Maybe I wasn't paying attention, but I don't recall ever reading a police statement as to the make of bullet used in a crime. I can see how they might request information from the public to assist with identifying something, but to just make gratuitous announcements doesn't seem realistic. Then again Trump is prez, who can say what is realistic?
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Multiple shooters in multiple locations.
AR15 meltdown just for fun.
simple question, why did the Soviets modify a air-raid shelter into a gas chamber? what was their intention?
not sure wherethe reports come from, police, coroners, whatever. but they do come out.
i think it was k-marts hollow points that were used in the last school shoot up.
but mostly the media just beats it up. "cop killer" bullets and the whatnot.
I've an idea (correct or not) that winchester only sell their talon slugs to teh govt.
Friends Of Jihad In CIA-FBI Intimidate Vegas Victims http://www.rense.com/general96/friendsofjihad.htmlThe parasitical enemy within? - Goodbye USA?
![]()
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
So still no news on whether the ammo Stephen Paddock shot off was all of the same calibre?
I think both yourself and the video is making a fair few assumptions:
https://www.federalpremium.com/ammun...aliber/223-rem
Same Calibre, same Manufacturer but different projectiles gives a variance of 3700 FPS to 2720 FPS - who is to say that he only bought one specific weight of projectile?
Not to mention we are also assuming that they are fired from the same rifle, with the same barrell length.
Interesting video - but it's making assumptions (not entirely unreasonable ones, mind) that it doesn't have the evidence to support.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Who said it was being ignored? In the Video - he's pointing to the Audio delay between impact and report as conclusive proof of a second shooter. It's not conclusive because it makes some very key assumptions - for which he doesn't have the evidence to make.
Another thought on this is that we are also assuming that the distance of the microphone between the impact and the shooter is constant and approximately at the point of Impact.
For example - if the microphone was moved to closer to the base of the Hotel, the lag would decrease (since the sound wave for the report propagates out from the Muzzle of the Rifle, whereas the Sound wave from the Impact propagates out from the point of Impact).
I'm saying that the Video (whilst interesting) jumps to a conclusion, based on some assumptions (even if they are relatively reasonable) and presents it as gospell fact.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks