Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 173

Thread: Navy unable to board fishing vessels

  1. #46
    Join Date
    6th February 2010 - 19:32
    Bike
    V-Strom 1000
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    677
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    NZ needs rail guns.
    But if they run them as well as the rest of the rail system... well...

    (No disrespect to the actual rail workers)

    WELLINGTON: Tag-o-rama

  2. #47
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,493
    Quote Originally Posted by rustyrobot View Post
    But if they run them as well as the rest of the rail system... well...

    (No disrespect to the actual rail workers)
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to rustyrobot again.

    If I was drinking at the time of reading, you would owe me a new monitor
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  3. #48
    Join Date
    6th February 2010 - 19:32
    Bike
    V-Strom 1000
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    677
    Quote Originally Posted by Waihou Thumper View Post
    To a point, and at present they are playing a waiting game (the illegal fishing boats) until such time the RNZN needs to fuel the vessel and bugger off back to port...
    "The navy ship chasing down illegal fishing boats in Antarctic waters is returning to Wellington because it is running low on fuel."

    Damn - we sure showed them! Murray McCully you are a douche.

    "Foreign Minister Murray McCully has pledged to "throw the book" at the poachers and their masters. "

    Oh wait, I get it... they went down there, threw the book (which possibly missed), then came back having reached the extent of their mandate from Masher McCully.

    WELLINGTON: Tag-o-rama

  4. #49
    Join Date
    6th January 2009 - 12:17
    Bike
    Dont have one now
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,710
    Quote Originally Posted by cassina View Post
    Under international law though would a peaceful activity like fishing justify it. They could always fire tear gas canisters at them and only if they start shooting in response then sink them.
    I dont appreciate your quoting me.

    youre a weird cunt

  5. #50
    Join Date
    25th June 2012 - 11:56
    Bike
    Daelim VL250 Daystar
    Location
    Pyongyang
    Posts
    2,672
    Hell I was nearly going to start a thread about this myself....

    This is the most embarrassing thing on world stage our nation has done since we bent over and gave the French their terrorists back after the rainbow warrior incident.
    Look at McCully, even he seemed ashamed to announce it. We are the laughi9ng stock of the fucking world now, Somalia pirates be relocating to the pacific.

    "we asked to board and they said no" WTF!!!!

    We are going to get arseholded on the next season of southpark lol, sure they will make an episode of it.....

    They already had permission from the ships owners, all they had to do was fire few shots or sink the fucker. The US coastguard apparently goes around sinking vessels in international waters that refuse to stop or provide documents.... all those yachts lost at sea and never found....
    The Navy is fuckin lucky Helen is not in charge or the boats would be joining the skyhawks.... Jesus Christ were they running low on Vaseline or something....?????
    Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer

  6. #51
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 13:22
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Oblivion
    Posts
    2,945
    They could have taken Keith Locke out there and used his services - they would have got on board during that exchange no sweat!

    Maybe even Tazered a few of them to demonstrate tazer power and safety to Keith while they were at it! KL for PM - - Tuff love politics!

  7. #52
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by R650R View Post
    Hell I was nearly going to start a thread about this myself....

    This is the most embarrassing thing on world stage our nation has done since we bent over and gave the French their terrorists back after the rainbow warrior incident.
    Look at McCully, even he seemed ashamed to announce it. We are the laughi9ng stock of the fucking world now, Somalia pirates be relocating to the pacific.

    "we asked to board and they said no" WTF!!!!

    We are going to get arseholded on the next season of southpark lol, sure they will make an episode of it.....

    They already had permission from the ships owners, all they had to do was fire few shots or sink the fucker. The US coastguard apparently goes around sinking vessels in international waters that refuse to stop or provide documents.... all those yachts lost at sea and never found....
    The Navy is fuckin lucky Helen is not in charge or the boats would be joining the skyhawks.... Jesus Christ were they running low on Vaseline or something....?????
    What's the point in risking someone's life for a few fish. It's not easy getting onboard a boat that's helping you - let alone one that doesn't want you onboard. If someone went over the side they wouldn't last long in that water.
    I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..

