Terrorist (namely muslim) cowards

**Winston001** · 4th December 2008, 18:25

Originally Posted by YamahaR64Life

The Indian government has declared a security status of 'war' already and will immobilize troops to the borders if I know anything. Watch the news folks for there is going to be some major arse wooping. No negotiations with terrorists, kill them all. Jai Hind !

Mumbai will always be a home to me, just as much as NZ is. It hurts so bad to see it burning.

Yes I hope they do immobilise troops........

But seriously, Mumbai isn't burning. It's an exciting and vibrant city of 19 million people and almost every one of those inhabitants will be going on with their daily lives. You know as well as I do that for the ordinary Indian its a safe place. The biggest problem is mob hysteria and that does pose a real threat to national and regional security.

**Scouse** · 4th December 2008, 19:00

Originally Posted by 98tls

Entschuldigen,Juden?.

Nice try fritz but no, Liverpool Protestant and proud of it.

**enigma51** · 4th December 2008, 19:23

Originally Posted by YamahaR64Life

There will be no peace and no mercy, not till the guilty are punished. If India's money hungry politicians do nothing, there will be trouble from within. Indians are not known to shurk away from a threat, and this is a threat to Natiaonal security. The Indian government has declared a security status of 'war' already and will immobilize troops to the borders if I know anything. Watch the news folks for there is going to be some major arse wooping. No negotiations with terrorists, kill them all. Jai Hind !

Mumbai will always be a home to me, just as much as NZ is. It hurts so bad to see it burning.

Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity

**Cr1MiNaL** · 4th December 2008, 20:46

Originally Posted by hdus001

I dont think war is even an option when the two countries are nuclear and are closely matched in military strength.

Closely matched in military strength? R you serious? I hope not.

Nukes, well yes they are devastating, but not if you strike first !

It wouldn't surprise me if we saw an American - Indian coalition army fuck up Pakistan, kinda like taking a dirt bike to the back o yer garden.

**SixPackBack** · 5th December 2008, 06:00

Originally Posted by YamahaR64Life

Closely matched in military strength? R you serious? I hope not.

Nukes, well yes they are devastating, but not if you strike first !

It wouldn't surprise me if we saw an American - Indian coalition army fuck up Pakistan, kinda like taking a dirt bike to the back o yer garden.

Get real. Obama will be backing out of further wars not getting involved in pissy neighbour disputes.......get some perspective!.........launching a nuclear strike over the Mumbai Hotel incident makes as much sense as invading Iraq over 911.

**jrandom** · 5th December 2008, 07:08

Originally Posted by YamahaR64Life

The Indian government... will immobilize troops

**Cr1MiNaL** · 5th December 2008, 07:45

Originally Posted by SixPackBack

launching a nuclear strike over the Mumbai Hotel incident makes as much sense as invading Iraq over 911.

yesss... and your point is? It still happened!

**SixPackBack** · 5th December 2008, 08:59

Originally Posted by YamahaR64Life

yesss... and your point is? It still happened!

My point is attacking Pakistan over a pissy little event is sabre rattling and nothing more. 150 people die=millions in a Nuclear attack?

**98tls** · 5th December 2008, 09:07

Originally Posted by SixPackBack

Get real. Obama will be backing out of further wars not getting involved in pissy neighbour disputes.......get some perspective!.........launching a nuclear strike over the Mumbai Hotel incident makes as much sense as invading Iraq over 911.

Mate if we believe "sense" will prevail then i am off to start digging a shelter.

**hdus001** · 5th December 2008, 11:41

Originally Posted by SixPackBack

My point is attacking Pakistan over a pissy little event is sabre rattling and nothing more. 150 people die=millions in a Nuclear attack?

Exactly.

And killing millions in a nuclear strike just to kill the 0.1% who are terrorists makes you no better than the terrorists themselves.

**Winston001** · 5th December 2008, 13:12

Originally Posted by SixPackBack

.........launching a nuclear strike over the Mumbai Hotel incident makes as much sense as invading Iraq over 911.

One day historians will be able to make sense of the Iraqi invasion (which I supported by the way) but there wasn't any one reason - which I think is your point.

Certainly the US populace looked for revenge after 9/11 and Afghanistan received it. Saddam Hussein had tried to have President Bush (Senior) assassinated and his son, George W Bush held a personal vendetta for that.

The Weapons of Mass Destruction intelligence was flawed although Saddam wanted the West to think he had such weapons = power, don't mess with me.

Oil - this is a popular reason for the war but the US didn't need to invade to get it. Lets be realistic - virtually evey oil producing nation in the world relies like a heroin addict on the mega dollars they get each day by selling oil. Politics comes a poor second to money so there was never any danger the oil would dry up.

Political influence - this was also a reason for the war. Geopolitically the Middle East was looking very unstable, with Islamic radicalism and nuclear weapons in development or on hand.

None of those reasons exist to cause India, let alone the USA to go to war with Pakistan. What is more likely is a nervous Pakistani commander (or an Indian) will see what he thinks is an attack on the Kashmir border and let loose. War isn't always logical.