After many years on a TLS and having owned Ducatis i find this a bit odd,Valve clearances every 24000 kms isnt hard and its a piece of piss,why would a second hand 900ss tend to be better looked after?Think ive seen just as many shitty old Ducs as TLs,less to go wrong?biggest bugbear on an old TL would be the rotary damper mount cracking and at this stage in life most will have had there suspenders done already,if a same age Duc hasnt had them changed it will need doing.Dont get me wrong i love Ducatis and grew up with an old man obsessed with early 900SSs etc so much so that i wanted nothing else but to grow up and buy my own,i did so,not being the type of person to give a shit about the badge on the tank i found that the later model ones (at the time) left a lot to be desired,remember riding a 89 or 90 SS/sport and feeling..how do i put it,took the heap of shit back to the bike shop and declined there offer.In the TL the japs built a motor to die for,for sure they got a lot wrong but out of the box power wise it measured up to a 916 which on its own was some feat,i couldnt give a flying fuck about what happens on a race track but i do know that a well ridden TL will be planted fair and square up a 916s arse through real world roads such as the Hundaless etc if not in front of one.As for reliability/ease of maintenance etc give me the Jap one ta.
Bookmarks