Nup.
I've owned both, and the 800 is much better in most regards.
That's not true - most tests up until the last couple of years have rated the VFR well. The problem is that the VFR is now down on power and suspension compared to the bikes it's in the same class as. It needs and is a few years overdue for a (proper) upgrade.
Yes, the VTec is kinda dumb in some ways - doesn't add power, and is an unnecessary complication. It's main purpose (not that it's advertised as such) is to meet EuroIII emissions testing, for both noise and fumes.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
Eggs Zachary what I found, when going from a VFR750 to a VTR to the VFR800.
The big difference I found at first was that the VTR has a big torque wodge that starts at 3k rpm, whereas the VFR's peak torque is around 7-8krpm. It made the VFR feel like it had a huge hole in the power delivery down low. Peak HP is around the same though, and overall the VFR feels like a much more sophisticated bike, and does everything (apart from wheelies) better.
Still miss the VTR though.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Hmmmm... Just got off the phone to Bluewing Honda and they told me that Japan has stopped making the current model VFR and that the 08 is the last off the line... They also said nothing has been announced to replace it yet.
Anyone have any speculation bout if or what itl be replaced with?
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
www.Ridertraining.co.nz
NZTA Approved CBTA Instructor Assessor
- Restricted + Full Licence Training & Testing
- Onroad Coaching & Training
Auckland
Call or Txt 0210334766
info@ridertraining.co.nz
www.Ridertraining.co.nz
NZTA Approved CBTA Instructor Assessor
- Restricted + Full Licence Training & Testing
- Onroad Coaching & Training
Auckland
Call or Txt 0210334766
info@ridertraining.co.nz
Go for it mate. The Honda V4's have always been fantastic. The VFR800 is extremely competent and does everything you want in a bike. And it handles 100x better than your old GS too. It's lighter blah blah.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
That's funny 'cause just a few weeks ago BlueWing sent out to their dealers a list of their models for the coming year and the VFR was on it. BlueWing often make me wonder though...
As I understand it the capacity of the VFR can't be enlarged it's already bored out to the max, so a bigger V4 has to be a new design.
Then again we're still awaiting the long rumoured V5 - and the replacement for the Blackbird - and the V4 Superbike contender and...
In the last couple of years the new models (apart from the CBRs) seem to be all designed and built in Italy.
I'm not sure if the V Tech idea is entirely dead. Part of the logic for having it is fuel economy and that would seem to be an idea whose time has come. Suzuki is currently developing a different way of acheiving a similar result, variable profile cams or something equally umm different?
As for VFRs being down on power? Compared to what? Yes if a Blackbird, but they should still compare to similar sized bikes.
And don't believe anybody who says V Tech doesn't work, it does. You may not particularly like it, but it does do what it was designed to do. For the record I don't mind it, it's just there and that's that. I would've liked gear driven cams too, but you can't buy a new one of those either so these things ain't options.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
and they are a fekkin nice looking bike imho
F M S
My mate imported a 2008 anniversary Edition Vfr 800 from the USA to replace his 2000 Anniversary one. He absolutely loves it. Says its tighter and a lot better than his previous VFR800. He's offered me heaps of rides but I haven't taken him up on riding his new baby yet. His old 2000 VFR did everything our Vtr's and similar bikes did on our trips. I road that one a few times and it didn't feel as hoony as the VTR as said here. But over all it was a much better all round bike I would say. Never got left behind when we went for a blast and a shit load more relaxing when doing all those K's on a trip.
PS Botany did have one same red white and blue but without the Anniversary stickers the one I know has!! Dunno if its still there.
They are really not my cup of tea, but even if I don't like the styling they are a bloody good bike.
On a Motorcycle you're penetrating distance, right along with the machine!! In a car you're just a spectator, the windshields like a TV!!
'Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out! Shouting, ' Holy sh!t... What a Ride!! '
The reason they were dropped on the VTec was noise. VTec is supposed to make the bike quieter at low revs, which is a bit pointless if you have the noisy scissor gear and gears the 1998-2001 VFRs have.
I liked the VTec I test-rode, but I don't like Hondas with camchains: I've owned 4, and all were problematic. Plus the VTec servicing is much more complicated. Thank goodness the valve clearances on Hondas generally stay in spec.
I hope (haven't checked any on a bike since about 1993...)
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks