
Originally Posted by
TheDemonLord
X is a GUI Framework, and it's filled with AIDS, and whilst there are many many alternatives and you can indeed customize them, Put it this way - most people buy a Car or a Bike, as opposed to building one from scratch or as a Kit Car.
Sure, you can customize a Kit Car more, and there are a Plethora of bits YOU CAN CHOOSE - but most people purchase a car for the immediate function it can provides - Just like Windows. Again, If Linux was as truly superior in this regard (as you claim) then more people would use it, they don't because most people who have used a Linux Gui go "Eugh!". In fact I remember for a while around 2008-2010 that Dick Smith, Harvey Norman and PBtech were selling PCs prebuilt with Ubuntu - they don't any more - that should be a hint....
AD and Windows, with MS Exchange - it's the Holy Trinity - point is, you can't run AD on Linux, so if you want AD (and all the lovely features therein) you are running Windows - and that, my Dear Akzle is why so many businesses run Windows.
Yes and Yes - there are people who like .Net and people who like ASP and until the advent of .Net Core - if you wanted that, you need Windows.
Yes - that one is factually correct - Windows has the most compatible programs for it.
Yes. Multiple times. Have you ever tried to call Linus Torvald?
MSSQL has the least number of Vulnerabilities and Data breaches consistently when compared to MySQL, Oracle and Postgres.
Doom wasn't developed by the Open Source community.... That's my point, hence it was in a consistent state before being ported. Interestingly enough, now it's in the public domain - we have Zdoom, Jdoom etc. etc. all thanks to Open Source.
Which is entirely the point I'm making - Devs do what Devs want to do, with no restriction - the result is forks, half developed applications, Applications which are called differently depending on the Distros.
Those 2 statements are mutually exclusive:
If there is no choice - there is perfect consistency - everything is the same
If there is Infinite choice, there is perfect inconsistency - nothing in the same
If I jump onto just about any Windows box - I can be guaranteed that notepad is installed, Jump onto any Linux box - is it Vi? Vim? Nano? Emacs (just joking - it's never Emacs)?
That consistency means I don't have to spend 5 minutes faffing around guessing which text editor they happen to have installed.
Seen - or Used? 2 very different realities.
When it comes to end user experience, it's not an argumentum ad populum to say that the OS that has the greatest numbers of End Users must have the best End user Experience - which is.......
WINDOWS!
Bookmarks