So lets have a conversation that includes a distinction between those who need support, and a'holes who don't.
Trying to justify / validate giving my hard earnt money, to a'holes who don't, by using examples of those who genuinely need my support, is illogical, and at best a waste of electrons.
I know one, he is my brother (sort of rhymes with stoner?),... anyway several times over the years he told me that he was bored with working (or whatever), so he regularly went back on the dole. He kept telling me what is (un)employment status was until one day I told him what I realy thought. It was quite a short conversation.
To this day he never mentions it .....
So for me, the real issue is here is how do we tell the difference between the two.
Drug testing seems a good suggestion to me to start to find the difference. There are probably some others too but that would be off topic?
Amen to that mate. You hit the nail on the head!!!![]()
Me, I'm was bored with my previous jobs, but I didnt go on the dole, I used a part of my savings to take 6 monthes off. When that ran out I worked until I'd topped up the savings again and had saved enough for some time off again. Me I can work and afford to do what I want and would rather not go on the benefit. I recently gave a mate of mine a rev up about how he hadnt held a job for very long in the 3 years after he left school. He was just bludging of his parents and the dole. We went and found him a job as a decky on a boat within a week and hes a new guy now, not bored, can afford to fix his car and still has money in his pocket. I'm all for drug testing people on the benefit unless you have a good and valid reason such as been a caregiver or something.
"I came into this game for the action, the excitement... go anywhere, travel light,... get in, get out,... wherever there's trouble, a man alone... Now they got the whole country sectioned off; you can't make a move without a form."
Paved roads are just another example of wasted tax payer dollars.
Fair points.
Your daughter can work according to what you say and personally I hope she does find something she enjoys when she is ready and works till she happily retires of old age.
I'm talking about the lowlifes who should work but can't. I've cleaned toilets, flipped burgers and done what it takes in my day, there are always jobs available for those willing to work and willing to put the effort in.
Sure, there are exceptions but there are plenty of people as smart and capable as you who choose to sit on the dole. Maybe 5% a month is more appropriate a drop off.
"I came into this game for the action, the excitement... go anywhere, travel light,... get in, get out,... wherever there's trouble, a man alone... Now they got the whole country sectioned off; you can't make a move without a form."
Paved roads are just another example of wasted tax payer dollars.
I think they should start giving out vouchers instead of hard cash, for supermarkets and the warehouse etc, and they should pay the rent money straight to the landllord or housing nz.
I don't have to pass a urine test; nor AIUI do most of the working population. I assume the reason someone in the timber industry does is for safety reasons. There are no special safety issues with either sitting on the couch or looking for work.
Sure, that's a problem. But that's different from cutting off their money, and therefore their ability to live.Please understand – I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their arse drinking piss & smoking dope all day.
Ha. That's a recipe for a nice balanced discussion. Not.Please pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.
That's the main reason I join in these political discussions - otherwise a casual observer could conclude that my opinions are in line with the majority of kiwibiker expressed opinions. I live in hope that there are many who disagree with those expressed opinons who can't be bothered or can't see the point in disagreeing.
Richard
There are varying degrees of such problems.
As soon as you label someone (or insist that they declare themselves) as having a "mental problem", for one thing you'll reduce their self-esteem and probably make the problem worse, and for another make it much harder to get a job in the future - who'd want to employ someone with a 'mental problem'?
For example: I have spent time on the dole (though not spending it on drink or drugs) with motivational problems, but I'm not permanently unemployable.
Richard
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks