
Originally Posted by
Drew
I wanna know if all the private home owners get to claim against the arbitrary standards that cost them thousands.
A class action lawsuit would be good. I took 90% of the clean up costs of a property I bought off the purchase price. Been tenanted so it needed new interior paint,wallpaper and carpet anyway so no big deal $ wise just the two weeks it took. Really its the seller who is out of pocket... I probably could have done the dulux overcoat with sealer and sugarsoap but better to have it done right to start with and certified clean for resale value.
And I would have bought it uncontaminated at its advertised price anyway if clean as it ticked all my boxes and supply was scarce...
It will be interesting to see what line insurance companies take, this has cost them dearly, most house policies you can claim up to 30k for meth damage so it has been costing them....
I think baseline testing should be compulsory on all sales and new rental agreements, via real estate or building report. Then a new STATE agency would come in and do full quantitive testing free of charge. The cost of this would be passed on to the previous occupiers along with an instant fine for association with meth use and all the relevant data passed on to police who would soon have a data map of drug users to lead them to dealers and then cooks.
Drug users that are state housing tenants (prob all as under new data share private landlords would know and not rent to you) would all gradually be moved into one suburb that would be gated with no children or elderly allowed to live there. Since drug use is harmless im sure the police, fire and ambulance would be happy to not visit this suburb at all for any reason or any other help agency....
Then just let Darwin take its course.....
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Bookmarks