Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 80

Thread: The 800s are faster!

  1. #31
    Join Date
    2nd February 2005 - 13:41
    Bike
    600RR3
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,684
    Wooohooo, go Colin! I'm a big Rossi fan, but I'd love to see the Texan do well this year.

    Does anyone know if the 800's have a weight advantage over the 990's?
    ...

  2. #32
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyB View Post
    Honda also firmly believed they had the most powerful and usable engine. 990/5 = 198. 198 x 4 = 792. Honda assumed that all they would have to do is lop the 5th cylinder off and they'd have the winning engine.
    That's kind of a weird synopsis.

    Honda have been making V4s for years, so they know a thing or two about them. Back in the 80s their VF750 was cleaning up in the US in sportbike racing. And what about the RC45?

    Their RC211V was essentially a V4 with an extra cylinder tacked on: it has two pairs of cylinders each sharing a crankpin (as in the VFR750 and VFR800), and then the fifth cylinder is slotted in on its own crankpin.
    And to start with, Honda did have the most powerful bike. Because they were well prepared for the change to 990cc (I think they instigated it?) the other teams were playing catch-up, and it was at least a season before they had the same sort of power as Honda. They were undoubtedly behind the change to 800cc as well, having been developing several possible engines long before the change was announced.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  3. #33
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Toast View Post
    Does anyone know if the 800's have a weight advantage over the 990's?
    This wot you want Toast?

    MotoGP Class Specs

    Minimum Weight

    # of Cylinders / 2004 Min / 2007 Min / Difference
    2 Cylinder / 135 kg / 137 kg / 2 kg
    3 Cylinder / 135 kg / 140.5 kg / 5.5 kg
    4 Cylinder / 145 kg / 148 kg / 3 kg
    5 Cylinder /145 kg / 155.5 kg / 10.5 kg
    6 Cylinder / 155 kg / 163 kg / 8 kg

    In 2005, fuel tank capacity was reduced by 2 litres to 24 litres
    In 2006, fuel tank capacity was reduced by a further 2 litres to 22 litres
    From 2007 onwards and for a minimum period of five years, FIM has regulated in MotoGP class that two-stroke bikes will no longer be allowed, and engines will be limited to 800 cc four-strokes. The maximum fuel capacity will be 21 litres.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    Quote Originally Posted by denill View Post
    This wot you want Toast?

    MotoGP Class Specs

    Minimum Weight

    # of Cylinders / 2004 Min / 2007 Min / Difference
    2 Cylinder / 135 kg / 137 kg / 2 kg
    3 Cylinder / 135 kg / 140.5 kg / 5.5 kg
    4 Cylinder / 145 kg / 148 kg / 3 kg
    5 Cylinder /145 kg / 155.5 kg / 10.5 kg
    6 Cylinder / 155 kg / 163 kg / 8 kg

    In 2005, fuel tank capacity was reduced by 2 litres to 24 litres
    In 2006, fuel tank capacity was reduced by a further 2 litres to 22 litres
    From 2007 onwards and for a minimum period of five years, FIM has regulated in MotoGP class that two-stroke bikes will no longer be allowed, and engines will be limited to 800 cc four-strokes. The maximum fuel capacity will be 21 litres.
    So apart from being smaller capacity than the previous class they are also heavier - but faster??

  5. #35
    Join Date
    2nd February 2005 - 13:41
    Bike
    600RR3
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,684
    Quote Originally Posted by denill View Post
    So apart from being smaller capacity than the previous class they are also heavier - but faster??
    Wow, very interesting...maybe the manufacturers will start bragging about their streetbikes being heavier and less powerful than the previous year now?
    ...

  6. #36
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    Quote Originally Posted by denill View Post
    This wot you want Toast?

    MotoGP Class Specs

    Minimum Weight

    # of Cylinders / 2004 Min / 2007 Min / Difference
    2 Cylinder / 135 kg / 137 kg / 2 kg
    3 Cylinder / 135 kg / 140.5 kg / 5.5 kg
    4 Cylinder / 145 kg / 148 kg / 3 kg
    5 Cylinder /145 kg / 155.5 kg / 10.5 kg
    6 Cylinder / 155 kg / 163 kg / 8 kg

    In 2005, fuel tank capacity was reduced by 2 litres to 24 litres
    In 2006, fuel tank capacity was reduced by a further 2 litres to 22 litres
    From 2007 onwards and for a minimum period of five years, FIM has regulated in MotoGP class that two-stroke bikes will no longer be allowed, and engines will be limited to 800 cc four-strokes. The maximum fuel capacity will be 21 litres.
    Readers may be interested in the - Source Of Information:

    Lota info there.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    MotoGP Official Test: Qatar

    Day Two Official Times

    1. Colin Edwards – Yamaha Factory – 1’56.296

    2. Valentino Rossi – Yamaha Factory – 1’56.537

    3. Dani Pedrosa – Repsol Honda – 1’56.712

    4. Carlos Checa – LCR Honda – 1’56. 874

    5. Casey Stoner – Ducati Marlboro - 1’57.040

    6. John Hopkins – Rizla Suzuki – 1’57.065

    7. Shinya Nakano – Konica Minolta Honda – 1’57.274

    8. Randy de Puniet – Kawasaki Racing – 1’57.288

    9. Kenny Roberts Jr – Team Roberts – 1’57.504

    10. Marco Melandri – Gresini Honda – 1’57.591

    11. Nicky Hayden – Repsol Honda – 1’57.629

    12. Loris Capirossi – Ducati Marlboro - 1’57.698

    13. Chris Vermeulen – Rizla Suzuki - 1’57.770

    14. Alex Hofmann – Pramac d’Antin Ducati - 1’57.999

    15. Alex Barros – Pramac d’Antin Ducati - 1’58.513

    16. Makoto Tamada – Yamaha Tech 3 - 1’58.610

    17. Toni Elias – Gresini Honda – 1’58.990

    18. Sylvain Guintoli – Yamaha Tech 3 – 1’59.138

    19. Shinichi Ito – Ducati TTT – 1’59.617

    20. Andrew Pitt – Ilmor GP – 2’02.453

  8. #38
    Join Date
    15th February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda CBR600RR9
    Location
    Invercargill
    Posts
    750
    So apart from being smaller capacity than the previous class they are also heavier - but faster??
    Quicker NOT faster, there is a difference,

    also, i don't know if many noticed that Nakano is slowly getting faster...... (I will probably eat those words later on in the season??)

  9. #39
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Maido View Post
    i don't know if many noticed that Nakano is slowly getting faster......
    Or quicker??

  10. #40
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    So apart from being smaller capacity than the previous class they are also heavier - but faster??
    Quote Originally Posted by Maido View Post
    Quicker NOT faster, there is a difference,
    'Quicker' than, 'Faster' than. A 'Quicker' lap or a 'Faster' lap - buggered if I know?

    Is there even a pedantic difference?

    And if there is - who cares.

    I reckon Rossi will be toooo 'Fast' (or toooo 'Quick') for the rest anyhow.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    19th November 2002 - 08:55
    Bike
    Bikes
    Location
    (hic) Wine (hic) Country
    Posts
    3,037
    So apart from being smaller capacity than the previous class they are also heavier - but faster??
    Quote Originally Posted by Maido View Post
    Quicker NOT faster, there is a difference,
    'Quicker' than, 'Faster' than. A 'Quicker' lap or a 'Faster' lap - buggered if I know?

    Is there even a pedantic difference?

    And if there is - who cares

    I reckon Rossi will be toooo 'Fast' (or toooo 'Quick') for the rest

  12. #42
    Join Date
    11th June 2005 - 14:42
    Bike
    2005 Honda CBR600RR
    Location
    Otahuhu
    Posts
    540
    I think they were saying something like;

    Faster = straight-line.

    Quick = lap time.

    Could be wrong.
    Sleep is for the weak.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    23rd January 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    ninja 250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    5,024
    OK, couple of things, the weight limits have not changed from the 990cc 2006 bikes and the new 800cc 2007 limits. Contrary to popular opinion Honda do not write the rules for MotoGP, thay have a say as a major manufacturer but do not have an over riding vote etc.
    Most paddock opinion suggests that the Ducati since its appereance in MotoGP has had the most powerful engine, again not Honda. Whats your info source, TonyB?
    The main instigator for the change was a backlash after Dajiro Kato's death, suggesting the bikes were getting too powerful. Interestingly since then the electrical and engine management systems have managed to get the bikes way more easier to ride with the ability to limit power in cornesr and under hard acceleration as neccesary. When was the last time you saw a wicked high side? Most accidents now are a lose on the front end on corner entry.
    I reckon though that if a 800 was racing against the 990, the 990 is more likely to win, even if the 800 has a quicker lap time. I'm picking the 990 would still be faster in a straight line and would hold the 800 up in the corners, any advantage that the 800 may hold in higher cornering speed would be negated by the 990 being in its way.

    Oh, 800cc bikes rock.....

  14. #44
    Join Date
    9th August 2005 - 19:52
    Bike
    CBR450RR
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    6,368
    Blog Entries
    77
    Rules are often changed in racing for various reasons. When the rules governing a class change the winner will be the one that can adapt and develop their bike the quickest. That sort of thing takes money. At MotoGP level, we're talking fuck loads on money. Honda has the biggest R&D budget of the lot so they have an advantage straight off.

    It'd be interesting to see if a 2007 990cc could match the 800cc bikes. The main problem with a larger engine is the spinning mass - there's just so much more. That spinning mass fights what the rider wants the bike to do etc. Not only that but the 990cc engines were able to produce more power than the riders could use. With the 800cc bikes the rider can use more throttle more of the time and turn into corners quicker even though they weigh the same as a 990cc.

    gav is right though, a 990 racing an 800 would most likely win because the 800's higher cornering speed advantage is negated if it's stuck behind the 990.
    Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem

    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity

  15. #45
    Join Date
    26th March 2006 - 18:24
    Bike
    TR50 ,AJS500
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    43
    IMO .Marco will be up there,he may not get the title,but you just watch the little wog go.Other than that Rossi will come out fighting from the get go.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •