View Poll Results: Would you show an L plate?

Voters
176. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes - I wouldnt go over 70 either

    16 9.09%
  • No - but I still wouldnt go over 70

    2 1.14%
  • No and I wont bother with 70kmh limit

    87 49.43%
  • Yes and I would go over 70kmh

    62 35.23%
  • You are a rambling idiot

    9 5.11%
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 67

Thread: L plate - should I? Do you?

  1. #46
    Join Date
    2nd July 2007 - 01:24
    Bike
    05 Aprilia tuono
    Location
    the naki
    Posts
    240
    im on my L and i just ride, road, how do u spell that anyway. went from the grate NAKI to christchurch and there is no way in hell im going to do 70kph who the hell thourt up that, some person who drives a desk! and if i had a l plate on and i cop came up behind me he woud do me over so i just stay on 100kph and is all good. just ride safe and the copes dont bother you.
    ps if you do 110kph and get f**ked/pulled over you can lose your licence for being 40kph over the speed limet.
    Live long and prosper

  2. #47
    Join Date
    18th February 2007 - 20:04
    Bike
    1989 Honda CBR250R
    Location
    North Shore
    Posts
    475
    Wise point about not jumping straight into the 100km/h zones... Definitely the motorway was a place I avoided for the first few weeks

  3. #48
    Join Date
    18th February 2007 - 20:04
    Bike
    1989 Honda CBR250R
    Location
    North Shore
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by blue eyed savage View Post
    ps if you do 110kph and get f**ked/pulled over you can lose your licence for being 40kph over the speed limet.
    doesn't that apply to posted limits? It would just be a case of breach of license terms - 400 bux and 25 demerits or something like that

  4. #49
    Join Date
    13th February 2007 - 13:34
    Bike
    K8 GSXR 1000
    Location
    Hatfields Beach
    Posts
    74
    I did'nt put an L plate on when I got my learners, and lasted about 2 months before I got my first warning, then 2 weeks later, got pulled over by the same cop and got a $400 fine. (Fair enough) seeing as I got a warning. But I put an L-plate on straight away after that, and got seen multiple times on the motorway by cops who didn't pull me over once for going 110kmp/h.

    So, I would'nt want to risk the $400 fine.

    Unless you are rich lol

  5. #50
    Join Date
    16th August 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    Left Jandal
    Location
    Too Close
    Posts
    874
    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    On a 750 you dont have the option.
    Your a rambling idiot ha.
    Oh no, the people have spoken. It's official. Do I get a badge?

    for the record tho, never had the L plate on till my restricted test.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    4th October 2007 - 19:37
    Bike
    2006 suzuki bandit
    Location
    whakatane
    Posts
    14
    What i did was break the corner of my L plate and blue tack it on the back...that way i could use the god old "it must of broke off" routine and have a lil evidence for the copper.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    19th July 2007 - 11:35
    Bike
    Suzuki GN250 - 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    61
    I got pulled over on Thursday night at 11:30pm in New Lynn.

    I had purchased L plates but not picked them up. It was after 11 anyway.

    The cop was a really nice guy. He warned me it would have been $800 if he had decided to write out the ticket, but if I promised to get the plates and not let him catch me again, then I could go straight home. I have one on now (although there wasn't much room to put it that was visible :S ).

    Now, I say you should wear it, because I really can't afford to lose $400 or $800 right now, and I don't think you would like to either.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    2nd March 2007 - 10:38
    Bike
    that one in my sig
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Deviant View Post
    The cop was a really nice guy. He warned me it would have been $800 if he had decided to write out the ticket
    I take it the $800 was $400 for no L plate and $400 for out of hours?

    I'm surprised you got away with the "out of licence hours" ticket. Who says coppers are all about quota. Here you were in breach of two licence conditions and he let you off. Nice

  9. #54
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Well as I see it... not wearing the L plate is just another thing you can get slammed for if you manage to aggravate the fuzz.

    There are five specific conditions on our learners license:

    1. Wear an L plate at all times (can't remember what it says about placement).
    2. Do not exceed 70 km/h at any time.
    3. Do not drive between 10 pm and 5 am. (Applies to restricted as well)
    4. Do not ride a motorcycle larger than 250 cc. (Applies to restricted as well)
    5. Do not carry a passenger. (Applies to restricted as well)

    If you get done breaking one of these conditions it can set you back NZ$400 and 25 demerit points. If you get caught breaking two that's NZ$800 and 50 demerit points. In other words - try to minimise the damage, your ass belongs to the cops anyway!

    Getting caught doing 110 km/h not wearing a L plate you could get fined $800 and 50 demerit points for breaching license conditions and then you can add whatever the penalty for doing 10 km/h above the speed limit is (the speed limit is 100 km/h - not 70. That you're not allowed to exceed 70 is a specific restriction and carries it's own penalty).

    My personal opinion is that restrictions 4 and 5 makes good sense. If you're a new driver (i.e. doesn't hold a full license already) I think that the other restrictions makes some sense - but if you've held a full car license for 5 years you will have some grasp of how traffic moves, what to look out for, etc. and the learners period doesn't make any sense whatsoever. But it's not that easy to put down rules though - however sitting at 70 km/h on the open road is downright stupid, and the police realise as much.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    19th July 2007 - 11:35
    Bike
    Suzuki GN250 - 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    61
    I fully agree with both previous posts. HTe rules are there for a reason, not revenue collection (in this case!).

    And yes, he was really nice about it. $800 would have seriously f***ed me, I'm in the middle of one of those times where even a small fine would be a major issue. Even if I wasn't, $800 is a big sum of cash.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    25th June 2007 - 21:21
    Bike
    S1000RR
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    6,988
    Some newbies says "Having an L plate makes you look noob, Also get abused by some cage drivers"
    But thats not true, I bet a single bus driver gets more abuse than every L plated Motorcyclist combined.


    If you can make it on Kiwibiker you can make it anywhere.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    19th July 2007 - 17:37
    Bike
    I own a Bl'orange StripleR
    Location
    Isle of Man
    Posts
    51
    I don't understand the "stigma" of displaying an L plate. I have been in situations where I have stalled in front of cars (at lights) and collected my thoughts, and gone on my way again.
    It makes other people aware that you will make mistakes, as I have and will continue to do so, and if they are normal they will not go totally mental if you stall infront of anyone, like I did last week in front of a big SUV, the bloke went nuts, shaking his fist and all that! Then I remembered " ahhh....I've got a big yellow L plate on the back " put the bike in gear and went on my way.
    No problems.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    16th November 2006 - 14:20
    Bike
    04 GSX 250
    Location
    Kumeu,Auckland
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel View Post
    Well as I see it... not wearing the L plate is just another thing you can get slammed for if you manage to aggravate the fuzz.

    There are five specific conditions on our learners license:

    1. Wear an L plate at all times (can't remember what it says about placement).
    2. Do not exceed 70 km/h at any time.
    3. Do not drive between 10 pm and 5 am. (Applies to restricted as well)
    4. Do not ride a motorcycle larger than 250 cc. (Applies to restricted as well)
    5. Do not carry a passenger. (Applies to restricted as well)

    If you get done breaking one of these conditions it can set you back NZ$400 and 25 demerit points. If you get caught breaking two that's NZ$800 and 50 demerit points. In other words - try to minimise the damage, your ass belongs to the cops anyway!

    Getting caught doing 110 km/h not wearing a L plate you could get fined $800 and 50 demerit points for breaching license conditions and then you can add whatever the penalty for doing 10 km/h above the speed limit is (the speed limit is 100 km/h - not 70. That you're not allowed to exceed 70 is a specific restriction and carries it's own penalty).

    My personal opinion is that restrictions 4 and 5 makes good sense. If you're a new driver (i.e. doesn't hold a full license already) I think that the other restrictions makes some sense - but if you've held a full car license for 5 years you will have some grasp of how traffic moves, what to look out for, etc. and the learners period doesn't make any sense whatsoever. But it's not that easy to put down rules though - however sitting at 70 km/h on the open road is downright stupid, and the police realise as much.

    Why does everyone misinterpret the restrictions on the learner license. The 70km/hr rule ONLY applies to OPEN ROADS and a motorway, highway or any other road is not an open road. These are marked with a white road signs with a black cross.

    Pasted from LTSA website>>>

    You must not go faster than 70 km/h on the open road.


  14. #59
    Join Date
    15th March 2007 - 20:38
    Bike
    BMW R1200s
    Location
    Te Atatu Peninsula
    Posts
    517
    Can't say I've noticed any change in driver behavior after removing my L plate.
    I actually left it on for two weeks after I did my test as my mate was borrowing the bike to sit his restricted.
    While I was on my L I rode after 10pm a couple of time and never stuck to 70kph on the open RD

    The hours rule is a waste of time for anyone with a full car licence. I've been driving for 15 years and it's just as dark at 7pm as it is at midnight. I'd argue it's probably safer to be riding late at night due to lower traffic volumes (drunken / stoned driver factor not withstanding).
    For younger drivers just starting out I agree with it but I think anyone with 2 years or more experience behind the wheel should be able ride or drive regardless of what time it is.

    The 70kph rule is dangerous. At that speed you are a traffic hazard.
    I tried it the first two times I took the bike out and just about got steamrollered.
    From then on I have riden at the speed the traffic is going, be that 100 or faster or slower.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    18th February 2007 - 20:04
    Bike
    1989 Honda CBR250R
    Location
    North Shore
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowcarver04 View Post
    Why does everyone misinterpret the restrictions on the learner license. The 70km/hr rule ONLY applies to OPEN ROADS and a motorway, highway or any other road is not an open road. These are marked with a white road signs with a black cross.

    Pasted from LTSA website>>>

    You must not go faster than 70 km/h on the open road.

    This has been debated time and time again, if you dig deeper into the site other than that one phrase leaving it up to interpretation you'll find somewhere that you're wrong about that. Here's for logic, one reason to limit a learner to 70kph could be to slow them down on the motorway (fuck knows why), but they can travel 80kph in an 80kph zone if they like. Or, the other possible reason is to slow them down to 70kph on all public roads (my interpretation of open road) because they are learning how to ride a bike for the first time so they shouldn't go too fast.

    Yes we all know 70kph is slow, but if we're here posting about it we're obviously not so inexperienced to need that sort of restraint.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •