Max Heslehurst needs finding

[Laava]

Please can you provide video footage of all actions taken. Love to see justice being served red hot!!

[Paul in NZ]

Please can you provide video footage of all actions taken. Love to see justice being served red hot!!

And then hand yourself in to the Police...

[ManDownUnder]

And then hand yourself in to the Police...

LOL oh no - this is all beiong done on the right side of that thin blue line ... just...

[Paul in NZ]

LOL oh no - this is all beiong done on the right side of that thin blue line ... just...

Oh - I have no doubt mate - it's just the youtube type idea of filming the thing and posting it on here... good grief... Why not film yourself doing 300kph and send it to the cops as well..

Personally I don't care if you roll up the thin blue line and freeze it overnight and beat him soundly with it... I'd say he has that coming and more...

[ManDownUnder]

Oh - I have no doubt mate - it's just the youtube type idea of filming the thing and posting it on here... good grief... Why not film yourself doing 300kph and send it to the cops as well..

Personally I don't care if you roll up the thin blue line and freeze it overnight and beat him soundly with it... I'd say he has that coming and more...

LOLOL... points all taken mate. I'd have no problems with that meself except I'm a goody two shoes and it's all pretty bloody public a la the YouTube example you gave.

[ManDownUnder]

Back on topic... Max Heslehurst - how do I find him?

[vifferman]

Back on topic... Max Heslehurst - how do I find him?

If you have a cellphone number, can't you come up with some enticing reason for him to meet up with you?

[ManDownUnder]

If you have a cellphone number, can't you come up with some enticing reason for him to meet up with you?

That works well if he would only answer it... which he doesn't... (not that I've given up trying LOL... ). Supressed numbers, different numbers called from etc.

[Edbear]

That works well if he would only answer it... which he doesn't... (not that I've given up trying LOL... ). Supressed numbers, different numbers called from etc.

Could try a sexy woman's voice....?

[vifferman]

That works well if he would only answer it... which he doesn't... (not that I've given up trying LOL... ). Supressed numbers, different numbers called from etc.

txt him your avatar, and suggest meeting for a drink?

[Motu]

Same Christian name as his music teacher.

[Wolf]

Can I suggest an er unusual avenue -DEFINITELY explain to the missus why you are doing it.
Check out the online dating sites -Reading the article I suspect he's hunting for his next sugar mummy as we speak.

Heh, set up a profile claiming to be the sort of female he typically preys on - then get ready for a deluge of cock pics...

[oldrider]

You are in Auckland, take a contract out on his kneecaps! John.

[HenryDorsetCase]

Sue the lawyer for malpractice!

the typical scenario here in NZ is that the first time a lawyer sees a contract is AFTER it has been signed (because real estate agents have such a lock on the process.... I have an opinion about that, but its not relevant here). This is in spite of the big-ass warning just above where a purchaser signs that says "IF IN DOUBT GET LAWYERED UP FIRST". Often the contract will contain conditions subsequent (subsequent here being subsequent to formation of the contract) such as a purchaser arranging finance sufficient to complete, or the purchaser selling a house, or subject to a purchaser arranging experts to check it out. My reading of that linked article suggested the silly woman signed up unconditional contracts on property worth $5M. She is fucked and burned. That contract says "I will pay you this much money on this date in exchange for your property". If she doesnt honour the contract, then the vendor has legal remedies, including obtaining a court order for specific performance (useless here) but also damages, including costs on the resale, and any loss sustained by the vendor including their legal fees.

The only malpractice here would be if the vendor's lawyers DIDNT sue her for loss.

Also that little nugget about GST is wrong on two counts: signing a contract "or nominee" in a transaction subject to GST signals to IRD that there are two transactions, (i.e. A sells to B or nominee, so IRD views it as A sell to B sell to nominee: this can have major effects particularly in respect of time of supply and if one party is not registered). the other is that the sale of residential property is an exempt supply not subject to GST.......

I feel sorry for this woman, I really do, but $200 spent early in the piece would have saved her a lot of heartache. But if in doubt kids, DONT FUCKING SIGN ANYTHING!!!!

rant over: if I see this jerk I will let you know.

[ManDownUnder]

...selfless and shameless BUMPORAMA...

Anyone seen Max?