Dunno how many hre realise but a lot of jap four wheel vehicles if not all are speed restricted to 180km/h give or take 10km/h.
So why doesnt the gubbinment insist the speed restricters be altered to a max of 140km/h?
Wonder what would happen
Dunno how many hre realise but a lot of jap four wheel vehicles if not all are speed restricted to 180km/h give or take 10km/h.
So why doesnt the gubbinment insist the speed restricters be altered to a max of 140km/h?
Wonder what would happen
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
it would save alot of lives for sure but restricters are easily disconected. It is a good thought though,
If practive makes perfect, but no bodys perfect then why practice?
The more you try to stop humans from killing themselves, the more they will figure out ways to beat the system.
This is true - but $10 says a hacker will have the system reprogrammed in 5 minutes flat.
Plus, it would take time to filter down. It's not the new cars that are killing people left, right and centre. It's the old dungers. If it becomes compulsory for all NEW cars, it'd take forever to take over the whole vehicle fleet.
I'd prefer better driver training (have you seen Germany's, holy moly) and restrictions for cagers on the vehicles they can drive before they are fully licenced.
The logistics are insurmountable
NZ is not a big enough market for Japan to cater to our whims. So we would not get new vehicles with "our" choice of restriction as OEM. There's never going to be a "New Zealand specific" model .
The gubbermint COULD mandate after market restrictors, like those fitted to some truck fleets. But an aftermarket restrictor is always going to be easy to disable . The ones in the trucks aren't because the companies that fit them of their own volition are obviously not going to disable them. And although the drivers hate the they don't hate them enough to risk their jobs. Boi-Racer, anther story. He'd have it disabled in an afternoon
And even if you managed to get them fitted to all new cars, what about all the used imports? They're not going to have them.
Not to mention that a LOT of the fleet is more than 10 years old. Go look on Tardme for vehicles older than 1999 . There's a lot , aren't there?
The real risk would come if a big country , like the UK or USA (dunno if Oz would be big enough, they're not THAT big on a world scale), demanded it. A country big enough for the Japs to say "Yes BigCustomer-San, we do". Then our gubbermint could jump on the band-wagon. Even if Japan complies, you then have to deal with Europe, USA, Taiwan, Korea, Russia. How long d' y' reckon before you can get all that lot singing from the same song sheet ? Especially if one of them sees a competitive advantage to supplying vehicles which aren't restricted.
And really, how many fatalities occur at over 140kph ? Bugger all I suspect. And how many of those would not occur at 140kph ?
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
a few of the new euro based fords already have limiters in the pcm that can be set by dealerships...funny as fuck when ya reset the bosses car on a friday arvo![]()
Hater of haters since 2012
Yeah, but then the hand-wringers would be all akimbo because it's not happening now.
And then, if it's 140, why not 130? Oh people are still dying, better make it 120, or 110.
Then it becomes "have a man waving a red flag walking in front of the car".
Although that would help deal with unemployment.
And the gummint could mandate for compulsory restricters (to be checked at the WOF check) but it'd be like those people who run "track only" mufflers on their bikes and swap them over to the originals for WOFs.
The law only applies to you if you want it to.
How ever would the Prime minister (read Helen Clark) get anywhere on time if there were speed restrictors on their limo's...![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks