Your sovereign rights being flushed down the toilet by our politicians

[bogan]

if you want to be . . . the people that have had no problem with comprehension might disagree
im not fussed either way

Oh look, more evasion of the main point but assertions that you are correct regardless.

Look, you've already shown everybody I'm right, there is no need to keep doing so

[flyingcrocodile46]

To show that I'm right on both counts? Fine by me

Yeah! Right.

Nice avatar btw. Was it a choice of mere chance or a display of self conscious irony.

[bogan]

Yeah! Right.

Nice avatar btw. Was it a choice of mere chance or a display of self conscious irony.

Thanks for your agreement and support.

I literally swung my mouse at the keyboard an it loaded that avatar, I didn't choose it even a little bit.

[Virago]

It's interesting to note that if all the "Prove it" "No, you prove it" posts were removed from these conspiracy threads, there wouldn't be much left.

The key issue is that it is the responsibility of the person who makes a claim to provide the evidential proof, not the responsibility of others to prove them wrong.

I could claim that the sun is going to explode* at 10.46am on 27 July 2104. Can you prove me wrong? No of course you can't. But does that make me right - can I prove it?



* The sun exploding may be part of a Zionist conspiracy...

[flyingcrocodile46]

Thanks for your agreement and support.

I literally swung my mouse at the keyboard an it loaded that avatar, I didn't choose it even a little bit.

Didn't give it a thought huh!

#makes mental note for future reference# 'Admission of making decisions without thinking - Zero credibility in respect to claims as to forming an opinion'

[flyingcrocodile46]

It's interesting to note that if all the "Prove it" "No, you prove it" posts were removed from these conspiracy threads, there wouldn't be much left.

The key issue is that it is the responsibility of the person who makes a claim to provide the evidential proof, not the responsibility of others to prove them wrong.

I could claim that the sun is going to explode* at 10.46am on 27 July 2104. Can you prove me wrong? No of course you can't. But does that make me right - can I prove it?

* The sun exploding may be part of a Zionist conspiracy...

I think it is self evident that your claim is bogus. You might have stood a better chance if the claim was for 27 July 2105.


What did I win?

[Brian d marge]

and if evidence was given then the onus falls on the person who dismisses the evidence given to explain why or keep quiet
if neither happens then the term idiot applies

[Oscar]

and if evidence was given then the onus falls on the person who dismisses the evidence given to explain why or keep quiet
if neither happens then the term idiot applies

Even the idiot that you are trying to defend won't back up his shyte.
Give up now before you make even more of a twat of yourself.

[Brian d marge]

Oh look, more evasion of the main point but assertions that you are correct regardless.

Look, you've already shown everybody I'm right, there is no need to keep doing so

no evasion

ive even offered to spend time offline explaining things to you

not much else i can do really

[Brian d marge]

Even the idiot that you are trying to defend won't back up his shyte.
Give up now before you make even more of a twat of yourself.

he did
and has offline shown me

you just . .as usual . .dismissed it

as you did with the link i posted

which if had bothered actually led to a very interesting speaker . .whether you agreed with him or not

but you were true to form . .even down to the choice of noun used to descibe the person

step ya game up old man

[Oscar]

he did
and has offline shown me

you just . .as usual . .dismissed it

as you did with the link i posted

which if had bothered actually led to a very interesting speaker . .whether you agreed with him or not

but you were true to form . .even down to the choice of noun used to descibe the person

step ya game up old man

So now instead of google it yourself or calls to disprove nonsense, now it's offline conversations.
Sad, really...

[bogan]

no evasion

ive even offered to spend time offline explaining things to you

not much else i can do really

Lots of evasion, you've still yet to explain who actually has no problem understanding your illiterate posts.

That in itself is evasion, why evade explaining things here?

You could make more of an effort to either proof read or learn proper English grammar. But is suspect you're like many of the other stupid worlders, who would far rather blame somebody else instead of finding the path to self improvement.

[bogan]

now it's offline conversations.

Offline conversations that you have dismissed apparently. Not sure how you are expected not to dismiss something you haven't seen though...

[bogan]

Didn't give it a thought huh!

#makes mental note for future reference# 'Admission of making decisions without thinking - Zero credibility in respect to claims as to forming an opinion'

Your sarcasm detector broken?

I didn't give your vid a thought, because it was not accompanied by one

[Brian d marge]

So now instead of google it yourself or calls to disprove nonsense, now it's offline conversations.
Sad, really...

clutching at straws again . .

it may be sad in your world

but thats . .in our world . ,how friends comunicate

ya called everyone one on kb
an idiot
ya constantly call people fwits etc

and when asked to clarify , . ie put up or shut up we get 32 pages of oscarism

now THAT is sad