The American (USA) 2016 presidential elections thread?

[oldrider]

I do question the wisdom of upending such a bucket of piss as that video while trying to sort through the flood of trash...

Question all you like - it's called freedom to decide for yourself - there is a lot less of it about than there used to be! - soon what is left may be taken from you too.

[mashman]

What I was taking issue with is the complete rubbish being pushed about how Clinton was paid millions to sell uranium to the Russians. That is errant rubbish. I wasn't sure if she was actually Secretary of Styate at the time. Apparently she was, but the Secretary is not normally involved directly in the process, and anyway is but one of nine on the committee.

(Hopefully) and amazingly, here is Shep Smith of Fox News. The Fox viewers are up in arms and want him sacked because of this. The dim fucks would rather have fairy stories than facts. God forrbid anyone would disturb their misconceptions.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Fox+news+s...ai=RnsAZzsdI1U

It's not something I'd put past them. After all, some people go to great lengths to feather their own nest. Some even create pathways for vehicles to enter and exit warzones full of "acquired" oil whilst working for people who get Nobel Peace Prizes for increasing the number of bombs dropped securing peace. Kind of makes uranium selling to whoever, not Russia, but a human being that may happen to be Russian, look like petty crime. That and her rhetoric concerning Iran/Iraq/Libya/Syria etc... and the funding of ISIS that is no longer conspiracy. The odds are stacked against her being squeaky clean simply because she was in a position of responsibility. After all, covering positions of authority would be something that sexual predators would do in order to control their victims. I do not see these sorts of things as outwith the realms of reality.

I'm sure Shep is fantastic and unbiased in his reporting.

As the man said when he posted the video, "Interesting (Trump) times coming up? Has Trump remained focussed after all?".

[Graystone]

Question all you like - it's called freedom to decide for yourself - there is a lot less of it about than there used to be! - soon what is left may be taken from you too.

Try as you might, you and the other conspiracy theorists won't take my freedom to make an informed decision.

[oldrider]

Try as you might, you and the other conspiracy theorists won't take my freedom to make an informed decision.

Try a 180 degree turn on that comment - there is nothing more that I want than your continued freedom to make your own informed decisions!

[Graystone]

Try a 180 degree turn on that comment - there is nothing more that I want than your continued freedom to make your own informed decisions!

Then why spread misinformation? The torrent of garbage comes more from conspiracy theorists than it does official sources.

[oldrider]

Then why spread misinformation? The torrent of garbage comes more from conspiracy theorists than it does official sources.

Show me again where any of my posts say compulsory reading/viewing - anybody who looks at them does so of their own free will and decides upon the value (or not) of it to themselves!

[Graystone]

Show me again where any of my posts say compulsory reading/viewing - anybody who looks at them does so of their own free will and decides upon the value (or not) of it to themselves!

You are spreading misinformation, that people can look at them or not is irrelevant. The relevant information is being drowned out in the flood of bullshit, which hampers people's ability to make an informed choice, just look at how Trump got elected.

[Katman]

You are spreading misinformation....

How the fuck would you know whether any of it constitutes 'misinformation'?

[Graystone]

How the fuck would you know whether any of it constitutes 'misinformation'?

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de...misinformation

[Katman]

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de...misinformation

Like I thought - you wouldn't have a fucking clue.

[Woodman]

How the fuck would you know whether any of it constitutes 'misinformation'?

How do you know it isn't?

[Katman]

How do you know it isn't?

I'm not the one giving it a label.

[Woodman]

I'm not the one giving it a label.

Oh so you were talking about earwigs then

[oldrider]

You are spreading misinformation, that people can look at them or not is irrelevant. The relevant information is being drowned out in the flood of bullshit, which hampers people's ability to make an informed choice, just look at how Trump got elected.

Thats simply the way that you choose to interpret and believe - you sound (to me) like you would like to be a member of the thought police.

[Katman]

Oh so you were talking about earwigs then

Earwigs?

Have you been drinking again?