Cheers men! Cunt of situation really. I've been in constant contact with Justin Lester, and he got a Phil Becker of WCC to call me. The guy tells me, with 100% certainty, that there's no way under the health and safety act, that they can let me into my apartment, even for 5 mins to gather some personal possessions. I then see on Stuff, that Steve Tew and his Cronies were allowed access to a condemned building to retrieve some fucking trophies. I've asked for clarification of course.
News from Moto2 testing: Brad Binder has broken his arm. Jorge Navarro has dislocated a shoulder. One report said that Navarro dislocated the shoulder while trying to control the bike rather than when he hit the ground.
While neither of them will be very happy about their injuries, better now than mid season.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Before F1 clamped down on the aero, the cars could not get close to each other. Slipstreaming was out as they lost all downforce and braking. Who would want to see MotoGP where the bikes have a 'bubble' that is a no-go zone for others.
The simplest way is to ban wings rather than have an entire rule book just for aero?
The best way to forget all your troubles is to wear tight underpants.
Ahh, but your peasant needs concern them not!
Nah, I was against the wings from the outset, I'd hate to be out on track racing close only to get clipped by yet another sticky out bit on someones bike. Add the extra issues mentioned with the instability behind the bikes in the braking zone and you're going to effect the racing, which is what pays the bills and gets fans watching.
I'm sure the Ducati will be fine without the wings as what they lose on the exit of the corners they will gain in making the bike easier to ride going by the reports of the Andrea's on how hard it was to turn. There's got to be a more elegant was of creating the front downforce too, be interesting to see how they get around it. One thing is for sure is that every time they try and reduce costs the manufacturers spend more money on work arounds.
Was quite funny I was talking to a F1 nutrecently about racing and their DRS etc, he said it'll be on bikes soon enough.
I told him: mate, bikes invented DRS and the air brake well before cars and have been using it for years. He goes "Oh really, didn't know that" I said "Yeah, on the straights the rider tucks under the screen = DRS deployed. In the braking zones the rider sits up = Air brake deployed."
What actual evidence was there shown to support the "instability behind bikes in the braking zone" - anyhow?
Ducati will have the parent company's racing aero-engineering input to assist, with Audi having GTE/GT3 & DTM racing
experience at getting non-downforce road vehicles to make some, for racing purposes..
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
The riders complained about their bikes becoming unstable if they were in the slipstream of a winged bike. I don't know what you require as "actual evidence", nobody has suggested they were imagining the instability. Yet.
One rider, can't remember who, got whacked by the wing on another bike which made his leg numb. Following another incident there were wings left on the track. The riders have enough to concentrate on without unnecessary complications. Anyway the wings were fucking ugly, I will drink to their demise.![]()
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks