Funny how they are so reticent about entering gang houses.
booook book book book
Funny how they are so reticent about entering gang houses.
booook book book book
Allow me to recount a conversation overheard recently:
Drongo 1: "How's your Police application going?"
Drongo 2: "They didn't like my 5 driving while disqualified convictions,so
they said to keep my nose clean for 18 months and I should be sweet"
Last time I looked contempt of court made you unsuitable to be a police officer.
Bwahahahahaha....
What a load of bollocks.
You sit outside the Gang HQ 24/7???? If so, get a life, go for a motorbike ride......
Still does. Drongo Two is talking it up for his mate. Drongo two is fulla shite, and Drongo one is lapping it all up....
I guess it depends on how well you understand the rules !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Top cop refuses breath test
Like everyone, he is entitled to, say lawyers
By EMILY WATT - The Dominion Post | Saturday, 28 February 2009
One of the country's top police officers has been cleared of wrongdoing for refusing to take a breath test after he was reported driving home erratically from a police bar.
Police say the man was "entitled" to refuse to comply with officers who knocked on his door.
Superintendent Graham Thomas, the head of police prosecutions at Police National Headquarters, has been cleared by a police investigation and is now on six months' paid "medical rehabilitation".
Criminal lawyers say everyone has a right to act within their legal rights. But many members of the public are convicted after being breathalysed in their homes, either because they believed they had to follow police demands or because they felt they should front up to their wrongdoing.
Some police spoken to by The Dominion Post said the officer, who is in charge of every drink-driving case in the country, ought to have fronted up.
Mr Thomas was reportedly visited after a member of the public reported erratic driving on a Friday night in December. A community patrol car went to his house and officers knocked on his door.
Police human resources manager Wayne Annan said the man, whom he would not identify, was asked to give a breath test at his home, but he declined "as he was entitled to do".
He reportedly told officers he had been home all night. Mr Thomas was not home when The Dominion Post visited yesterday, but a police-issue car was parked in his driveway. Police would not say if it was being driven on the night in question.
Mr Annan said police had completed the investigation and employment matters were concluded.
Drink-drive lawyer Chris Reid said that, although many members of the public had been convicted in similar circumstances, Mr Thomas was acting within the law.
"Morally, he should probably have done it, but legally, he didn't have to," Mr Reid said. "There's no doubt if someone knocked on my door and asked me to do a breath test, I would tell them to go to hell."
Lawyer Michael Bott said clients had been arrested for failing to provide a sample when police arrived at their house. "What concerns me is the double standard." But anyone who knew the law was entitled to apply it.
A spokesman for Police Minister Judith Collins said she would not comment on an employment issue.
Former police commissioner Peter Doone resigned in 2000 after controversy over whether he abused his power by getting out of a car and speaking to a rookie constable who stopped it on election night 1999. The car was being driven by his partner Robyn Johnstone after it was seen driving without headlights on, but the couple were allowed to drive away without being breath-tested.
A report by deputy commissioner Rob Robinson said Mr Doone should have insisted on "the full treatment for the driver to dispel any later suggestions of insobriety".
The State Services Commission last year cleared Commissioner Howard Broad of claims he avoided a breath test in 1992. When stopped, Mr Broad admitted he had been drinking with a meal and the officer told him to park and stop driving.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
I guess this proves that this certain area of RBT enforcement is still very much a grey area legally.
Oh, just an update. One week from the day I first emailed the complaints authority, I had received their outcome to move it to the local traffic police dept. I'm still waiting for their follow up interview. Guess they are really busy..................
Its not grey at all. Just read the legislation, which really makes it quite clear.
Quite right. The Herald reporting makes this clear.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10559186
It is not an offence to refuse an initial breath-screening test. But a police officer can then require someone to take an evidential breath test. Refusing to take the second breath test is an offence.
The greatest pleasure of my recent life has been speed on the road. . . . I lose detail at even moderate speed but gain comprehension. . . . I could write for hours on the lustfulness of moving swiftly.
--T.E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
I'm interested to know why the police didn't follow up on who was actually driving the car erratically, assuming it was an govt issued vechile, then there would be few people legally entiteled to drive it, and the processof illemination would be straight forward in my view.
Assuming the big chief didn't tell a porky (chuckle) pie to the constable.
Coppa's don't tell porkies (chuckle) do they?![]()
some cops do, some dont.
from what i have seen they will lie to save themselves.
you cant trust the pigs
It does. The Harold missed a quote from Chris Reid which appears in the Dom, though...Originally Posted by Harold
So it appears the dude was within his rights, as it seems unlikely the officers were on his tail up the driveway. It also appears that he's either terminally stupid or guilty as hell.Originally Posted by Chris Reid
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks