Understood! I'm not arguing with you. The observation I was making is that statistical rankings such as OECD are only part of the story. Rich countries can still have severe social problems, partially due to wealth being concentrated among the relatively few. For example, America is hardly egalitarian. I'm not being critical of other countries. All I'm saying is that the "grass is greener" scenario depends partially on the circumstances of individuals. It's also a shifting line in the sand due to other factors such as climate change, energy costs, finite natural resources etc. It's an incredibly complex equation for which there is no single "right answer".
Just like that time Microsoft gave us windows for free, or the time Mobil gave me free gas.
Sorry for looking a gift horse in the mouth - but independant, Mercer and free don't fit with me. If it were really the case then why isn't their head office in Auckland?
Mercer are not only the largest surveyors in the world, but probably the most savvy. I would not be surprised to see a catch like "Auckland best city in the world has direct correlation to Coffee being good for you".
You are right is saying the grass isn't greener elsewhere - but you have to question whether this is as good as it gets in NZ, and the downwards slope is looming.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Agreed. From MY standpoint, as a baby boomer (or a booming baby), the values and hopes/dreams of my "youth" for the country put the "shifting" line further up the economic prosperity parameter than is currently the fashion politically. So from where "I" sit, we are going backwards. Others, and you in particular, may have another view. Maybe I misunderstood yours to be more along the "green" scale, as these arguments tend to polarise ppl. Science was king when I was a lad, and NZers were held in high esteem, Ernest Rutherford (bit older than me tho) etc. And I love my outdoors, huntin, shootin fishin etc, but the greens have gotten into our collective psyche to the extend I believe we have become almost luddite in our national outlook. My 2 OE's so far, in my 20s in the 70's and this year, both to Europe, the contrast between the two trips has left me quite sad at how far we have dropped cf other countries...
Get your motor runnin, head out on the Highway ....
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
I'm a Baby Boomer too, educated and worked in the UK until my mid 20's and now recently semi-retired. Hardly a died in the wool greenie, I'm a mechanical engineer and have spent a spell working in the States as well as travelling extensively. Only the one-eyed would claim that NZ can't learn from other countries, and I mean not only the positives, but what to avoid too.
I know it's probably a trite thing to say with the serious issues facing both NZ and the rest of the world, but every time I fly back into the country, I still get that little thrill of being "home". That doesn't happen when visiting the UK.
It's a tough world, innit?
P.S And don't get me started on politicians giving out lollies in the shape of personal tax cuts. an infinitely better proposition to spend it on health, education and the sciences if we're going to improve as a nation.
Last edited by Blackbird; 24th June 2008 at 16:52.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Apparently not.
However we are slightly off topic and I'm happy to agree that there are many other areas where I would be only too happy to see NZ undertake more R&D
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
I read it. Just because Monsanto now say that they wont use them does nothing to prevent them or anyone else from further developing this research at any point in the future!
Anyway, I simply posted the article because you apeared to be denying such research existed.
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
I hate to say it, But your lacking your god-given dose of healthy scepticism, Big business has been known to lie, especially when untold billions of dollars are involved, yet you seem to have swallowed the entire line so much you will talk in absolutes. And any conflicting view you dismiss as crackpot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks