Am I alone in this or do other people think M Cullen is sounding like a tired old broken record. "If we give you tax cuts it's just going to mean cutting down government services".
The fact is that in most countries that have offered tax cuts that reward people for working more and increasing productivity have actually seen more money coming in to the government, not less.
Is it so hard to see that a tax policy that stifles, and punishes people for working is actually going to bring less money in than a tax policy that rewards work. If you work more you get slammed with at least a double whammy, you lose "working for families" assistance and you get placed in a higher tax bracket. You may also lose other benefits because of your "high income".
How about a fair tax policy that does not punish people for producing wealth that can go into health care, roads and education.
I also want to see families taxed as a unit so that families where one of the partners decides to forgo payed work to care for children is not slammed into the highest tax bracket at an absurdly low income level if taking care of a whole family is taken into account. It's only fair, but will auntie Helen have a bar of it? No, apparently it does not buy her enough votes...
When pension time come a married couple gets less pension than individuals do. When people are working the fact that one of the partners may be the families sole support is conveniently ignored.
Bookmarks