Thinking of getting vaccinated?

[Katman]

Stumbling drunk?
Interesting in that only a muppet would believe its claims.
The article you linked goesback to the Russian propaganda site RT news.
What's funny is the claim in the actual article linked to the rt russian propaganda site knowfor making up shit doesn't even back the claims the article makes.


Yet in the RT article


https://www.rt.com/news/164884-irish...ndal-vaccines/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bon_Se..._and_Baby_Home

The article doesn't say that 2051 children died.

It says 2051 children may have been 'subjected to the practice'.

[husaberg]

The article doesn't say that 2051 children died.

It says 2051 children may have been 'subjected to the practice'.

May have been oh shit well that's damning evidence to put it in an article about vaccine safety. Well, for an antivaxxer it is....

The title of the linked article reads The Century of Evidence Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
One would make assumptions that in the article was some actual evidence of anything other ten antivaxer guilt.
Let's see, whilst i am sure you are okay to include this sort of claptrap in an article about vaccine safety, especially since even the source material doesn't even reach the same conclusions?

So, are you really okay with just making stuff up to back your cause?
They put dubious clickbait crap like this in these articles, as their core market is gullible idiots. (ie antivaxers)
The actual trial mentioned involved 120 infants from all over Ireland.

So to include it as evidence, especially considering that the trials weren't even conducted at that home in the first place is ludicrous.
The homes that were involved Madonna House, St Patrick's Home, the Bird's Nest, and the Cottage Home in Dun Laoghaire.

Just to clarify, none of these locations is where the mass grave was found, which was at Bon Secours Mother and Baby Home in Tuam.

The likelihood that any of the bodies in a grave over a span of about 50 years are linked to vaccine damage from "secret vaccine" trials for diphtheria carried out elsewhere is about as probable as you admitting you're a narcissistic jerk.
it also says the trials were "covertly tested" "secret trials", yet it's an undeniable fact that these trials were published in medical journals. its also very clear that we consented by the medical officers at the homes.
The fact that your team are always grasping at these straws while you use semantics to attempt to defend them shows your total lack of objectivity and a total lack of any credibility.