart, worked really hard and "Got somewhere" in life. Successful businessman, decides to go into politics. Because he had dragged himself up by the bootlaces he becomes a person who espouses the right wing views. Relatively successful politician - he was a Cabinet Minister etc. But now, reduced to the equivalent of sucking off Cherman millionaires in carparks for chump change. He will burn for that and deservedly so: and the reason is overarching ambition.
I have a lot of respect for the institutions of government: in particular (and perhaps not surprisingly) the Judicial. What I lack now is any respect at all for he persons fulfilling the executive and legislative roles.
Special mention here for the media and the 24 hour news cycle.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
You are correct - it isn't about left or right.
Despite not agreeing with their political beliefs, I admired and respected most of the people I mentioned in the original post.
Like John Banks (who I have never admired one bit), they have reduced themselves to chasing the money.
Just read on Stuff article Laila worked for UN, she's on the inside, that means this Manadotcom gig is on whether we want it or not.
What have they instore for us...
![]()
Only in your mind dear oscar.
In my little world there aren't any politicians, there are people doing jobs that no one man can do himself. You refer to it as a society. I would rather have it as a community. All mucking in and doing what needs to be done and not getting shafted for it because of tight bastards (a jew in the scouse vernacular) that believe they are more important than anyone else and based on that belief they justify their entire entitlement complex by pretending that they are men of success and that they should be rewarded, coz they iz speshul. So knuckfuckle, there would be no politicians at all in my fantasy land. And damned straight I believe that that is achievable. I see you set your standards of behaviour low. Ooooo shiver.
My entire world is built upon integrity and respect. That's much more of a natural state for a human being to be in, than money grabbing bastard.
bwaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaa... and even if I was, t'would be better than being sheeple.
What a fuckin neanderthal man. Grow an imagination.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks