Yes base load is exactly that, a quantity of energy that is always going to be consumed no matter what the situation. Since NZ has such a small industry base the power demand is very peaky, thus there is little or no room for genuine base load stations (eg nuclear). There is current some semi-base load generators but they get turned off from time to time. For instance the coal Huntly and gas Otahuhu and Stratford. They can't just go down to 10MW at the min period of demand (around 5am) and then up to max load (250 to 400MW) by 8am. They have a min load of around 100-200MW where they cannot go lower unless turned off. Once they're off they can take anywhere from 12 to 48 hours to be up to full load again.
There is a small amount of NZ hydro that is also base generation, eg the clutha scheme (Clyde and Roxburgh) because they have no capacity to store water over longer than approx 24 hours. The big schemes (Taupo and Waitaki) are able to store water for years if they choose, but its normally for 6-9 months.
You cannot store wind energy. Whereas all other forms of generation has to be forecasted and bidded into the market, wind can come and go as it pleases. Thus as soon as a wind farm gets a puff it can go from say 1MW to 100MW in 5 minutes. So in usual scenarios a nearby station (can be gas, hydro etc) will get backed off. So this is essentially storing the potential energy generation (gas or water) and all works fine and dandy so long as the gas pipeline of the thermal station or the head lake of the hydro station isn't already at its capacity. If it is then you are no better off from where you started. This is probable scenario of many of the proposed wind farms atm.
I think that the solar idea has its merits. Along with better power conservation techniques (we waste a boat load of power in poorly insulated homes etc) and we will be better off. That alone won't fix the problem though. Some major investment is required to do that.
Bookmarks