Moon landing - Fact or fake?

**Skyryder** · 27th September 2007, 14:31

Originally Posted by GaZBur

OK Steam - sorry I gotta ask why you quoted that article - curiosity and all that got the better of me as its hard to tell.
Do you actually believe the article is real and intended to be read as fact or are you just winding people up?

Yep I saw the article and it's factual. Steam left out the bit that the moon shot went off course due to a navigation fault in automatic pilot and headed for Mars. Poor buggers are still there waiting for NASA to go and get them. Problem is Kennedy got shot. NASA made no contingency plans for that.

Skyryder

**idb** · 27th September 2007, 15:05

Originally Posted by GaZBur

OK Steam - sorry I gotta ask why you quoted that article - curiosity and all that got the better of me as its hard to tell.
Do you actually believe the article is real and intended to be read as fact or are you just winding people up?

be careful what you ask...they might be watching!!!

**scrivy** · 27th September 2007, 16:51

Originally Posted by scumdog

Do you REALLY think that after all those interviews, talks, questions after the moon landing that Buzz would STILL blush and walk away from a 'simple' question???

Actually, Buzz and co. weren't permitted to talk to people about it!! So I don't know about 'all those interviews' etc.

**Steam** · 27th September 2007, 17:16

Originally Posted by GaZBur

OK Steam - sorry I gotta ask why you quoted that article - curiosity and all that got the better of me as its hard to tell.
Do you actually believe the article is real and intended to be read as fact or are you just winding people up?

giggle...

giggle
heehee..

hahehahehehe

ha hahHA ha eheHAHAH

BWaaaahHA HA hah ha aha!

oooooAHahahAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHA

Ma HA HA HA HA HA!

Oh lord, I just gotta laugh. It's either that or smash my head repeatedly against the wall. Over to you, professor.

**Wolf** · 27th September 2007, 17:19

Whew! Steady on, Steam, you'll bust a gut.

**GaZBur** · 27th September 2007, 17:33

Originally Posted by Steam

giggle...

giggle
heehee..

...
Ma HA HA HA HA HA!

Oh lord, I just gotta laugh. It's either that or smash my head repeatedly against the wall. Over to you, professor.

Good on yer mate!!! Let me in on it next time and I will say something real controversial and perhaps we could start a real flame war! Hope your admission does not slow down the tread. So can anyone think of a topic controversial enough - but silly and funny too for another thread as this one probably doesn't have a lot more life in it!

**NighthawkNZ:Me** · 27th September 2007, 17:34

The and astronaughts on the moon the "Superman II". It was in colour and it is amercian so it must be true...

**pzkpfw** · 27th September 2007, 17:36

About the mirrors:

Originally Posted by Usarka

But you cannot say 100% that these were placed there by the manned apollo missions.

This seems to suggest the mirrors were placed some other way (remotely).

1. Who designed the equipment that placed the mirrors?
2. Who built the equipment that placed the mirrors?
3. Who controlled the equipment that placed the mirrors?
4. How did no one watching the Apollo missions notice?
etc.

Now, as well as saying Apollo was faked, you've added a secret mission to place mirrors on the moon.

Conspiracy theories generally have to grow and grow to keep up with all the claims being made; until they become far less likely than the real event.

Cheers,

**pzkpfw** · 27th September 2007, 17:41

Originally Posted by scrivy

During the Gemini/Mercury/Appollo testing missions, they had tens of thousands of issues/problems that each could have terminated a mission to the moon. How then could they have no problems when doing all the functions together required for a moon landing and return!! The probability of no major issues is enormous!!

1. Isn't that what testing is for? To find the issues? By your logic, the issues found when testing B747's prove that no Jumbo jets today could be flying.

2. What makes you say they had no issues when doing the moon landings?

3. How did you calculate the probabilities? How do you define "major"?

Cheers,

**imdying** · 27th September 2007, 17:58

Originally Posted by pzkpfw

1. Isn't that what testing is for? To find the issues? By your logic, the issues found when testing B747's prove that no Jumbo jets today could be flying.

2. What makes you say they had no issues when doing the moon landings?

3. How did you calculate the probabilities? How do you define "major"?

Cheers,

Woah woah woah there! No fighting the delusional nutters with logic, that's just not on!

**Steam** · 27th September 2007, 18:05

Originally Posted by imdying

Woah woah woah there! No fighting the delusional nutters with logic, that's just not on!

Meh, the nutters don't care about logic, it's such a limited way of thinking, so western, just closes your eyes to possibility. You just have to feel with your heart that something is right, let your spirit guide you to the truth. Less logic, more soul, that's what we all need.

**Wolf** · 27th September 2007, 18:17

Originally Posted by Steam

Meh, the nutters don't care about logic, it's such a limited way of thinking, so western, just closes your eyes to possibility. You just have to feel with your heart that something is right, let your spirit guide you to the truth. Less logic, more soul, that's what we all need.

You're sooooo right, lets just light some incense (or something more "electric" and psychedelic, if you prefer) put on our amethyst teleportation wunderbras, have some ancient sacred Celtic pumpkin soup, tune into the vibes and the Troof will be revealed despite the evil logic of the two-thousand-year worldwide conspirators...

**peasea** · 27th September 2007, 18:40

Originally Posted by pzkpfw

About the mirrors:

1. Who designed the equipment that placed the mirrors?
2. Who built the equipment that placed the mirrors?
3. Who controlled the equipment that placed the mirrors?

Wallace and Grommit.
Jeez......