Red Fridays?

[Usarka]

One female .. in comparison to how many men?

So you understand what its like to be told what to do.

All it is, is a power struggle .. one you obviously support. Nice.

As a percentage, fermale UK prime ministers are more likely to start wars than male ones!

[Dave Lobster]

As a percentage, fermale UK prime ministers are more likely to start wars than male ones!

And.. finishing them on time, with a win.

[FJRider]

Maybe the soft cock peacemongers wanted something different.

Many years ago, I was verbally abused by a young woman, (I presumed her to be one of those soft cock peacemongers)who had taken exception to the uniform I wore. The vile words of hatred she spoke, made me wonder what member, of what armed force had hurt her to make her feel that way.

So I started talking to her. She said she was merely "anti-war". ... and her comments were not aimed at me personally (sure felt like it). She went on to say that even if New Zealand was invaded by another country.... she would do nothing, and not encourage anyone, to fight to repel them. It was not worth it.

I asked her what would she do if I dragged her into an alley-way, and attempted to have sex with her. Her reply.... she would do her damdest to stop me, and fight me to her last breath.

She would do nothing in defence of our country... but would fight for the preservation of her own dubious "honour".

The cause you fight for is what matters, be it your country, your friends, or your own family.... ideals you could never possibily imagine untill its hit you that the only choice you have ... and still live with yourself... is fight.

[fire eyes]

Many years ago, I was verbally abused by a young woman, (I presumed her to be one of those soft cock peacemongers)who had taken exception to the uniform I wore. The vile words of hatred she spoke, made me wonder what member, of what armed force had hurt her to make her feel that way.

So I started talking to her. She said she was merely "anti-war". ... and her comments were not aimed at me personally (sure felt like it). She went on to say that even if New Zealand was invaded by another country.... she would do nothing, and not encourage anyone, to fight to repel them. It was not worth it.

I asked her what would she do if I dragged her into an alley-way, and attempted to have sex with her. Her reply.... she would do her damdest to stop me, and fight me to her last breath.

She would do nothing in defence of our country... but would fight for the preservation of her own dubious "honour".

The cause you fight for is what matters, be it your country, your friends, or your own family.... ideals you could never possibily imagine untill its hit you that the only choice you have ... and still live with yourself... is fight.

My original post wasn't to disregard the armed forces when you have to protect and defend. My approach was in relation to the self absorbed governments that condon and initiate pain and suffering of the innocent .. if my reference to the male dominance in said governments offend you ... my apologies .. but it still seems like a male dominated field to wage war, suffering and pain ..

[FJRider]

My original post wasn't to disregard the armed forces when you have to protect and defend. My approach was in relation to the self absorbed governments that condon and initiate pain and suffering of the innocent .. if my reference to the male dominance in said governments offend you ... my apologies .. but it still seems like a male dominated field to wage war, suffering and pain ..

The powers that be in goverment, that make decisions on how a war is pressed, try (usually)to minimise the effects on "innocent" casualtys. Often there is no choice. Fact of life and death... in war.

Male dominance is prevelent in todays world... but that was not always the case. Women in power made similar decisions. In most western world goverments even today, women do play an important role in the decision making process.

The size of cocks of the politictions has less to do with decisions made, than the real reason of a "good" war. That is the amount of money that can be made by the goverment. Or their supporting businessess, IN/DURING that war.

No offence was taken... no apology is required... but thankyou for offering one...

[Usarka]

what is it good for

[FJRider]

what is it good for

employment... unlimited job vacancies appear ...

[fire eyes]

The powers that be in goverment, that make decisions on how a war is pressed, try (usually)to minimise the effects on "innocent" casualtys. Often there is no choice. Fact of life and death... in war.

Male dominance is prevelent in todays world... but that was not always the case. Women in power made similar decisions. In most western world goverments even today, women do play an important role in the decision making process.

The size of cocks of the politictions has less to do with decisions made, than the real reason of a "good" war. That is the amount of money that can be made by the goverment. Or their supporting businessess, IN/DURING that war.

No offence was taken... no apology is required... but thankyou for offering one...

I totally disagree ... what is a 'good war' ?????

Ego/power/greed (simplified by lack of cock) definitely has it's relevence. Perhaps not a term you are comfortable with, I will refrain from this description.

The apology was not for you personally .. it was in the event you have taken what I have said out of context ... which apparently it still does ...

We will obviously agree to disagree.

[James Deuce]

I totally disagree ... what is a 'good war' ?????

Ego/power/greed (simplified by lack of cock) definitely has it's relevence. Perhaps not a term you are comfortable with, I will refrain from this description.

The apology was not for you personally .. it was in the event you have taken what I have said out of context ... which apparently it still does ...

We will obviously agree to disagree.

It's your gender biased view that's out of whack. It has little to do with small cocks and everything to do with protecting people from perceived harm. Men and Women in positions of power do what is necessary to protect people they care about. That can range from Parents to Heads of State. Gender has little to do with the efficacy of a response to percieved threat, more so now that you don't need to be on the swinging end of an axe to make your point.

[fire eyes]

It's your gender biased view that's out of whack. It has little to do with small cocks and everything to do with protecting people from perceived harm. Men and Women in positions of power do what is necessary to protect people they care about. That can range from Parents to Heads of State. Gender has little to do with the efficacy of a response to percieved threat, more so now that you don't need to be on the swinging end of an axe to make your point.

I am not talking about your average parent .. I am talking about governments. The ones who make the decisions .. not swinging the axe .. just following through on my original post ...

[Gubb]

what is it good for

[James Deuce]

I am not talking about your average parent .. I am talking about governments. The ones who make the decisions .. not swinging the axe .. just following through on my original post ...

That's why I said "Heads of State" in there. It does encompass effectively the same range of emotional and practical responses to a perceived threat though.

War is generally a response to an economic crisis or a way of protecting or growing an economy. At the root of every despot, elected leader, theocratic army, or monarchy is a group of people trying to protect a way of life. How those leaders view themselves and their way of life determines whether or not they will be aggressors or reluctantly mount a response to aggression.

In the 20th Century, cocks (or lack thereof) became almost a non-issue during WWII for the "Western" powers, and certainly weren't an issue for Russia. The cock was put back in warfare during Vietnam and then removed entirely from the board for the Falklands, never to rear it's head as a component of a modern action, except for a few Generals born in the '20s and '30s (all retired during the '80s) who really struggle with the idea of chicks killing people. The US Navy's logistics arm is run by a woman, the first US woman promoted to Admiral's rank in a fleet command position. Logistics are the most single important factor in killing lots of people.

[fire eyes]

At the root of every despot, elected leader, theocratic army, or monarchy is a group of people trying to protect a way of life. How those leaders view themselves and their way of life determines whether or not they will be aggressors or reluctantly mount a response to aggression.

Precisely ... which usually results in devastation, pain and suffering ... male dominance .. more men in positions of power than women ... cannot dispute the some women do play a part .. but as a whole?

Gender is relevent James ..

[Gubb]

Precisely ... which usually results in devastation, pain and suffering ... male dominance .. more men in positions of power than women ... cannot dispute the some women do play a part .. but as a whole?

Gender is relevent James ..

More brown people are in Prison than White people.

Ergo all brown people must be scum.

There is no other explanation apparently.

[FJRider]

I totally disagree ... what is a 'good war' ?????

Ego/power/greed (simplified by lack of cock) definitely has it's relevence. Perhaps not a term you are comfortable with, I will refrain from this description.

The apology was not for you personally .. it was in the event you have taken what I have said out of context ... which apparently it still does ...

We will obviously agree to disagree.

Those that pull the trigger decide how many die...... good wars... every body goes home afterwards.

Ego/power/greed.... it was hard to be there, pull the trigger, cant be easy to SEND people to war...

understanding the others opinion helps... but I agree to talk more when asked... if asked.