Originally Posted by Katman
He far too narcisistic to notice Demon
Ironic here is henny Penny calling someone Chicken little.
Anorak
He far too narcisistic to notice Demon
Ironic here is henny Penny calling someone Chicken little.
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Forum whore
You forgot the medical professionals, the university professors and the research scientists.
The Majestic Metal Wizard
No I didn't... I included all 3 of them.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Forum whore
The Majestic Metal Wizard
Look at the citations:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmr...218/citations/
Do you notice how the same names keep popping up?
You know what the best irony is? When I made a joke about "all 3 of them" I was specifically thinking about L Tomljenovic and CA Shaw - who have penned a large number of all the works that you reference.
Hint: That is the very definition of an Echo Chamber - no one else cites them or takes them seriously - they are fringe/crank/conspiracy researchers and are in no way indicative of any wider scientific opinion or evidence.
They are the scientific equivalent of the Homeless man standing on the corner with a sign saying "The end is Nigh!" screeching at the top of his lungs.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Forum whore
Well I count 25 different names just in that one citation list.
And who gives a fuck how many times a particular name comes up? It might just suggest they're a specialist in that field.
How about the names in the list of references in the other link?
Should we count their names too?
Seriously dude, you take willful ignorance to a whole new level.
Forum whore
Has anyone got any sensible theories as to why Thimerosal was removed from most childhood vaccines back in 2001?
111000101000100010011110
It was replaced with something that performed better.
It was found to not be required.
A cheaper alternative became available.
Now if your theory doesn't fit one of those, that'll be because it's a conspiracy theory rather than one backed by evidence.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
Well that's odd, because the CDC seem to think it was removed as a 'precautionary measure'.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/pat...lor-office.pdf
111000101000100010011110
So was it replaced? or not required?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
Or was it not as safe as they thought it was?
111000101000100010011110
Obviously not; now was it replaced, or was it just removed?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Forum whore
And notice how they specifically say that ethyl mercury is cleared from the blood more quickly the methyl mercury?
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/pat...lor-office.pdf
But what if the ethyl mercury is making it's way into the brain of some vaccine recipients?
Does it clear from the brain in the same manner?
Forum whore
So are you saying it's obviously not as safe as they thought it was?
111000101000100010011110
Obviously. You'd almost think the ability to re-evaluate the efficacy of vaccines when new evidence comes to light it a good thing; well, those of sane mind would think that at any rate. Other morons would take try to make the point that since they got it wrong once, we can just assume they are wrong all the time and skip that whole pesky evidence bit
So what was your point?
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 19 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 19 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks