I can eat wheat/dairy with no apparent problems
I know to limit my wheat/dairy or will suffer consequences
I avoid wheat/dairy due to ill effects
I'm celiac or have severe medical problems with wheat/dairy
Last year they tested me for a gluten intolerance. Thank GOD the tests came out fine. Unfortunatley I am salicylate sensitive. For a few months I was reduced to plain rice, plain meat, water, iceburg lettuce. After 10 days I was able to add in one thing every few days.
Needless to say, I gave up on that all after awhile. I couldn't eat out, I couldn't have easy food, I had to read EVERY packet because there is never ever ever any mention of salicylates in any shops and now I basically eat what I feel like eating, but I generally have to avoid fruit and vegetables because they are the worst for me.
I'm gonna make it so PC
My daughter has encountered a fair amount of scornful dismissal of her allergies, during five years or so of increasing misery. Few people understand the lifestyle difficulties that such allergies cause.
She is currently in Auckland, where she will spend the next three months undergoing treatment for her allergies. Not easy for a (very emotionally young) 21 year old to be away from her family, fiance and friends for that time, but it has to be done. The treatment is costing thousands - guess who is paying...?
As a child, she had a few food allergies that went undiagnosed for some time. In her mid-teens, the allergies worsened. Around that time, she did the teen-girl thing of trying vegetarianism - it didn't last long - it turned out she is allergic to almost everything except red meat...
Test and trials at the Auckland Allergy Clinic have revealed that many of her food allergies could be secondary to her extreme hayfever. Recent studies have shown that treating the primary allergy can result in the marked reduction of wide-ranging food allergies. Her worst allergies (beans, legumes) will likely remain, but it is hoped that the desensitisation process will reduce or eliminate many of the others.
Due to the severity of her condition, we could find no-one south of Auckland willing to treat her, as the treatment carries significant risk of severe anaphylaxis. We can only hope (for her sake) that it works...
In the meantime, if anyone else has family or a friend with worsening food allergies, do they also have chronic hayfever...? If so, get it checked out.
Last edited by Virago; 21st April 2009 at 14:09.
Can I believe the magic of your size... (The Shirelles)
Other than red meat, what does your daughter eat? And what sort of testing are they doing on her? When they discovered my salicylate sensitivity (it can't be tested using blood or anything) they put me on the elimination diet. The food was boring and depressing but I felt so much better.
I'm gonna make it so PC
Problem is that the primary problem (e.g. hay fever) is constantly causing the body's defences to be in a state of high alert so that otherwise minor allergens then stimulate a far greater reaction than would otherwise be the case. It's all pretty technical but revolves around histamine levels driving allergic responses, and vice versa.
She can eat some fruits and vegetables, provided they are well cooked - nothing raw. Imagine life without being able to eat a piece of fruit... Dairy only in very small doses. Rice is okay.
All seafood is out. A mild reaction to chicken.
Her reactions usually involve a skin rash, swelling (particularly the throat), and vomiting. Going to a restaurant invariably involves leaving early, and lots of roadside stops after...
Her worst allergy is beans (navy beans, kidney beans) - just being in the same room can cause a very noticable reaction. Consuming any will result in immediate anaphylaxis. She carries an "Epi-pen" - a one-shot adrenalin hypodermic - at all times.
The main testing involves a "skin-prick" process. Rows of dots are put along the inner arm skin (about 20 or so on each arm). A drop of liquid containing a minute amount of varying allergen is placed on each dot, and then pricked through into the skin. The size of the resulting rash determines the extent of the allergy. Most of Amy's rashes overlapped each other...
The treatment involves being injected each week with specially concocted vials containing the allergens specific to her. The dose is increased over around twelve weeks, until she reaches a "maintenance" level. Injections will then probably continue for two or three years. The early stage is the most critical, and could result in quite severe anaphylactic shock unless carefully managed. Hence the reluctance of the doctors down here to take it on.
The process in called "desensitisation".
You're on to it. It's a never-ending vicious cycle. The misery caused is quite substantial.
Amy has been on alarmingly huge doses of anti-histamines, but the side-effects from the long-term use of those causes other health problems.
Last edited by Virago; 21st April 2009 at 15:04.
Can I believe the magic of your size... (The Shirelles)
That's the problem. As I alluded to in post #30, the medical fraternity tend to struggle with the multifaceted problems they are often faced with in patients that are seriously compromised by allergies. Circular cause and effects scenarios take a bit of understanding when one has been trained in predominantly single illness/cure treatment regimes![]()
Most definitely, under the public health system. We've had to go private (at our own cost) for diagnosis and treatment. Money talks...
The perception of "middle class indulgence" is just one of the public misconceptions. Many have suggested that parents create hyper-allergic children by raising them in an obsessively sterile home - those who have seen our home will have a good laugh about that one...![]()
Can I believe the magic of your size... (The Shirelles)
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks