Anarchy is not what you think it is

[sidecar bob]

... I believe what was provided shows that it's already working and it is indeed happening in real life. You should concentrate on getting your head removed from your arse. If you club in with ocean and oscar you guys could probably get a decent discount

I believe what was provided is possibly the biggest pile of shit ever posted on this forum, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

[mashman]

I believe what was provided is possibly the biggest pile of shit ever posted on this forum, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Funny way to describe something that you now know works in real life. Ok.

[bogan]

I believe what was provided is possibly the biggest pile of shit ever posted on this forum, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Over 50% of that vid was spend looking up some opinionated twat's nostril. Funnily enough, traffic rules could also be used as an example of how order naturally comes from anarchy. I fail to see the logic in trying to force it back the other way

[sidecar bob]

Funny way to describe something that you now know works in real life. Ok.

It doesn't fuckin work. I gather that the idea of anarchy is that you can do whatever the fuck you Like, except for stopping others from doing whatever the fuck they like.
Well I'm coming over to your place to screw your misus & take your bike & apparently there's fuck all you can do to stop me. Does that sound like a system that works to you?

[Gadget1]

Dawn service disrupted:http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11438510

[Gadget1]

No, anarchy is exactly what I think it is.

Yes, it's very subjective.

[mashman]

It doesn't fuckin work. I gather that the idea of anarchy is that you can do whatever the fuck you Like, except for stopping others from doing whatever the fuck they like.
Well I'm coming over to your place to screw your misus & take your bike & apparently there's fuck all you can do to stop me. Does that sound like a system that works to you?

Oh I see, you meant it in the wider context and not the traffic light thing? Either way the same can be said of anarchy. Give people the chance to be decent human beings and they will. You don't believe that, bah humbug

You're more than welcome to come around, but you better be devastatingly handsome or the missus will just laugh at you. That there are laws in place do not stop that from happening . Need a tiny prick to pop your precious bubble? Guess what I'm about to say.

[sidecar bob]

Give people the chance to be decent human beings and they will. You don't believe that, bah humbug

No, I really don't believe that. Removing rules & enforcement will make everyone suddenly behave?
That is a truly delusional notion. People already have the opportunity to be decent human beings regardless of anything.

[mashman]

No, I really don't believe that. Removing rules & enforcement will make everyone suddenly behave?
That is a truly delusional notion. People already have the opportunity to be decent human beings regardless of anything.

Yes, it will. Given that the vast majority of us actually give a shit. Why would I believe otherwise?
Sounds like you need to put your hands in your trouser and............ pop. Humans, even the really bad ones, are good 99% of the time. Circumstance brings out their inner cunt! Lack of "something", leaves them as a cunt, but only 1% of the time. Even politicians

[sidecar bob]

Everyone has the right to believe anything they want & everyone else has the right to find it fucking ridiculous.
For example, Do you believe that talking to an imaginary friend will make you a better person?
A lot of people do, I find the notion to be preposterous.

[Akzle]

It doesn't fuckin work. I gather that the idea of anarchy is that you can do whatever the fuck you Like, except for stopping others from doing whatever the fuck they like.
Well I'm coming over to your place to screw your misus & take your bike & apparently there's fuck all you can do to stop me. Does that sound like a system that works to you?

the way i live/ phrase it, is that I claim the right to do whatever the fuck i want, with the responsibility to not fuck up anyone else's day.

i don't think you've comprehended the original premise.

You're more than welcome to come around, but you better be devastatingly handsome or the missus will just laugh at you.

'the fuck you get lucky then???

[flyingcrocodile46]

Everyone has the right to believe anything they want & everyone else has the right to find it fucking ridiculous.
For example, Do you believe that talking to an imaginary friend will make you a better person?
A lot of people do, I find the notion to be preposterous.

Might that be a mechanism that some people might use as a form of introspective reflection that helps them find balance of perspective? Maybe for some it is a way of putting themselves in the shoes of another in an attempt to gain a wider perspective. That might be a foreign concept for you and a good starting point for some personal development?


Another good illustration in this 16 minute documentary which serves to show the folly of the opposite of anarchy. A very well researched and documented analysis of the changes in education regulation and expenditure and the diminishing returns. It also looks into the insidious motives behind the regulation and highlight the direct threat to our development and welfare.

https://youtu.be/d2Lz6lv9crA

[mashman]

the way i live/ phrase it, is that I claim the right to do whatever the fuck i want, with the responsibility to not fuck up anyone else's day.

i don't think you've comprehended the original premise.

It's not how we're trained to be.

'the fuck you get lucky then???

... I never said I was handsome, but I doubt the missus would be too happy at a stranger turning up to fuck her. I drugged her and Derren Brown'd her, so she knows no different.

[mashman]

Everyone has the right to believe anything they want & everyone else has the right to find it fucking ridiculous.
For example, Do you believe that talking to an imaginary friend will make you a better person?
A lot of people do, I find the notion to be preposterous.

True. Doesn't mean that 1 version should be imposed on another and given that there are laws, it certainly looks to be that way. So it sounds more like hypocrisy
If it does the person good, then yes. If it doesn't, then no.
Then you care more about the reason for the person being happy than the fact that they're happy. I reckon that's where we're differing?

[mashman]

Dawn service disrupted:http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11438510

And as a sign of respect to someone's loss at football matches, fans have started to clap instead of stand in silence. Could it have been a sign of respect? Or was it just to piss people off? I'll go for the former and see it as a shame that people feel that they must decry the way another respects the dead. It's ironic given that those being celebrated fought for such freedoms to be had.