Oh gawd - it's Friday afternoon and my brain is dead.
I don't know if I can be bothered defending Marx right now - I'm only into his structural sociology - I certain can't defend his political solutions ..
I'll take the weekend to find my brain again - and maybe get back to you ..
But I think I have made my original point - Marx said his solution was historic necessity - and therefore, to "try communism" was to immediately fail ..
Yes - Marx was wrong.
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Post #87
BB / DL,
An Interesting discussion. Thanks.
One question to DL. You mention that dictatorships have always implemented
a left wing ideology. Can you give me an example or three to illustrate ?
Cheers,
Viking
Not quite what I said - I said Far-Left Ideology always ends in Dictatorship:
Chairman Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, The Kims etc.
There's been a few Far-right Dictators too, but there doesn't seem to be the same correlation between a Far-right political belief and dictatorship, that there appears to be with the Far-Left. Although in saying that, I'd say it's inline with Horseshoe theory to say that at a certain distance away from the political centre, a Dictatorship become inevitable.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
I was thinking on this very thing - and I think I can put forward an explanation as to why in the historical record - we see that Extreme left wing always produces a Dictator and the Extreme right only sometimes does.
I talked earlier about the Left not wanting to exclude people or to draw borders around thing (this is a temperamental trait of people who identify as Left) whereas the Right are all about having borders between things (again a temperamental thing) - and it's this that I think means that the Left are more susceptible to Dictators - the group is unwilling to expel a rotten apple, in the same way that the Right wing is generally more happy to do.
However, that doesn't address the opposite - then I thought on one of the most right-wing organizations - the Military. And this is my conjecture - in the Military, you have Ranks. In theory - an advance in Rank is made on the basis of Competence, decided by a group of superiors. Right up until you get to the top brass - so, who leads ultimately? The person who is determined by their peers as the most competent to lead.
This is what I think (somewhat) protects a far-right viewpoint from Dictatorship - that the person who leads is put their by a consensus of their Peers AND that right-wing types are happy to expel someone who falls outside of where they happen to draw the boundary.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
If we are talking about 'climate engineering' which is the specific meaning, I accept the theory, I accept that it is possible and that it was seriously explored. I accept that it is still being looked at in relation to mitigating greenhouse gasses and global warming.
I do not accept what the conspiracy people tell us that geo-engineering is being undertaken in secret for nefarious purposes e.g. putting toxic chemicals in the atmoshpere, creating an atmospheric super-weapon, making people sick to the benefit of the drugs companies etc.
Grow older but never grow up
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks