The journey that COVID-19 will take us on

[Katman]

You are confused though, as there werre investigation into alleged insider trading after 911 they found no evidence of insider trading.

By the 9/11 Commission.

You know - the one that was "set up to fail".

[husaberg]

By the 9/11 Commission.

You know - the one that was "set up to fail".

You are confused though, as there werre investigation into alleged insider trading after 911 they found no evidence of insider trading.
Do you have some evidence of some insider trading prior to 911 by people other than those directly related to the attack. ie the terrorists and their organization.

Lets see is it a fact as usual have no evidence though.........
Do you understand it is a fact that both the FBI and the SEC investigated the rumors of insider trading and that both reported they uncovered no evidence..

Investigations by the SEC and the FBI “uncovered no evidence"

Isntit odd that you consider yourself to be etter at identifuying insider trading than SEC and the FBI.
Its almost like how you claim to have more knowledge about Medicine and vaccine safety than the doctors and scientist do.........
What experience and qualification qualifies you above the SEC and FBI investigators Stevo?

[Katman]

Do you understand it is a fact that both the FBI and the SEC investigated the rumors of insider trading and that both reported they uncovered no evidence..

All you're doing is quoting the 9/11 Commission report.

You know - the commission that was "set up to fail".

[husaberg]

All you're doing is quoting the 9/11 Commission report.
".

really The FBI and the SEC investigated the rumours neither found any evidence the fact you have had two opportunities to list the evidence you have and you have yet to offer a single piece of evidence suggests you as normal have no evidence.
It also seems you have no logical basis to claim you have superior abilities of investigation abilities beyond the FBI or THE SEC either.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-98.htm

Dennis Lormel
Chief, Financial Crimes Section, FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation "we have examined three transactions involving individuals in San Diego. Based on all of the evidence, we have concluded that none of these transactions involved a net transfer of funds to the hijackers."

Do you have any evidence that the FBI and the SEC did not investigate the rumours?
becuase both the SEC and the FBI say they did.
I look forward to your rebuttal that will not cover any of the facts that you clearly have no facts at.

[Katman]

You'll be quoting NIST next.

[MaxPenguin]

Ah yes. You mean like those senators did when they sold of millions in stocks each after a confidential briefing on the likely effects of the virus?
And as yet nobody has been charged with insider trading, even the one who is married to the CEO of the NY Stock Exchange - who also, by a remarkable coincidence, unloaded millions of dollars worth of shares at the same time as his wife.

Oh, and a random thought that has been bothering me for a few days now: The way things are going, in a week or two Trumps idiocy and incompetence and the virus will have killed more Americans than Ho Chi Minh and General Giap managed during an entire war.

Pretty sure that members of the Senate cannot be charged with insider trading. Basically to protect them as they have private investments as well as being politicians, and are privy to info that everyday investors aren't. But they do have a moral obligation to be impartial and not act on the insider info they get.
Ask yourself the question, would you unload the shares if you knew what they KNEW?

[Katman]

Do you have any evidence that the FBI and the SEC did not investigate the rumours?

See this quote here.....

Dennis Lormel
Chief, Financial Crimes Section, FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation "we have examined three transactions involving individuals in San Diego. Based on all of the evidence, we have concluded that none of these transactions involved a net transfer of funds to the hijackers."

That's all the FBI investigated - whether the transfer of funds went to the hijackers.

The real question has to be, 'who did the transfer of funds go to?'

That's who should have been charged with insider trading.

[husaberg]

That shouldn't come as any surprise.

No-one's been charged over the insider trading that went on immediately before 9/11 either.

You know the one - the one where they said no-one could have envisaged planes flying into buildings.

Except they were conducting a military exercise at the time that included the scenario of planes flying into buildings.

It's all very confusing.

You are confused though, as there werre investigation into alleged insider trading after 911 they found no evidence of insider trading.
Do you have some evidence of some insider trading prior to 911 by people other than those directly related to the attack. ie the terrorists and their organization.

By the 9/11 Commission.

You know - the one that was "set up to fail".

Lets see is it a fact as usual have no evidence though.........
Do you understand it is a fact that both the FBI and the SEC investigated the rumors of insider trading and that both reported they uncovered no evidence..


Isntit odd that you consider yourself to be etter at identifuying insider trading than SEC and the FBI.
Its almost like how you claim to have more knowledge about Medicine and vaccine safety than the doctors and scientist do.........
What experience and qualification qualifies you above the SEC and FBI investigators Stevo?

All you're doing is quoting the 9/11 Commission report.

You know - the commission that was "set up to fail".

really The FBI and the SEC investigated the rumours neither found any evidence the fact you have had two opportunities to list the evidence you have and you have yet to offer a single piece of evidence suggests you as normal have no evidence.
It also seem you have no logical basis to claim you have superior abilities of investigation abilities beyond the FBI or THE SEC either.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-98.htm




Do you have any evidence that the FBI and the SEC did not investigate the rumours?
becuase both the SEC and the FBI say they did.
I look forward to your rebuttal that will not cover any of the facts that you clearly have no facts at.

See this quote here.....



That's all the FBI investigated - whether the transfer of funds went to the hijackers.

The real question has to be, 'who did the transfer of funds go to?'

That's who should have been charged with insider trading.

Lets see spin a lie and then try and act like you were right..................
by ignoring all the facts that clearly show you were entirely and utterly wrong.

[Katman]

...and act like you were right..................

Unfortunately for you, it ain't no act.

[pritch]

Pretty sure that members of the Senate cannot be charged with insider trading.

Sorry, wrong.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkel.../#4e3d601d4a45

And then there was Congressman Collins who was sentenced to 26 months jail recently for using information received through his position in share trades..

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...son/ar-BBZ4BOZ

[husaberg]

Unfortunately for you, it ain't no act.

You are not fooling anyone stevo
https://www.psychologytoday.com/nz/b...ep-down-inside
As because, despite your allegations, your claims, your posturing and your denials . Its irrefutable (to anyone that is logical and of sound mind), that both the FBI and the SEC investigated the allegations and found no evidence of insider trading and its clear that both of the organisations are far more qualified than you are.

[MaxPenguin]

Sorry, wrong.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkel.../#4e3d601d4a45

And then there was Congressman Collins who was sentenced to 26 months jail recently for using information received through his position in share trades..

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...son/ar-BBZ4BOZ

Ok, good info. I was wrong by the looks of it, still my question stands.

[pritch]

Ok, good info. I was wrong by the looks of it, still my question stands.

Briefly? No. I have no desire to share a cell with big Bubba.

[pritch]

If this is true, can a vaccine even be a possibility?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...s-latest-news/

[husaberg]

Trump has likely done his last Q&A

---

Trump Twitter “What is the purpose of having White House News Conferences when the Lamestream Media asks nothing but hostile questions, & then refuses to report the truth or facts accurately,”

Trump Twitter “Was just informed that the Fake News from the Thursday White House Press Conference had me speaking & asking questions of Dr. Deborah Birx. Wrong, I was speaking to our Laboratory expert, not Deborah, about sunlight etc. & the CoronaVirus. The Lamestream Media is corrupt & sick!” he tweeted.

The transcript released by the White House shows that he did direct a question to Birx.

“Deborah, have you ever heard of that? The heat and the light, relative to certain viruses, yes, but relative to this virus –” Trump asked her.
“Not as a treatment,” Birx responded cautiously. “I mean, certainly fever is a good thing.”

Trump then claims

"I was asking a question sarcastically to reporters ... to see what would happen," the president said on Friday as he signed another coronavirus relief bill into law. He had faced a torrent of ridicule for his comments, which were directed at doctors on his coronavirus taskforce, not at reporters.

Shortly after Vice President Mike Pence delivered his mutterings.
Trump walked directly out as reporters shouted from the gallery "is now the time for sarcasm?"​