Ohlins YA052 rear-set for an FJR1300

[Hitcher]

Can I ask what was the cost?

Of course you can.

[AllanB]

funny thing is that the FJ's come standard with 'ohlins' on the rear - unfortunately I suspect its just a sticker borrowed from the company as by all accounts they are a sad version. Guess that's the benefit of owning the superior company.......

Still don't see why they should cost so bloody much..............

[James Deuce]

Still don't see why they should cost so bloody much..............

You need to try one to understand. It's like going out to buy milk and coming back to find that your wife has been replaced by an 18 year Catherine Zeta Jones.

[Squiggles]

i hope you know that its people like you posting threads like this that will most likely drag this student into debt!

[Hitcher]

You need to try one to understand. It's like going out to buy milk and coming back to find that your wife has been replaced by an 18 year Catherine Zeta Jones.

Except there's no rebound...

[AllanB]

Ah now I understand

[HDTboy]

Still don't see why they should cost so bloody much..............

Have you priced up a stock shock to compare?



If you really want to see how bad your bike was Hitcher, throw the stock suspension back into it for a day's riding in about a months time.

[HenryDorsetCase]

It’s bad form to start with a question, particularly a rhetorical one. But why on earth didn’t I upgrade my rear suspension earlier?

Learning about motorcycles is a slow process based on distilling the various stuff one reads, hears from others and learns through first-hand experience. One thing I’m continuing to learn is that the bike that rolls off the end of a manufacturer’s production line is an imperfect compromise that leaves much to be desired.

Another thing I’m learning is that suspension and handling is what makes a bike great.

So what has triggered this latest “Aha!” moment? Replacing a shagged Yamaha standard rear suspension set with a unit made lovingly in Stockholm by a bunch of Swedes called Ohlins, that’s what.

About 10,000km ago I noted that my rear rebound damping was becoming more than a little suboptimal, and that poking at it with a stick didn’t seem to help. The effect was particularly noticeable when exiting a poorly surfaced corner (as can be found on most New Zealand roads) and winding on the power. Jjjjjjitters. Not nice.

Eventually I got around to entering into email dialogue with Robert Taylor – the suspension guru – and presently a parcel was on its way from Stockholm. On Saturday this was fitted for me by Kerry Dukie, Robert’s agent in these parts. And over the Rimutakas and jauntily around the Wairarapa did the newly-enhanced FJR and my fair self astride it go.

The difference was immediately noticeable. I realised how much the old rear set used to “talk” to me, embellishing road “noise” and other information via the bike’s handling characteristics. The new Ohlins makes the back of the bike feel like it’s stuck to the road like icecream to a blanket, as my mother would say. The ride is firm, but not harsh. Gone are the corner exiting jjjjjjitters and those previously experienced under hard braking – I’m talking emergency-stop braking. General unevenness in the road surface is also well dealt to.

The Rimutakas is a great test bed for all of a bike’s components. I hadn’t realised how much I was unsettled by the imperfections on this stretch of road and actually anticipated their effects on the bike by compromising on my preferred line through corners, braking points, acceleration points and so on. Now I feel more in control and able to enjoy the ride experience all the more.

My next “Aha!” moment was realising that my front suspension could probably be improved immeasurably by some quality aftermarket components. Ka-ching!

what he said ^^^^

[HenryDorsetCase]

funny thing is that the FJ's come standard with 'ohlins' on the rear - unfortunately I suspect its just a sticker borrowed from the company as by all accounts they are a sad version. Guess that's the benefit of owning the superior company.......

Still don't see why they should cost so bloody much..............

have a look in the suspension thread, Robert Taylor has been thru this at length.

In fact, have a look at the suspension thread (in the suspension subforum) where knowledgeable people discuss stuff.... really enlightening... bit like reading Kevin Cameron....

[Fatjim]

Don't forget than any shock needs rebuilding because of wear and tear, whether its made in Japan by "Yamaha" or made in Japan by "Ohlins".

[Robert Taylor]

funny thing is that the FJ's come standard with 'ohlins' on the rear - unfortunately I suspect its just a sticker borrowed from the company as by all accounts they are a sad version. Guess that's the benefit of owning the superior company.......

Still don't see why they should cost so bloody much..............

You know, peoples perception is a funny thing. In reality there should be higher prices so I could actually have some margin.

If ( for example ) we are looking at the price from a perspective of ''redshed mentality'' then yes the price may appear to be high. But there is a plethora of ''redshed'' type shocks out there. Cheap replacements that very often have worse abrupt edge bump absorption qualities than oem. Cheap materials, very average tolerancing, high friction, a very small pool of ''one size fits most'' valving specs ( if you can call it valving ) and very often single acting. By that I mean damping control in rebound only. Ride height control only partly managed by heavily preloaded springs, often very aggressive acting progressive springs. Very poor ''g out'' resistance. Its easy to churn out thousands upon thousnds of these cheap to produce shocks, embellish it with some slick ( but very economical with the truth ) marketing and ''Bobs your uncle''.

People can be gullibly receptive to mass marketing, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and a few other modern day dictators here and abroad are testament to that.

Conversely look at a well engineered and very well developed / tested shock;

Top quality materials

Very precise tolerancing, low friction

Stability of performance due to sophisticated design and careful matching of the relative expansion rates of differing materials

Any external adjusters are not there for decoration only

Lots of emphasis on compression damping control, meaning lighter spring rate with less preload can often be employed, delivering greater compliance. Lighter springs require much less aggressive high speed rebound damping. That in turn gives better mechanical grip because the tyre ''finds the road'' more readily and the shock will also run cooler through being less restrictive in damping flow.

Specifically developed for each individual model, no subscription to the shonky one size fits all mentality. Dyno tested, track and road tested. Refined as required, often very time consuming.

A company top heavy with engineers that are always developing ongoing technological improvements. Ohlins for example has about 130 employees at its main building near Stockholm and over 60 are engineers. Normally most companies are top heavy with accountants....... Also R & D facilities in another Swedish location, in Germany and the US.

Full and proper backup, factory, distributor, dealer, end user.

Ready parts availability

I could go on but those are main salient points. From my own perspective if I was just a distributor onselling and providing minimal low knowledge backup it would be a disservice to the product.

I think also that here in the land of institutionalised ( and deliberate ) state dependency our sealocked geographically isolated location gives us a different perspective to say Europeans. That we are overtaxed and underpaid with rather less disposable income exacerbates our attitudes re pricing.

[RantyDave]

we are overtaxed and underpaid

Actually, I believe if you look at the figures our taxation isn't that bad. We just get paid for shit.

Dave

[Robert Taylor]

Actually, I believe if you look at the figures our taxation isn't that bad. We just get paid for shit.

Dave

Less tax and less insidious levies and taxes on taxes would not disincentivise people so much and the total tax take could as a result increase because people would have more incentive to work for a better return. Equals more expendable income equals more money go round equals a stronger economy.

[James Deuce]

Give us our $200,000 back. We'll reinvest it in the economy, one way or another.

I, for one, would buy a nice set of Ohlins RWU forks for the Zed and spend a fortnight in New Plymouth while Mr Taylor installed them. Local and National economies improved, right there.

[James Deuce]

Actually, I believe if you look at the figures our taxation isn't that bad. We just get paid for shit.

Dave

I get taxed the same as if I lived in Norway. Total take including Rates (which are just a hidden tax to fund Local Government which in turn does NOTHING except service debt with my money) adds up to 53-54% if you include levies on Insurance, GST, School Fees, Health Insurance (needed in my House), Rubbish collection, Lanfill fees, and Petrol taxes and levies. Norway doesn't bother with dividing to conquer with the tax take and just says, "53% Income Tax please". For that you get cradle to grave health care (including dental), somewhere to live if necessary, and a tertiary education system that only asks for its money back if you move to another country. They end up with about twice the disposable income we have and a position at the top of the OECD living standards table (thank you North Sea Oil and reinvestment in Infrastructure) despite living on the side of vertiginous cliffs and weather that makes 15C a balmy Summer day.

I get nothing back for my "investment" in NZ unless I am prepared to be a complete bastard and actually demand that some of the Government services I'm forced to use perform to specification.

As Finn points out though, it's my own fault for not being rich enough to avoid tax altogether.