This cunt got what he deserved!

[Katman]

Ah, but he DIDN'T blow his brains out, - hence the thread.

So why introduce the 'if' factor now???

That's right shit-for-brains, a police officer ran him down, at speed, from behind - hence the thread.

[scumdog]

Is mental illness automatically justification for using lethal force?

No.

I mean YOU'RE still alive, ain't you??

[jasonu]

So let me get this straight.....

On the morning he was hit, he stole from a 7 Eleven and was charged with theft.

An hour later he set fire to a church and was charged with arson.

How the fuck was he still at large later on in the day to be able to steal a car and gun?

He robbed the 7 Eleven in his underwear. Did the police not stop to wonder about his mental state?

Is mental illness automatically justification for using lethal force?

Common sense and the time lines in the article would say he was charged AFTER THE FACT, not at the actual time of the crimes.
You are right when you say mental illness is not automatic justification for lethal force. But pointing a gun at the police will almost always result in serious repercussions.

[Swoop]

As for the Gun licences - America's 5th Amendment right is what allows

What the fuck are you talking about? Get your facts straight.
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights and protects a person against being compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in a criminal case.

[scumdog]

That's right shit-for-brains, a police officer ran him down, at speed, from behind - hence the thread.

So why drag the 'if' factor into it a few posts back, sheesh, what a non-sequitur...

[JimO]

what a non-sequitur...

posh.......

[Katman]

So why drag the 'if' factor into it a few posts back, sheesh, what a non-sequitur...

Are you telling me that "what if he'd taken a hostage and shot them" isn't dragging in the "if" factor?

Like I said earlier, take a little longer to think before hitting the 'submit post' button.

[scumdog]

Are you telling me that "what if he'd taken a hostage and shot them" isn't dragging in the "if" factor?

Like I said earlier, take a little longer to think before hitting the 'submit post' button.

You were pretty quick to hit the 'submit' button yourself as you castigate others that used the mighty 'if'.

But are happy to use it yourself.


I am starting to think I'm arguing with that pigeon from Crasherfromwaybacks post few posts ago so I guess there's no use telling YOU to think...

[TheDemonLord]

What the fuck are you talking about? Get your facts straight.
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights and protects a person against being compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in a criminal case.

Oh Shit!

you are 100% correct - I meant the 2nd amendment

[unstuck]

http://www.ktvq.com/story/28813119/o...ied-chief-says

That puts a slightly different spin on the turn of events for sure. Still unsure if this is the FULL story though, because CNN have been know to make shit up before.

Still think the officer over reacted and there would have been another way to handle the situation IMO.

Seemed easy enough for you to post up some(not FULL) information though. Would still like to see that side of it.

[jasonu]

That puts a slightly different spin on the turn of events for sure. Still unsure if this is the FULL story though, because CNN have been know to make shit up before.

Still think the officer over reacted and there would have been another way to handle the situation IMO.

Seemed easy enough for you to post up some(not FULL) information though. Would still like to see that side of it.

What 'full' information are you wanting.
I found that with a quick google search 'police run over suspect'. I think it covered it nicely. The guy is a scumbag that did scumbag deeds and got what was coming to him.

[unstuck]

The guy is a scumbag that did scumbag deeds and got what was coming to him.

Maybe, but that article was from a source know for sensationalizing items of news. The FULL story apparently is not covered by sensationalist media, and thats the one I'm after.

[scumdog]

From the criminal idiots lady lawyer:"My client's back was turned and the officer drove right into him," she said. "It isn't that dissimilar to a police officer shooting a fleeing suspect in the back."

Spare me days!

Yes, the officer should have driven past the criminal idiot, executed a smooth U-turn (hopefully without cleaning up any motorbikes) then rammed the idiot face on - Queensberry rules and all that old chap!

[unstuck]

Yes, the officer should have driven past the idiot offender, executed a smooth U-turn (hopefully without cleaning up any motorbikes) then rammed the idiot face on - Queensberry rules and all that old chap!

Would have made a better video.

[willytheekid]

Ahhh you lot!


...Im STILL laughin! (hit him THROUGH!! a brick wall...thats just awesome!)


Clear cut to me...the guy(Idiot, violent scumbag) points a gun at cops, the public and himself(Nuts!)....robs a place, sets a church on fire (with people in it!!) and has a previous record of violence etc

What did you expect the cops to do?...talk him down?, wait for him to fall asleep, put there own lives at risk in a armed stand off with a fuckin nutbag!


I thought the popo did bloody good!...In the moment, he saw an opportunity & opening to drop this fucker, fast! & HARD!!...so he took it! (And saved bullets in the process)



The nutbag started this rampage, the police are paid to stop it...by any means possible if it saves lives (theres as well!)...so they did! (And it looked fickin COOOOL...well, for us..obviously NOT the nutbag lol)


FUCK EM! - Live by the sword...die by the sword!.


Hence...Im starting to understand why the NZ Popo are bringing more "heavys/Thugs" into the force...just so many fucking violent armed thugs havin a go at the police nowadays...hence, ya fight fire with fire!...never nice, but times are changing, and the loonies are multiplying thanks to PC fuckers banning darwinism!