Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[mada]

The plot thickens....

I searched on bing.com and found the anti-vacc campaign is founded by big pharma/medico as more money is made from someone being on medications costing hundreds of dollars and expensive medical equipment up to hundreds of thousands per patient than injecting someone with a cheap vaccine that costs a couple of dollars per person + 1 or 2 needles.

[mashman]

Have we invoked Godwin's Law yet?

Nope, it's all yours. Have a chocolate starfish.

[Oscar]

No, it's basic respect for the wishes of another.

C'est la vie, potentially.

So if I wished to send my unvaccinated kids to a creche with your kids?

Or if I wished not to bother getting a licence to drive?

Or if I wished to drive pissed off my face in your neighbourhood?

Or wished to import some assault weapons and the a copy "ISIS Terror Manual for Big Boys"?

You'd respect my wishes?

[Akzle]

So if I wished to send my unvaccinated kids to a creche with your kids?

Or if I wished not to bother getting a licence to drive?

Or if I wished to drive pissed off my face in your neighbourhood?

Or wished to import some assault weapons and the a copy "ISIS Terror Manual for Big Boys"?

You'd respect my wishes?

yes.but as soon as you fuck up someone elses day i'd non-consensually bumsex you.

[mashman]

So if I wished to send my unvaccinated kids to a creche with your kids?

Or if I wished not to bother getting a licence to drive?

Or if I wished to drive pissed off my face in your neighbourhood?

Or wished to import some assault weapons and the a copy "ISIS Terror Manual for Big Boys"?

You'd respect my wishes?

No problem. There's no guarantee that my vaccinated kids are immune to measles. If they get measles, I'm gonna have to deal with it like my parents did when I had the measles. If my kids die and an investigation pins the blame on your kids, why would I hate you or your kids for it? Like I said, c'est la vie.

No problem. If you're a shit driver you're a shit driver. A license ain't gonna change that. Even if you're the best driver in the world you could still kill someone either through you inattention or someone else's.

No problem. You made your choice. If you kill my kid then yes, I'd be seriously pissed off at you... but it'll change nothing. Wotcha gonna do, ban alcohol? They could just as easily be killed by a non-pissed driver.

No problem. The government seems to be allowed to do it.

Apparently yes.

[mashman]

yes.but as soon as you fuck up someone elses day i'd non-consensually bumsex you.

WTF is wrong with a bullet? Are you a conspiracy theorist

[Akzle]

WTF is wrong with a bullet? Are you a conspiracy theorist

i never said i wouldnt.
But death penalty has proven to be an ineffective deterrent.
Ass rape on the other hand...

[mashman]

i never said i wouldnt.
But death penalty has proven to be an ineffective deterrent.
Ass rape on the other hand...

... can also be an ineffective deterrent in some circumstances. And I'm guessing this is one of those instances and that you'll receive flowers instead of a visit from the plod.

[Woodman]

yes.but as soon as you fuck up someone elses day i'd non-consensually bumsex you.

How many times a day does your goat fuck up your day? I bet that poor goat can't do anything right.

[Akzle]

How many times a day does your goat fuck up your day? I bet that poor goat can't do anything right.

dunno about that,,, she fucks like an animal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppOu3ogzL-M

[mashman]

"Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a former British gastro-enterologist and vaccine researcher has been fully exonerated of the charges that he, together with a world renowned pediatric gastroenterologist, Prof. John Walker-Smith, conducted fraudulent tests with children that raised the possibility of a link between the popular MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine and onset of autism and other severe symptoms."

[mada]

http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skept...field-wronged/

On March 7, 2012 Judge Mitting of the British High Court of Justice quashed the British General Medical Council (GMC)’s finding that Professor John Walker-Smith was guilty of serious professional misconduct. On November 21, 2014, for the umpteenth time, an anti-vaccine activist linked to the decision regarding Walker-Smith as evidence that Andrew Wakefield was wronged when the GMC found him, too, guilty of serious ethical violations.

The problem is that that’s incorrect. While others have examined the issue, it might be worth examining the decision closely yet again, since several tropes that Andrew Wakefield was wronged continue to come back to life.


Even a cursory look at this list shows that while there is some overlap, the allegations against Andrew Wakefield were more extensive and more serious. In other words, he was charged with actions not imputed to Walker-Smith, and hence not addressed in the appeal by the latter. The most serious ones were probably not disclosing his litigation-related conflicts of interests. Those were actually addressed in Walker-Smith’s appeal – in ways that emphasize the problematic behavior of Andrew Wakefield.

Does Walker-Smith’s decision exonerate Andrew Wakefield? The decision, if read generously, can cast doubt on one set of findings against Wakefield–that he subjected some of the children to invasive tests that were not clinically indicated. It leaves untouched, however, the rest of the charges found proved against Wakefield, and in fact, reinforces several of the allegations–for example,that Wakefield conducted research without ethics committee approval, that Wakefield included misrepresentations in the paper, and that Wakefield did not disclose conflicts of interests. It’s anything but an exoneration, and the charges against Wakefield, as the GMC concluded, amount to serious ethical violations.

Editor’s note: This article was originally published in December 2014. It has been revised and re-published in light of the current kerfuffle regarding the Tribeca Film Festival. The zombie trope that Andrew Wakefield was actually innocent has arisen again.

Meanwhile a possible potential link vs. real countless children deaths and morbidities from the epidemics due to non-vaccination that have resulted from his scare-mongering.

[mashman]

http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skept...field-wronged/

Meanwhile a possible potential link vs. real countless children deaths and morbidities from the epidemics due to non-vaccination that have resulted from his scare-mongering.

"In a series of phone discussions in 2015 with US Congressman Bill Posey, Thompson described (all on tape) that while he was a senior scientist at CDC, he and his colleagues, after making a study of the link between vaccines and incidence of autism in small black boys, “scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room, and reviewed and went through all the hardcopy documents that we had thought we should discard, and put them into a huge garbage can.” Thompson is quoted declaring, “Oh my God! I cannot believe we did what we did. But we did.”"

[Akzle]

http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skept...field-wronged/





Meanwhile a possible potential link vs. real countless children deaths and morbidities from the epidemics due to non-vaccination that have resulted from his scare-mongering.

your right. Vaccination has improved the gene pool and cured all the//

o, wait on.

[Katman]

Meanwhile a possible potential link vs. real countless children deaths and morbidities from the epidemics due to non-vaccination that have resulted from his scare-mongering.

Countless?

Really?