And you'll vote for one of them again?
Because you can't find an option that promotes less government?
Look again.
Yes.
Would be really cool if we had the insight and constitudinal fortitude to decline to buy the "product" en mass though. "No thanks, we don't want professional sport at that price, we'll stick to amateur provincial stuff. Good luck with the cup thing though, I'm sure you'll manage just fine without us."
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
*makes mental note* "Must not have advertising on the aircraft when it is used to flower bomb the stupid pointy-ball-game".
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Ok so who really gives a toss about the RUGBY anyhow ????
What a waste of time, resource's and money.
Moan by never going to it a release these guysto do a real days work out and about where they should be. Not babysitting a bunch of half pissed rugby fanatics.
Ok illnow.
One wonders what Westpac Stadium and AMI Stadium will be called for the duration of the World Cup. And who's going to tell the publicans in a 5km radius of the Cup venues that they can only serve Heineken?
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
After the next election, there will either be a Labour coalition or a National coalition, or Labour will have screwed things up so badly that National can govern alone. Who the specific coalition parties are obviously involves much discussion about rolling over and playing dead again, and baubles, or whatever, but NZF, Greens, Maori, Act, Alliance, Progressives are the likely candidates. The Libz, ALCP, DDP, Republicans and assorted other fringe parties aren't likely.
So, either you candidate vote for someone you think will win, (or against someone you want to lose), and party vote for a minor party to ensure what little balance can be achieved, or you waste your vote to a greater or lesser degree.
Anyone who believes otherwise is deluded.
Last edited by rainman; 17th February 2008 at 22:25. Reason: s/our/your/... doh!
Redefining slow since 2006...
Yep with T shirt with monster boobs. Actually you will probly find that such a slogan would not be in breach of the act as it expresses and opion and not a product.
No what you need is a bottle shaped Heinken Dildo with a T shirt. SUCK ON THIS. Plenty of Photoshop types on here run a competition and use the best one................Good luck
skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
This has nothing to do with property rights. The issue is the so called 'clean zone.' Does the Government or local body councils have the right to declare an area of the public domain an exclusive 'promotional zone' for the use of 'official sponsors?' That is what the clean zone is an area of the public domain that includes visibility (air space) both of private and public land for the purpose of advertising or promotional activities. It's an interesting question that suggests that business that are in the clean zone may have to remove their signage or be in breach of the law. Somehow I think any business with a permanent address within the zone would be excluded.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
People start boycotting sports events or stop buying official sponsor products at said events. If everyone just took their own non-lablled food and drink and stoppped buying Mc D (evil fookers anyway) or whoevers stuff then it would soon hit thier pockets.
Hit them where it hurts!!
We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
Running over the same old ground.
What have you found? The same old fears.
Wish you were here. QWQ
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks