I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........
Don't disagree with any of this. The point I was endeavoring to make was evaluating the Bike's general ability to cope with off road terrain - not the riders, or the bike and the riders. Flagging a bike because you don't think you can handle it in the rough is one thing, but that's not to say the bike couldn't easily cope with it......I'm talking an average off road rider skills here not ex extreme enduro pilots
But back on topicThe AT certainly falls into this category....will a lot of owners take if off road lots? maybe not....is the bike capable of handling it....definitely!....that's all I'm sayin
.
....wherezz that track go
I guess now that a spate of videos showing big beemers in strife are available for comparison we just need to wait for AT vids to surface and then we can gauge which one gets the most stuck. Always a good off road bench mark. Some bikes have an ability to tempt mere mortals into some very precarious situations.![]()
Manopausal.
Two vids succinctly showing the can and the can't. Well done.
The poor bugger in the 2nd one, on road tires..... I felt sorry for him. He needs to weight the pegs more.![]()
Manopausal.
I would imagine all big adventure bikes are similar in riding style. Momentum is actually your friend, you want to bulldoze through things... until momentum is your enemy and then it's your nemesis.
Clearly some momentum would have helped there and make some of it look really easy, but equally, when it hits a rock, or your wheel starts going in the wrong direction, it's super hard to bring it back. Road tyres... yeah, really not a good idea. That's actually one of the beauties of these big bikes. Throw on road tyres, do long days back to back in comfort. Switch to knobblies and they're reasonably competent (ability directly proportional to your stupidity) in rough environments.
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
The peg weighting was defo tongue in cheek and I totally agree with the momentum. That's what I learned on the TDM, don't sit there like a rigid muppet, stand up, relax, look, and ride the bloody thing with the right hand.
Manopausal.
100% correct. The AT with a 1000cc really feels a lot more like a 690 in regards to power overcoming the weight. It has torque, and power to wheelie so it's ok from that perspective.
I know we often get to performance in these discussions, while for some it's not important, but for me, I like a bit of grunt and excitement that power gives. Besides the hoon factor, power helps riding. Being able to pop the wheel over obstacles, streams etc or punch into a head wind, over take traffic, attempt a hill climb in the wrong gear or have enough power to pull higher gearing so that roads are manageable. I would rather put a better seat and better fairing on the 690, which in my mind is all the AT really offers. Forget the big bikes here in NZ...save them for the continent riding. (I rode a GSA in Aussie and thought it was great).
I also take on board that as we age, we are also not up for hard core riding which again leads me to suggest lighter bikes not heavier?...PS love the NF 530 adventure btw
...back in the saddle, and getting a little!
[QUOTE=Gremlin;1130968855]You gotta be joking. We all ride them like this:
QUOTE]
That 2nd guy bought the dream I bet when he put all his shit on it and rode it out the garage...like mentioned here, too slow, too frustrating to watch...if he carried momentum and let the bike do its stuff....it would be fine. I think it fall off anything.
The aussie ride I did was with Geoff Ballard and his mate ,who were pre riding the course for the Aussie BMW safari so he lent me an older GSA1200 and I was clearly concerned riding with a legend like him but he;s awesome and is about the ride more than trying to break speed records...yet he does prefer taking the bike where they shouldn't. I was genuinely surprised where this big pig would go but you really have to be good first, as learning on that is hard. I only dropped it once, got stuck-ish twice and let him ride it down one fucking nasty downhill, I didn't want to wreck his bike, nor myself!!
...back in the saddle, and getting a little!
How many of us actually give a decent amount of thought to the riding we actually do (opposed to would like to do) or are capable of doing before deciding on a bike? Then there's the try it and see approach of ownership....I've just done that one, its expensive when it don't work out.
Big bikes have their limitations, that's a given, but they do cover a broad range of bases. Generally speaking you get:
A good road bike that handles blasting, commuting, day tripping, or touring.
They can carry good amount of luggage and a passenger
Not lacking on power...wow factor is important...on ya Veg for pointing that out!
Can get you off the beaten track and will handle quite gnarly terrain....if your up to it.
Are more comfortable ride....big plus for broken down over 50's
I do like the AT and also the 1050 but its 19inch front wheel was getting me down....until I realized nearly all the competition including the 1190 adv as well as zee fuer of all adventure bikes, the BMW GSA all have 19inch fronts and 17inch rears. So I don't think its going to limit me much at all especially in 99% of the terrain I will be riding it in.
I looked hard at a new 690 last night which is also a $20K+ bike (with all the add-ons I would need to hiff at it) but in the end most of the reasons you'd want a great lightweight adv bike for I wont be needingand I had that and more with the 530 I just sold
The big bikes are quite possibly overkill for NZ conditions, but as Arnie says in his latest war game advert.....why send in one attack Helicopter when six will do!![]()
....wherezz that track go
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks