Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 63

Thread: Sue Bradford

  1. #16
    Join Date
    28th August 2005 - 18:21
    Bike
    None, sold.
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,270
    Quote Originally Posted by klingon View Post
    What's the matter with a politician writing a bill that removes the right to use "discipline" as a defence in child abuse cases?
    I have no problem with that, but she has been going on about how the welfare system is hard on people. Like, come on? She should sit on welfare in the UK for a while.

    Dave
    Signature needed. Apply within.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 21:29
    Bike
    GL1800
    Location
    Matiere, King Country
    Posts
    1,847
    She's a LOSER; Possibly feeling Guilty about the suicide of her own offspring - but NO reason to take it out on normal folk NZ; Bradford was a 'Dumby' (pun intended) for this bill, as Herr Helen has no kids and I'd suggest, is not in a relationship that would not provide any...
    "If you haven't grown up by the time you turn 50, you don't have to!"

  3. #18
    Join Date
    7th December 2007 - 12:09
    Bike
    Valkyrie 1500 ,HD softail, BMW r1150r
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    2,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyryder View Post

    Most of New Zealand has moved on from this.

    Skyryder
    How can we move on from something that has now been made Law, and therefor will remain with us and our children from here on?
    Or should I say states's offspring?

    Parents are made less and less responsible for childrens upbringing,
    Teachers are powerless to discipline, the police are scrutinised and vilified for policing, turned into a revenue gathering collecting agency.
    Ad the " underclass" is rapidly expanding thanks to
    the state sponsored breeding program's, and various other aids.
    The ever increasing number of benificiaries/state dependents is being paid by an ever diminishing group of working taxpayers.

    And it is destroying our social fabric, we don' need just police.... we need to remove the sort of people that have created this insane madness.

    Sue definitely belongs to that sorry lot.....
    Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....

  4. #19
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 13:36
    Bike
    '69 Lambretta & SR400
    Location
    By the other harbour.
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyryder View Post
    Pinched this off another KB thread.

    So according to your defination this is reasonable force.

    http://video.stumbleupon.com/#p=ssnurt6tso

    If that didn't leave a bruise, I'll vote Green in the next election.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Lobster View Post
    Only a homo puts an engine back together WITHOUT making it go faster.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    A law that is designed to target a very small minority of society, but manages to make criminals out of the majority?

    Good law-making - NOT!

    The police are left with trying to make sense of this shit law. Poor sods.
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  6. #21
    Join Date
    16th February 2005 - 14:35
    Bike
    Sold it, what a dumb c@^t
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by smokeyging View Post
    The very few spoil it for the many.
    a friend of mine worked at ‘starship’ for years, just one of many cases was a boy was brought in one night, all he kept saying was ‘don’t hit me‘, my friend said that ‘you are in a hospital, we will not hurt you’, the injuries were so severe that the child did’nt survive. cases like this got too much for my friend , in the finish she eventually left . what do you do to get around a problem like this?

    repel section 59, that'll fix it.
    "Those who beat their swords into plows will plow for those who dont"

  7. #22
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by smokeyging View Post
    what do you do to get around a problem like this?
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  8. #23
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Quote Originally Posted by klingon View Post
    Crikey, you lot are a bit shallow aren't you? Of course, safety in numbers
    What's the matter with a politician writing a bill that removes the right to use "discipline" as a defence in child abuse cases? It actually removed the clause allowing 'reasonable force' without defining or introducing a viable alternative

    And then you use insults about her femininity to somehow justify your argument?! You'd better find something that supports your case better than that! Women should stay in the kitchen/laundry/bedroom. Is/was there no-one brave enough to fit the right length of chain to MizBradford?

    Personally I think the bill was a good idea. That probably makes me a minority of one on this site. Doesn't bother me in the slightest. Not all 'good' ideas should see the light of day. God knows I've had enough of them in this category.
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  9. #24
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by awayatc View Post
    How can we move on from something that has now been made Law, and therefor will remain with us and our children from here on?
    Or should I say states's offspring?

    Parents are made less and less responsible for childrens upbringing,
    Teachers are powerless to discipline, the police are scrutinised and vilified for policing, turned into a revenue gathering collecting agency.
    Ad the " underclass" is rapidly expanding thanks to
    the state sponsored breeding program's, and various other aids.
    The ever increasing number of benificiaries/state dependents is being paid by an ever diminishing group of working taxpayers.

    And it is destroying our social fabric, we don' need just police.... we need to remove the sort of people that have created this insane madness.

    Sue definitely belongs to that sorry lot.....
    Absolutely 100% correct. Now Im going to say something that is 100% chauvinistic and very politically incorrect............and frankly I dont give a damn about that.
    3 women:
    1) Bradford, probably shares the same hairdresser as Worzel Gummidge and has the dress sense of a sack of potatoes. Is a complete moron and frankly its an international embarrassment that our mickey mouse electoral system enables people like her to become MPs.
    2) Clark, probably related to the Frankenstein family and is the most corrupt and scheming priminister in our history. Probably headed to the UN where she can feel comfortable with her communist mates and continue to spread her poison.
    3) Jenny Shipley, well shes not exactly an oil painting either. But at least compared to the former two she had good manners and a sense of decorum. She also made reasonable attempt to dress / present herself with a degree of elegance. As a priminister way way ahead of Frankensteins relative.

    If at some satge in the future we have another woman priminister please let it be a conservative politician with the success story of Margaret Thatcher or even Golda Meier.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  10. #25
    Join Date
    3rd January 2007 - 22:23
    Bike
    A chubby lollipop
    Location
    I'm over here!
    Posts
    2,539
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Absolutely 100% correct. Now Im going to say something that is 100% chauvinistic and very politically incorrect............and frankly I dont give a damn about that.
    3 women:
    1) Bradford, probably shares the same hairdresser as Worzel Gummidge and has the dress sense of a sack of potatoes. Is a complete moron and frankly its an international embarrassment that our mickey mouse electoral system enables people like her to become MPs.
    2) Clark, probably related to the Frankenstein family and is the most corrupt and scheming priminister in our history. Probably headed to the UN where she can feel comfortable with her communist mates and continue to spread her poison.
    3) Jenny Shipley, well shes not exactly an oil painting either. But at least compared to the former two she had good manners and a sense of decorum. She also made reasonable attempt to dress / present herself with a degree of elegance. As a priminister way way ahead of Frankensteins relative.

    If at some satge in the future we have another woman priminister please let it be a conservative politician with the success story of Margaret Thatcher or even Golda Meier.

    Wonder Woman, now there's a gal!

  11. #26
    Join Date
    11th December 2004 - 20:46
    Bike
    2018 Ducati Monster 797
    Location
    In a boot
    Posts
    5,250
    Blog Entries
    38
    BUT... if a woman in politics WAS *gasp* attractive, do you think she would be taken seriously?
    Hell NO!!!
    She would just be eye-candy for the nation and the rumor/gossip mill would start in on how she's had plastic surgery or something, and nobody would be interested in her policies, only her boobies.
    I don't believe people in NZ would/could respect a female politician who wasn't butt ugly. Maybe that's the reason why women in politics (especially in narrow minded NZ) are unattractive and almost manly, because the attractive ones don't get taken seriously, they are too feminine and there are too many chauvinists about who still believe women don't have any place in having anything to do with running our country.
    Just remember, it's not a beauty contest!

    awaiting the abuse for being beautiful... hahaha

  12. #27
    Join Date
    19th July 2007 - 20:05
    Bike
    750 auw
    Location
    Mianus
    Posts
    2,247
    A hot prime minister could make any law she wanted.


    mind you, it seems that helen can too.....

  13. #28
    Join Date
    7th December 2007 - 12:09
    Bike
    Valkyrie 1500 ,HD softail, BMW r1150r
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    2,144
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs Kendog View Post
    I don't believe people in NZ would/could respect a female politician who wasn't butt ugly.


    Lots of people must have thought what you you are saying, but plenty people have a face like Sue breadbox,....
    except they have the decency to sit on theirs....

    Respect however has to be earned, ugly or pretty......
    Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....

  14. #29
    Join Date
    5th November 2006 - 12:51
    Bike
    Yamablah Arse-Ix
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Fitby
    Posts
    254
    Quote Originally Posted by klingon View Post
    Crikey, you lot are a bit shallow aren't you? What's the matter with a politician writing a bill that removes the right to use "discipline" as a defence in child abuse cases?

    And then you use insults about her femininity to somehow justify your argument?! You'd better find something that supports your case better than that!

    Personally I think the bill was a good idea. That probably makes me a minority of one on this site. Doesn't bother me in the slightest.
    I was just about to press the button with a huge rant against everything that Sue Bradford stands for...but then I thought: life's to short to get stressed about dipshits. For that is what she is, and stands for.

    So I deleted it all - cos she isn't worth it. Really.

    It doesn't matter whether you're a minority, or a majority.

    She is wrong. The country needs less of her. And that is that.

    The End.
    It's back..."Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  15. #30
    Join Date
    5th November 2006 - 12:51
    Bike
    Yamablah Arse-Ix
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Fitby
    Posts
    254
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Absolutely 100% correct. Now Im going to say something that is 100% chauvinistic and very politically incorrect............and frankly I dont give a damn about that.
    3 women:
    1) Bradford, probably shares the same hairdresser as Worzel Gummidge and has the dress sense of a sack of potatoes. Is a complete moron and frankly its an international embarrassment that our mickey mouse electoral system enables people like her to become MPs.
    2) Clark, probably related to the Frankenstein family and is the most corrupt and scheming priminister in our history. Probably headed to the UN where she can feel comfortable with her communist mates and continue to spread her poison.
    3) Jenny Shipley, well shes not exactly an oil painting either. But at least compared to the former two she had good manners and a sense of decorum. She also made reasonable attempt to dress / present herself with a degree of elegance. As a priminister way way ahead of Frankensteins relative.

    If at some satge in the future we have another woman priminister please let it be a conservative politician with the success story of Margaret Thatcher or even Golda Meier.
    Actually, my rant was going to be pretty much along these lines, plus what a complete waste of time, money and effort repealing s59 was. The only person to benefit from this will be...Sue Bradford and her CV (such as it is). Sure as hell won't stop the retard parents from beating their kids half to death. What part of that she can't understand is completely beyond me.

    BTW Jenny Shipley's daughter is quite hot too (worked with her for a while...)
    It's back..."Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •