While that is admirable it is completely out of step with the world at large.
There are a lot of violent people out there and if they meet with a violent end of their own choosing it may sadden you, but don't waste too many tears for them.
There are others more worthy of your concern, for instance right now hundreds of Bhudist monks in Burma...
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/topic/stor...ectid=10466842
12:35PM Sunday September 30, 2007
Two police officers were forced to take evasive action when they were confronted by a man swinging an axe in Napier early today.
One officer managed to get out of the way, so the man turned his attention to the other officer, who got behind a parked car, Senior Sergeant Andy Sloane said.
The man's associates then managed get the axe off him before he ran into a nearby property.
When he approached the two officers again shortly afterwards, he was pepper sprayed and handcuffed.
The man is due to appear in court tomorrow facing two charges of assault with a weapon.
Mr Sloane said the incident happened after police were called to McGrath St about 3.45am by residents concerned about a group of people milling around vehicles in the street.
When the two officers were talking to the group and taking down details, the man ran at them from "out of nowhere" with the axe.
He praised the officers for the way they handled the situation and said the pair had come through the incident "as good as gold".
Ok answer me this.
This man with an axe was over come and disabled whilst a man with a hammer was shot and killed.
Are the levels of training that different over the country?
I know this is a simplistic view but what is the difference between and axe and a hammer in the danger they pose?
Merde
"When you think of it,
Lifes a bowl of ....MERDE"
Different circumstances.
Timing?
i.e. the first officer was face to face with the ofender who may/may not have attacked a bystander but potentially posed a threat to them.
Second guy seemed to be only after the police - who had time/circumstances to distance themselves from him AND he was disarmed by 'associates'
Had the officers been armed Darwins law may have struck again.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Disarmed, not overcome and disabled, and by his associates, not by the cops.
Differences:
1. As far as I'm aware, NZ cops don't typically go forth armed unless they're called to an "offender with weapon" type of situation, so responding to the surprise axe attack with Glocks wasn't an option.
2. 'Associates' were present and able to disarm the offender while he was focused on the cops. Presumably at much lesser danger to themselves, since the guy wouldn't have been interested in attacking them.
Imagine if no 'associates' had been there, and either:
(a) one of the cops had been axed; or
(b) the cops had escaped successfully, given their unarmed state and consequent inability to neutralise the offender, and he had gone on to murder a bystander.
What would the unwashed masses be calling for then?
Same ballpark, I'd say, but that's not really the issue here.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
hopefully he resisted arrest and was vigorously restrained.
Fucked if I would put up with that sort of shit for what, $50k a year?
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Friggin Pigs!
The punishment for bad driving is death by cop, the punishment for vandalism is death by cop............looks like the fukkin cops have been paying too much attention to yanks and their murderous cops!
Cops investigated by cops? what bullshit! They are there to serve the people of NZ not themselves and without a completely independent police complaints authority; there will nevcer be any answerability for crimes committed by cops.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks