So how much do you know about Geo-Engineering?

[Katman]

http://www.mintpressnews.com/no-long...eering/218179/

[TheDemonLord]

http://www.mintpressnews.com/no-long...eering/218179/

I've got a plan to become a Multi-Billionaire.

Does that mean I'm now a Multi-Billionaire?

[Katman]

I've got a plan to become a Multi-Billionaire.

Does that mean I'm now a Multi-Billionaire?

See, there's another one of your shit analogies.

[TheDemonLord]

See, there's another one of your shit analogies.

I think you mean:

'There's another whole in my shit conspiracy theories'

But we know that you are allergic to Facts and reality.

[Katman]

http://www.collective-evolution.com/...l-on-cbs-news/

[Drew]

http://www.collective-evolution.com/...l-on-cbs-news/

In a lab, they can do it. They haven't tried real world testing.

You are a fuckwit.

[Katman]

They haven't tried real world testing.

Really Drew?

Or are you just guessing?

[Drew]

Really Drew?

Or are you just guessing?

So you give an interview of a scientist sating their working on it, and then suggest he's lying about what he's done?

You really are a fucken idiot.

"Look at me, I've spent lots of time looking up stuff. I'm far more educated than anyone who can't be fucked with the bullshit".

Look you thick cunt. Most of us know the technology exists to do it. We don't think the are doing it though. And I've yet to see conclusive reason not to fucking do it if they've got a safe method.

So fuck up, fuck off, and die of some curable disease that you didn't trust a medical professional's opinion on.

[husaberg]

You are a fuckwit.

Really Drew?

Or are you just guessing?

Nah hes right, you are a fuckwit.

You're talking about a government agency spouting the government's story.
Think about it.

For a start, NIST is a government agency. Do you really expect them to say anything other than what they're told to say?
What have the likes of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth got to gain from disputing the official story - other than uncovering the truth?

Who the fuck are you (or any government agency for that matter) to decide who is capable of evaluating information?

I think you place a little too much importance on the role of the US government's Chief Executive Puppet.

But you blindly believe that a building can collapse at free fall speed due to the failure of a single column simply because a government agency said their computer model confirms it.
Oh, by the way, you're not allowed to look at how they got their computer model to show that result - that's a secret.

How's that?
NIST are merely a government puppet.

I don't think the government accepted NIST's advice.
I think they told NIST what NIST's advice would be.

My only 'belief' in this particular matter is that people should be entitled to the truth regarding any risks involved.
And when a government agency is guilty of hiding the truth there this is very good cause to be alarmed.

[Katman]

So you give an interview of a scientist sating their working on it, and then suggest he's lying about what he's done?

You really are a fucken idiot.

"Look at me, I've spent lots of time looking up stuff. I'm far more educated than anyone who can't be fucked with the bullshit".

Look you thick cunt. Most of us know the technology exists to do it. We don't think the are doing it though. And I've yet to see conclusive reason not to fucking do it if they've got a safe method.

So fuck up, fuck off, and die of some curable disease that you didn't trust a medical professional's opinion on.

Seriously dude, you should see about getting your medication changed.

[Drew]

Seriously dude, you should see about getting your medication changed.

You should try and make a decent argument for once.

[Katman]

You should try and make a decent argument for once.

Let's not forget which one of us is the mentally unstable one Drew.

[Akzle]

I thought this would be about actual science.

I went to a lecture last night, given by an actual scientist. It was entitled "What will an Alpine Fault Earthquake Feel like"

The short answer is "rather scary".

The lecturer is a Professor at Canterbury, and spent a fair bit of time talking about the modelling of earthquake data. The idea of that was to see if their theoretical models match the data recorded from the Canterbury quakes. They pretty much do. Note this is not predicting an EQ, it is "given the size and location of the rupture, and our knowledge of the geology, and geomorphology of the area, can we model the effects?".

Turns out that they can. So the prediction was a 400km long rupture on the alpine fault, moving south north, and with around 11m of lateral movement. It produces a 7.9M EQ which propagates over the entire south island and rings that motherfucker like a bell. For (get this) three or so minutes. The "felt" peak ground accelerations will be less than from February (because that motherfucker was right under the city) but it goes on for a looooooong time.

And it is not IF, it is when. The last major alpine fault EQ was in 1717. The average is 310 years and the range is from 200 to 500 years over an 8000 year observed range.

Science, bitches. Its amazing.

Oh yeah: you NOrth Islanders: dont get smug. There is a huge subduction zone to the east of the North Island in the sea. It is entirely capable of generating a M9 EQ. (like Tohatsu in Japan in 2011). Guess what? motherfucking tsunami.

We're all fucked.

That's what you mean by geo-engineering, right?

Also: UC puts these things up on their website: absolutely worth looking at. We've been to a few of them on a whole range of topics. Very worthwhile.

Here's the youtube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...0DE06F56864BA4


Do check out the Mars Rover one. It was given by Jennifer Blank, an actual NASA scientist.

'zat chu ken ring?

[Laava]

Let's not forget which one of us is the mentally unstable one Drew.

Oh fuck, that is funny!!!

[Katman]

Oh fuck, that is funny!!!

Don't laugh at him - he's coping the best he can.