Friday Night Rants?

[dangerous]

...27 years ago when we first arrived here, the frogs were that noisy, you could not think clearly when outside at night...unless you threw a brick into the dark...that usually shut the closest ones up for a few minutes...over the years, sprays, diesel fumes and other shit have either killed or driven them elsewhere...lucky to hear any now...closer to spring when I get the water lilies and other foliage going I will give Torren a dollar a frog, if he wants to make some pocket money...

hey he still owes ya lovely missus for the nitted jersey from 7yrs ago... pitty the old boy over the road just dug his pool up, every year there would be a 100 tad poles in there once frogs they couldent get out.

speaking of old boys over the rd seen that Grumph today hes doing well with my new bucket engine 150 twin that spins at 20,000 rpm seen Kickaha's sidecar engine and thought "that aint gona last long" well not after I stuck a bit of chuddy in a arterial oil way...

[RDJ]

Yeah it's not Friday but you know what - screw it.

This afternoon, like very many of you inmates, I came home from a 12-hour-plus workday (at least five hours of which I worked just to pay taxes to the Black Hole of Cost-Effectiveness, Infernal Revenue, but I digress) to read that "Housing New Zealand - which we taxpayers fund entirely - "has had to demolish multiple houses in the last year, and has many more unfit for human habitation, because of people cooking meth in them.

Given that the meth-ferals are sucking on the taxpayer teat at least thrice, (1) with their benefit-addiction (2) with their taxpayer-funded house, and (3) with their taxpayer-funded healthcare... why isn't any and every state housing tenant who has a meth-contaminated house during or after their sojourn being blacklisted for a minimally-reasonable period?*

* Let's say 40 years

... before becoming eligible for taxpayer-funded housing again?

H8ters, bring it on.

[ellipsis]

Yeah it's not Friday but you know what - screw it.

This afternoon, like very many of you inmates, I came home from a 12-hour-plus workday (at least five hours of which I worked just to pay taxes to the Black Hole of Cost-Effectiveness, Infernal Revenue, but I digress) to read that "Housing New Zealand - which we taxpayers fund entirely - "has had to demolish multiple houses in the last year, and has many more unfit for human habitation, because of people cooking meth in them.

Given that the meth-ferals are sucking on the taxpayer teat at least thrice, (1) with their benefit-addiction (2) with their taxpayer-funded house, and (3) with their taxpayer-funded healthcare... why isn't any and every state housing tenant who has a meth-contaminated house during or after their sojourn being blacklisted for a minimally-reasonable period?*

* Let's say 40 years




... before becoming eligible for taxpayer-funded housing again?

H8ters, bring it on.

...not even 5/8ths of a rant...

[Akzle]

Yeah it's not Friday but you know what - screw it.

This afternoon, like very many of you inmates, I came home from a 12-hour-plus workday (at least five hours of which I worked just to pay taxes to the Black Hole of Cost-Effectiveness, Infernal Revenue, but I digress) to read that "Housing New Zealand - which we taxpayers fund entirely - "has had to demolish multiple houses in the last year, and has many more unfit for human habitation, because of people cooking meth in them.

Given that the meth-ferals are sucking on the taxpayer teat at least thrice, (1) with their benefit-addiction (2) with their taxpayer-funded house, and (3) with their taxpayer-funded healthcare... why isn't any and every state housing tenant who has a meth-contaminated house during or after their sojourn being blacklisted for a minimally-reasonable period?*

* Let's say 40 years

... before becoming eligible for taxpayer-funded housing again?

H8ters, bring it on.

to be clear. so you're okey with employed meth users?

Ill re-iterate that smoking crack in a building doesn't cause any known health issues.
Meanwhiles, Diesel exhaust is carcinogenic.

You crackers moan about dumb shit.

[Drew]

The houses are contaminated, they weren't used for cooking.

Those levels of contamination can be as low as 5micrograms per 100 square mm. That level can't be fucken toxic. I've smoked the stuff, it must take a fucken long time before the toxins cause a problem.

[sidecar bob]

You crackers moan about dumb shit.

Says the Jew bashing 'tard that dares to call me a racist.

[Akzle]

The houses are contaminated, they weren't used for cooking.

Those levels of contamination can be as low as 5micrograms per 100 square mm. That level can't be fucken toxic. I've smoked the stuff, it must take a fucken long time before the toxins cause a problem.

it isnt. Even the people who test for it state that there's no known safe exposure limit/levels.

A stack of jew cunts are making stacks of cash out of meth being a)illegal and b) scary.
And it isnt the cooks.

[Akzle]

Says the Jew bashing 'tard that dares to call me a racist.

are you just being obtuse? Ive explained that shit so many times my eyes are bleeding.

Well. No. The bleeding eyes is more likely injecting crack into them. But ive fucken explained this.

Stop being such a fucken jew.

[Grumph]

Yeah it's not Friday but you know what - screw it.

This afternoon, like very many of you inmates, I came home from a 12-hour-plus workday (at least five hours of which I worked just to pay taxes to the Black Hole of Cost-Effectiveness, Infernal Revenue, but I digress) to read that "Housing New Zealand - which we taxpayers fund entirely - "has had to demolish multiple houses in the last year, and has many more unfit for human habitation, because of people cooking meth in them.

Given that the meth-ferals are sucking on the taxpayer teat at least thrice, (1) with their benefit-addiction (2) with their taxpayer-funded house, and (3) with their taxpayer-funded healthcare... why isn't any and every state housing tenant who has a meth-contaminated house during or after their sojourn being blacklisted for a minimally-reasonable period?*

* Let's say 40 years

... before becoming eligible for taxpayer-funded housing again?

H8ters, bring it on.

Well I hope that ranting at least made you feel better - even if it was wrong on so many levels.....

I understand that the govt appointed group tasked with setting safe levels of P contamination will have it's first meeting tomorrow.
I also hear that it mainly consists of people from the cleanup industry.....Who have a major interest in earning money from the cleanups...
You may wish to go along and make a submission. Or not.

[husaberg]

Well I hope that ranting at least made you feel better - even if it was wrong on so many levels.....

I understand that the govt appointed group tasked with setting safe levels of P contamination will have it's first meeting tomorrow.
I also hear that it mainly consists of people from the cleanup industry.....Who have a major interest in earning money from the cleanups...
You may wish to go along and make a submission. Or not.

P labs are a cottage industry

[RDJ]

Well I hope that ranting at least made you feel better - even if it was wrong on so many levels.....

I understand that the govt appointed group tasked with setting safe levels of P contamination will have it's first meeting tomorrow.
I also hear that it mainly consists of people from the cleanup industry.....Who have a major interest in earning money from the cleanups...
You may wish to go along and make a submission. Or not.

The fact there has to be a cleanup industry at all is significant in itself. But not presently relevant to the point the taxpayer is subsidizing state-housed methheads on multiple levels. Since you seem to believe it's the 'right' thing to do, knock yourself out to send them more of your disposable income by all means.

It's one thing to have to deal with it at work. Try imagining you get to deal with this:

Because of the ability of methamphetamine to cause significant central nervous system (CNS) and psychiatric activation, patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) for acute intoxication often require physical restraint and pharmacologic intervention.

It's another thing to pay more tax to so you can fund more of the same. You surely know the rest of us have to contribute anyway even if we feel it's wrong on... what was your pet expression? oh yes, "so many levels".

Yeah, rant over.

[Drew]

The fact there has to be a cleanup industry at all is significant in itself. But not presently relevant to the point the taxpayer is subsidizing state-housed methheads on multiple levels. Since you seem to believe it's the 'right' thing to do, knock yourself out to send them more of your disposable income by all means.

It's one thing to have to deal with it at work. Try imagining you get to deal with this:

Because of the ability of methamphetamine to cause significant central nervous system (CNS) and psychiatric activation, patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) for acute intoxication often require physical restraint and pharmacologic intervention.

It's another thing to pay more tax to so you can fund more of the same. You surely know the rest of us have to contribute anyway even if we feel it's wrong on... what was your pet expression? oh yes, "so many levels".

Yeah, rant over.

Did you read the excerpt you quoted? "Acute intoxication" means 'really fucking high'.

[RDJ]

Did you read the excerpt you quoted? "Acute intoxication" means 'really fucking high'.

I read the full paper I quoted this from and more so I've dealt with such patients. Bear in mind that given the degree of intoxication it takes for users to get taken to the ER, the rest of 'em are not exactly strutting their stuff as peaceable gnomes in a happy garden of roses either.

[dangerous]

did not read all that, cant believe anyone can defend such shit BUT...

before moving out of that sess pit shit hole chch, i owned a house in halswell, next door was 2 housing nz flats, front unit the 2 people never came outside, why to scared to cos of the rear tenants... now I know the following info is fact it comes from well known legal source.

The house HNZ house was used for growing weed and manufacturing P it was patroled by dogs a hatchet hang out of the front door to warn others, the unit would go months with out people these people were young BP and had another HNZ house in hoonhay.
The shit I had to put up with pushed me to the limit a couple of times, to the point I took the little cunt on, nephew of the pres.
I called the police didnt give a fuck called HNZ didnt give a fuck... I gave up listening to the dogs crying one day was that bad I looked over the fence as the wee cunt was laying into a dog... called the SPCA YES they came around good bastards not sceard to sort shit out... put the dog down that had 3 broken legs removed the others... withen a week there were more back... the abuse the kids got was terable they dont have any chance of a decent life... ALL THANKS TO METH

So IMHO anyone cought withen 20sqm of P or knowen to be involved with 20yrs instant... if cought in a HNZ house LIFE there are decent people out there that need those houses.
P use goes beyond a individuals habit it involves kids animals and lots of other people... it is now in chch more common than cannabis

[RGVforme]

I suspect the aftermath from the boozers has more of a drain on your hard earned tax dollar over a lifetime than the tweakers.

I shudder to think how many Kidney transplants or liver treatments I have funded over the years though public health just so its there if I need it.All due to a substance you can freely buy almost anytime you have the money or in your weekly shop.