
Originally Posted by
mossy1200
I work with a very safe bunch and we do everything possible to keep everything under control. Nobody is afraid to say stop work if conditions change and what we do is at the top end of caution required.
BUT
The issue is we do this and the NZ Safety rep for the main contractor will look at a safety plan following the latest workplace safety preferred method to access an area by machinery and refuse the method claiming a ladder is safer because of a risk that machinery hydraulic failure will leave us stranded 5metres up. I am sure I see a ladder as being the least desired method of notifiable height access possible on Workplace NZ standards. Big conflict of interests going on.
I agree with you that the situation described sounds wrong, like as if they think it will be cheaper for you to use ladder etc or quieter. Doesn't sound like a plausible reason to exclude machinery. Should ask them if they would ever have a crane on site for a job then....
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Bookmarks