Ms Newman wants it all to be reviewed, I tried to find the article but couldnt, Im unaware of any other party that will even touch it.
I have always voted for ACT, I know they get a bashing as being very right wing, but when you really get into the policies they promote they are balanced. Main reasons Im voting for them
1/ Law n Order is number ONE, Zero Tolerance for crime.
2/ Emmisions trading Scam legislation repelled
3/ Getting rid of the Bureacratic industry that has its grip on NZ and it ability to prosper
Have a look and tell me if you can find a better party to vote for
http://www.act.org.nz/files/pledge/20pointplan.pdf
http://www.act.org.nz/
And dont give me the anti Roger Douglas crap, if it wasnt for him we would still need a licence to subscribe to overseas magazine, and have the choice of one kinda fridge or floor covering, he got us out of the Communist stone age era and took us to the modern world, tho unfortunetly to have it fucked up by nanny state control and Bludger dependants.
the country where it sits is fucked, thanks to the last couple of decades of bollocks
http://www.act.org.nz/files/pledge/20pointplan.pdf
Ive run out of fucks to give
Au contrer, you should check out the democrat housing policies and Obama and his time with ACORN...
A good post from AdamSmith
Lindsay Mitchell is a good authority on straight thinking on this stuff. ACT really are the only party with ideas.
Oh, whoopy do, joy unbounded, a whole 1% less to the government. Thank you so much Mr Key, are you sure you can afford it. What about the other 38% y' ikey barstool.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Then why should I have to pay for them as well? I didn't even get to nail your ex wife.
Don't take it personally. My post was directed at liarbours "cash for babies" policy encouraging NZ low lifes to breed like rabbits which has subsequently placed a another significant burden on social services.
Given his grasp of economics as displayed during the last election you could well be right.
Interesting to see that even tho' he had made a mistake with his figures he took no notice of Cullen or Peters trying to point out his mistake and carried on with confidence. It was a classic display of the theory that it doesn't matter so much about the substance of your speech as how you deliver it.
Smile and look like you know what you are talking about and the public will think you're OK.
He's definitely out of his depth all round. But you have to remember that he is only a second term politician and so is probably doing pretty well. Well certainly better than Bill English or Don Brash. He's still in the kiddies pool tho'.
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.
One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.
One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
Well good thinking about those hi tech tax credits!
Who needs R & D anyhow, given that all the smart guys are moving across the ditch?
"People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks