https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12118007
Blimey $600k for a tin shed in Papakura.
"Families will be getting more than their money's worth," Twyford said.
Wot a joke.
+ if you work in the city you get to drive in bumper to bumper traffic crawl for an hour or so....or if you get up really early you can park at the Park n Ride and train it.
Thats what happens when you have GFC, lower interest rates and flood the place with cheap finance to kick start the economy....people buy
assets and the prices go up.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Papakura - little boxes, little boxes everywhere
value for money - yeah, nah
![]()
READ AND UDESTAND
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Very true - but what are the alternatives?![]()
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Maybe it has always been the norm - the common denominator is people and we are all products of the the same process turned out by almost identical factories.
The narrow margin for difference is possibly why division and deception are such effective tools in controlling the masses? - Develop need and exploit greed?![]()
We'll I don't know what that means but it's very nice up there at the right time of year. And obviously on secure ground rather than bedding down with rather Snappy apex predators. Guess the problem might fix itself.
Hard issue for sure. If people in power would stop being such cunts, everyone could stay at home tending their fields or whatever they make a living doing.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Basically a sleep-out garage with a designer "decor". A fucking insulting approach to housing.
Quite a lot actually.
First, NZ needs to get away from this mentality of "Must have a 1/4 acre section with a house on it" for it to be considered housing.
Second, apartments are the way forward to big-city living at an affordable price.
Third, anyone who wants a large section to maintain while sitting indoors fucking around on their "mobile-devices" cannot complain about being arse-raped by the council for exorbitant rate bills and hoses being "unaffordable".
Additionally, there are the beginnings of proper public transport due to an increased centralized population base which demands (& can fund) these systems.
Lots of options. Just fuckwits demanding a house & land that they don't really need or can't pay for. Buy small, get onto the property ladder, move up from there.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
[First] Thought that had long since disappeared - less is more in most applications for today IMO. (people don't tend/need to grow or farm food any more now.)
[Second] Agree.
[Third] Agree - horses for courses, property should be fit for purpose and needs rather than "affluence" metering and measuring.
[additionally] Most people (in NZ) believe public transport is for "other people" to use.
Older people should be encouraged more to downsize according to their diminishing family requirements.
I.E. there are lots of old people still tied up to their almost empty family sized homes with sections to match that they can't physically look after any-more!
What a waste of space.
They havent even taken a 9hour plane ride to study how governments of high density populations were handling the problem with ease over 20 years ago.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hous...elopment_Board
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks