Expensive wheelie

[Grahameeboy]

Kinematic equations from measured speed and elapsed time or distance covered.

But do they do that no just guess.

And Marty this place would get boring without threads like this.

Excellent SirAlex...................

[WINJA]

the wankers are the pollies that pushed this bad legislation through. cops just doing his job - someone doing a wheelie in front of a cop at a crash site is a complete tosser/loser/wanker, and should expect to be pinged.

+1 , TIME AND PLACE ETC ETC. BUT THAT ACELERATION LAW IS STUPID AND IF A COP ENFORCES IT HES A STUPID CUNT

[SARGE]

pulling a mono past a cop and being surprised when they show up at your house???


priceless

[sAsLEX]

pulling a mono past a cop and being surprised when they show up at your house???


priceless

They must of failed sprot bike 101:

How to cover ones plate.

[SARGE]

They must of failed sprot bike 101:

How to cover ones plate.

lesson #1 a truer biker will ensure his number plate is securely affixed ....









to his workbench

[imdying]

lol at this thread, the cop did the right thing. The OPs friend is a retard that got what he deserved. The cops are not the issue here... I can't count the number of times of gotten off the stupidest of shite in my youth, and +1 for my mates... the issue is that how did someone retarded enough to do wheelies in front of cops that he knew were there get a license?

[The Pastor]

Ah! But the rear wheel has an increase in traction with the additional weight on it - surely?

Weight is indipendent of friction.

[WINJA]

Weight is indipendent of friction.

AND OCASIONALLY INDEPENDENT

[SARGE]

Weight is indipendent of friction.

oh fuck... why do i bother


HITCHER!!!!!!!!


back in the box douchebag

[The Pastor]

tru bro stick a rota init G

[marty]

AND OCASIONALLY INDEPENDENT

And occasionally, I'm sure you meant

[Dafe]

Try this equation......

Loss of Traction = Offence under the Boy Racer act = Valid Vehicle impoundment.

This is one of labours recently introduced policies, It was exercised about a year ago with a rather wealthy Tauranga buisnessman flooring his latest model mercedes out of an intersection when the lights went green.
The screeching tyres were claimed to be a loss of traction and hence his vehicle was impounded for 28 days and the driver was fined under the boy racer act.

The driver tried to claim that the traction control had been accidently knocked and switched off, therefore his usual amount of traction wasn't available, and hence the screetching! The driver still lost badly in court.

[Jamezo]

Weight is indipendent of friction.

Nope. For a static (which is what a tyre surface basically is in relation to the road) frictional force (or potential opposition force, as it really is), this force is directly proportional to the downwards weight force.

So, it could be argued, the total friction from both wheels is conserved during a wheelie, because of the weight re-distribution! No loss of traction here Ossifer!

[AllanB]

I'd tell the judge he was on P at the time as from what I see on TV and the papers they then reduce your sentence due to being out of your mind. Arse-wipes would get a longer term from me for taking the shit in the first place.

[iwilde]

Nothing against wheelies, but doing it in front of a cop and expecting to get away with it? Plain stupid for leaving his # plate on! I don't know the true legalities of the law, but wouldn't being on one wheel count as loss of control as you cant steer or brake as efficiently as if you've got both wheels on the ground?