
Originally Posted by
eldog
If your going to make cheap houses, there needs to be a standard which they are healthy to live in and the ground needs to be above the water table. Not some cheap freezing cold shitboxes which leak.
But your right, it would work for some. Its just getting work for people to do so they can reasonably be able to pay for it. - this is the kicker
The general bleating about house pricing almost always fails to compare apples with apples. Your parents/grandparents could afford a cheap, freezing cold 90sqM shitbox that met the standards of their day, (just) they almost certainly couldn't have afforded the 200sqM palace today's prospective homeowners are comparing it to.
NZ houses are amongst the largest and best appointed in the world, and frankly, I don't give a shit how many people can't afford these 200sqM palaces. But I do care that a generation of kids are denied the basic entry-level house our parents were proud to own and in which they raised us, with varying degrees of success.
Make no bones about it, ill conceived building standards and arbitrary council compliance costs are a large part of the reason for today's house prices, they're the delight of every monopoly currently profiting from them. If we were allowed to and if the building sites were available then economies of scale and superior materials and design would today make the cost of those small 3 bdrm "sub-standard" homes our parents started with a fair bit less than it ever cost them, certainly not more.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bookmarks