  8. #53
    Join Date
    17th April 2011 - 14:39
    Bike
    Honda VF750f.
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    4,330
    Quote Originally Posted by R650R View Post
    Hell I was nearly going to start a thread about myself....
    Yeah, I can see that happening.
    For a man is a slave to whatever has mastered him. Keep an open mind, just dont let your brains fall out.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by cassina View Post
    Under international law though would a peaceful activity like fishing justify it. They could always fire tear gas canisters at them and only if they start shooting in response then sink them.
    Of course it would. The laws of the capitalist countries are there to protect property, not lives ... fish are property ...
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  10. #55
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Akzle View Post

    who the fuck trusts "the authorities"... even on a good day.

    So what ??? Are you going to go out there and sort it out yourself ???? Yeah right ...
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  11. #56
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 13:22
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Oblivion
    Posts
    2,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Of course it would. The laws of the capitalist countries are there to protect property, not lives ... fish are property ...
    And thats different in communist/socialist/left-wing countries? - How would they have handled the situation differently? Seriously.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 13:22
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Oblivion
    Posts
    2,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Akzle View Post
    why, that's only slightly larger than my pig-gun
    Did anybody notice the price of the practice rounds for Akzle's "Pig Gun"? :"Training ammo $10 each FFS!!" and that's cheap!

    Every night on the TV news etc - terrorists with no means of support fire off at random thousands of dollars worth of miscellaneous ammunition! (each)

    There is no shortage of money for munitions for war - then follows TV coverage of impoverished medical teams trying to administer aid to the sick wounded or dying!

    No money for that sort of activity eh! - Our money systems are being controlled used and abused by design and we just let it happen!

  13. #58
    Join Date
    17th June 2010 - 16:44
    Bike
    bandit
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    2,885
    Quote Originally Posted by oldrider View Post
    And thats different in communist/socialist/left-wing countries? - How would they have handled the situation differently? Seriously.
    Are you asking the question theoretically or based on the countries we currently misrepresent as communist/socialist/left wing?

    Fairly obviously, from an anarchist perspective, there is no such thing as private property so there would be no laws protecting the things that we currently apply that concept to.


    The current crop of left wing dictatorships would have probably blown the boats out of the water ... which is what any of the posters here want .. how interesting ..
    "So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."

  14. #59
    Join Date
    6th February 2010 - 19:32
    Bike
    V-Strom 1000
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    677
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Are you asking the question theoretically or based on the countries we currently misrepresent as communist/socialist/left wing?

    Fairly obviously, from an anarchist perspective, there is no such thing as private property so there would be no laws protecting the things that we currently apply that concept to.


    The current crop of left wing dictatorships would have probably blown the boats out of the water ... which is what any of the posters here want .. how interesting ..
    I would say that another anarchist perspective might be that fish are not 'property', but a common asset which need to be protected, or at least conserved. A consensus could be made to protect the fishing stocks, and then direct action taken against those who act in an adverse manner.

    I suspect that instead of blowing the boats out of the water, many of the dictatorial states would collectivise the boats and the fish, and then put the boats to work doing much the same job. The sailors, well - re-education or labour camps if lucky.

    WELLINGTON: Tag-o-rama

  15. #60
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 13:22
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Oblivion
    Posts
    2,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Banditbandit View Post
    Are you asking the question theoretically or based on the countries we currently misrepresent as communist/socialist/left wing?

    Fairly obviously, from an anarchist perspective, there is no such thing as private property so there would be no laws protecting the things that we currently apply that concept to.


    The current crop of left wing dictatorships would have probably blown the boats out of the water ... which is what any of the posters here want .. how interesting ..
    Just wanted to know what your alternative was that's all - nothing tricky - just askin and you have told me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •