Sorry to sound like a shitty prick but I predicted this.
The real difference between a well set up pro twins bike and a F3 bike cost/performance wise is?
Being totally honest with ourselves here the difference is about 5 hp and as some have said 10k
They are too much alike plain n simple --FFS they dont look or even SOUND different from a F3 bike
Break it down and the costs of running/building a pro twin is the same as a midfeild/top endish F3 --so whats the point?
I figure EITHER A) go for the doctor and let pro twins be full open slather 650 twins or air cooled 750 twins. -theres enough bikes which are close now to being up there -
but then restrict f3 to 400cc multi's and 500cc liquid cooled and 600cc air cooled twins. -let that class go back to the cheaper class it used to be
Or B) tighten up the regulations HEAPS
1) factory looking bodywork (glass replicas are fine)--so the bike looks like what it is
2) NO engine mods at all including PC's
3) restrict front fork mods to a max $ value so its basicly springs/oil/emulators
4)Rear shocks factory
5) muffler replacement ONLY allowed -so its not performance enhancing just louder and cheaper in a crash
6)bike weight must be within 5% of factory spec.
7)Replacement consumables-levers/bars/gearshifts allowed provided they perform the IDENTICAL function to the factory part
This precludes rearsets and lower bars but does allow for cheaper (crash cheaper) alternatives.
8) gearing to be factory gearing available for that bike.
This is a possible area FOR CONFUSION- sv650 nakeds have different gearing to the faired model but still cuts changes down to 2 possible rear sprockets.
9) crash protective equipment allowed -again to reduce cost
Reeling out my old barrow--theres an easier way--75HP cap --random test of top 5 finishers.-over 75---bye bye series points.
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
Bookmarks