My first poll for the NZ public

[mashman]

Lol, your version of fun is diametrically opposed to mine I'd think.

If that's what you choose to think, then that is all you will ever think. Do you need an extra eye patch so that you too can be one of the many many many many proxy's that know what I'm thinking better than I do. You fit the profile.

[bogan]

I'm not a politician, that's why . Stop being so negative.

It does, however, show that the majority are able to look past the messenger

I'm not that presumptive.

You can still be a politician with fuck all followers, which is exactly what you are.

Which majority?

Any time you count that category as being in favor of a moneyless system, you presume exactly that.

[Zedder]

If that's what you choose to think, then that is all you will ever think. Do you need an extra eye patch so that you too can be one of the many many many many proxy's that know what I'm thinking better than I do. You fit the profile.

I was being polite. To be blunt, I wouldn't want anything to do with your "fun".

Here's more info on what's going on with humanitarian organisations like Mercy Corps. Warning:There's good news so you probably won't like that:http://www.france24.com/en/20150522-...food-charities

[Gadget1]

Nah, mushy already counted me onto his team since I voted 'yes but it will never happen'

Given that I'm both counted on his side, and being the change he wishes to see, just makes me tingly inside...

Lol, what a dreamer he is!

[bogan]

Lol, what a dreamer he is!

Indeed, I wonder why he chooses to think such negative things about reality though... Surely given the choice you would think positive

[Gadget1]

Indeed, I wonder why he chooses to think such negative things about reality though... Surely given the choice you would think positive

It's easy for some people to be positive...

[mashman]

You can still be a politician with fuck all followers, which is exactly what you are.

Which majority?

Any time you count that category as being in favor of a moneyless system, you presume exactly that.

No I'm not.

You brought it up and you've forgotten already. Was using your same criteria but putting a positive spin on it.

No, it's an assumption as I am more than aware that people could change their minds. What I do take into consideration though, is that making such a decision isn't something one does lightly so on the balance of probabilities, I presume that those minds are highly unlikely to change. But then again, my skewed thinking knows does no bounds.

[Gadget1]

I was being polite. To be blunt, I wouldn't want anything to do with your "fun".

Here's more info on what's going on with humanitarian organisations like Mercy Corps. Warning:There's good news so you probably won't like that:http://www.france24.com/en/20150522-...food-charities

Great to see that and from a Government too. You can wind down now mashman, things are looking better.

[bogan]

No I'm not.

You brought it up and you've forgotten already. Was using your same criteria but putting a positive spin on it.

No, it's an assumption as I am more than aware that people could change their minds. What I do take into consideration though, is that making such a decision isn't something one does lightly so on the balance of probabilities, I presume that those minds are highly unlikely to change. But then again, my skewed thinking knows does no bounds.

You using you own definition for this one then, the dictionary tells a different story.

So, misleading stats, then evasion to cover up such misleading... not, not sounding like a politician at all

Your interpretation of public opinion is based on the presumption that said opinion will change in your favour. Well done mashy, just, well done.

[mashman]

I was being polite. To be blunt, I wouldn't want anything to do with your "fun".

Here's more info on what's going on with humanitarian organisations like Mercy Corps. Warning:There's good news so you probably won't like that:http://www.france24.com/en/20150522-...food-charities

Cool.......... In which case

You haven't got a fuckin clue what I would consider good news. It is great to see them following the example of the dumpster divers and getting the "waste" out to the community where it's needed. Why are these practices led by the dumpster divers? How long have they been dumping it in the bin for when they know that there's people who could do with it? Lemme guess, you'll throw up some bullshit about encouraging dependency. Well it did just that, except it was facilitated by dumpster divers doing a good deed. The reason it wasn't led by the corporates/govt and their fantastically well paid think tanks/focus groups/lobby groups etc... is because it costs MONEY to distribute that could otherwise got towards useful things like paying people for think tanks/focus groups/lobby groups. What I would like to know is, what's encouraged the sudden change of heart?

Oh yeah, fuck you and your shite mind reading skills.

[mashman]

Great to see that and from a Government too. You can wind down now mashman, things are looking better.

down proxy, down.

[mashman]

You using you own definition for this one then, the dictionary tells a different story.

So, misleading stats, then evasion to cover up such misleading... not, not sounding like a politician at all

Your interpretation of public opinion is based on the presumption that said opinion will change in your favour. Well done mashy, just, well done.

It can't change unless it is offered change enjoy your fail.

[Zedder]

Cool.......... In which case

You haven't got a fuckin clue what I would consider good news. It is great to see them following the example of the dumpster divers and getting the "waste" out to the community where it's needed. Why are these practices led by the dumpster divers? How long have they been dumping it in the bin for when they know that there's people who could do with it? Lemme guess, you'll throw up some bullshit about encouraging dependency. Well it did just that, except it was facilitated by dumpster divers doing a good deed. The reason it wasn't led by the corporates/govt and their fantastically well paid think tanks/focus groups/lobby groups etc... is because it costs MONEY to distribute that could otherwise got towards useful things like paying people for think tanks/focus groups/lobby groups. What I would like to know is, what's encouraged the sudden change of heart?

Oh yeah, fuck you and your shite mind reading skills.

Well seeing as you post link after link about "white muthafuckers" and negative crap, you are very wrong about that. Your posts are rarely positive and your attitude is shit.

Change of heart? It's all down to you isn't it?

[bogan]

It can't change unless it is offered change enjoy your fail.

A valid point, except the presumption that the change you offer is any different from the many offered before is unsubstantiated.

Or to put it another way, how many that you would count on your side have switched after reading what you put forward? and how many have gone the other way? time for another poll if you were interested in the truth, if you are just a politician interested in massaging the stats, then no fuhrer poll is required. I won't hold my breath :

[mashman]

Well seeing as you post link after link about "white muthafuckers" and negative crap, you are very wrong about that. Your posts are rarely positive and your attitude is shit.

Change of heart? It's all down to you isn't it?

It's not negative crap. What is my definition of a white muthafucka?

I thought it was dumpster divers.