Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: Ducati 1198

  1. #1
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17

    Ducati 1198

    Yup, they've upped the capacity another 100cc.
    Check it here.


    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  2. #2
    Join Date
    26th January 2008 - 06:27
    Bike
    78 gs550 suzi &1978 Yamaha XS1100
    Location
    pram
    Posts
    128
    Blog Entries
    2
    Maby santa will breng me one coool bike

  3. #3
    Join Date
    30th November 2007 - 11:49
    Bike
    Triumph Sprint St 07, G650gs BMW
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    515
    So is the 1098, being replaced by the 1198?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    16th September 2003 - 11:36
    Posts
    6,427
    Quote Originally Posted by raftn View Post
    So is the 1098, being replaced by the 1198?
    correct
    there be an 1198, 1198s, 1198r next year.

    the 1098r is running an 1198 motor anyway.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    What next - 1199?
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  6. #6
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by vifferman View Post
    What next - 1199?
    Hmm, 1098 ... 1198 ... ... ... 1298!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Badjelly View Post
    Hmm, 1098 ... 1198 ... ... ... 1298!
    It's not quite that simple. Like when Ducati were trying to keep below 900cc, it was 851, 888; below one litre it was 900, 916, 996, 998, 999. Now they're staying below 1200cc (for the time being), to stay within WSB rules.
    Often times, the number doesn't reflect the displacement anyway.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  8. #8
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by vifferman View Post
    Often times, the number doesn't reflect the displacement anyway.
    the 1098 is actually 1099.00 ccm (or 67.06 cubic inches)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    the 1098 is actually 1099.00 ccm (or 67.06 cubic inches)
    It's all about marketing!
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    26th September 2005 - 14:25
    Bike
    00 Gixxer 750 and ZX10 tricycle
    Location
    Teh Love
    Posts
    2,922
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    the 1098 is actually 1099.00 ccm (or 67.06 cubic inches)
    Homo know it all
    Built for speed, not for comfort

  11. #11
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by Kornholio View Post
    Homo know it all
    thats why i own the race team and you just peddle the thing.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    the 1098 is actually 1099.00 ccm (or 67.06 cubic inches)
    Are you sure? I make it 67.06509476 cubic inches. So, If you were to use Swedish rounding to 2 decimal points, that would make it 67.07 cubic inches.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    Are you sure? I make it 67.06509476 cubic inches. So, If you were to use Swedish rounding to 2 decimal points, that would make it 67.07 cubic inches.
    well that makes it 1099.08 cc's or 219.82 metric teaspoons

  14. #14
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    well that makes it 1099.08 cc's or 219.82 metric teaspoons
    Maybe this explains their reliability issues. Their tolerances are way out.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    Maybe this explains their reliability issues. Their tolerances are way out.
    and this one tolerated quite alot -

    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/List...x?id=187103193

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •