View Poll Results: Should parents be allowed to smack thier kids?

Voters
106. You may not vote on this poll
  • No children shouldn't be touched it helps nothing

    8 7.55%
  • Yea go ahead wallop the little buggers

    82 77.36%
  • Don't care/Wouldn't stop me from changing ways

    16 15.09%
Page 8 of 20 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 288

Thread: Smacking kids?

  1. #106
    Join Date
    17th May 2003 - 07:12
    Bike
    Il4 and Vtwin
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    1,389
    Who cares smacking is for PC correct wally's. My kids never stopped with a simple smack it was when I beat them senceless that it stopped and then I felt I was in control again . My kids are very curteous when I speak to them. They are very busy and aren't able to visit often but I'm sure they miss me cos I miss having them around .

  2. #107
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    Some kids need a good hiding and some don't. Like dogs - some dogs you never need to hit - a shout and a look is enough. Some need a good wallop to keep em in line. Shouldn't be done with any feeling by you though, a cold calculated measured slap, not a you've pissed me off and I'm having a bad day wallop. Thats bullying.

  3. #108
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 12:00
    Bike
    Old Blue, Little blue
    Location
    31.29.57.11, 116.22.22.22
    Posts
    4,864
    Sp Man - are you sure we have the highest rate of child abuse?
    Not the highest, but its up there with the worst of them - needs to be a whole lot lower!
    “- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”

  4. #109
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by Motoracer View Post
    The rest of your post confuses me. Simply because I don't know enough about the bill or the legislation that the debate is about.
    Go forth and learn.

    Interwebs r teh awesome.
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  5. #110
    Join Date
    21st December 2006 - 07:09
    Bike
    Suzuki GSXR1100 96
    Location
    Wellywood
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by SPman View Post
    Not the highest, but its up there with the worst of them - needs to be a whole lot lower!
    What about Rwanda or does hacking kids up with a machete not count?????
    NEVER LET THE TRUTH GET IN THE WAY OF A GOOD STORY!

  6. #111
    Join Date
    8th October 2006 - 20:21
    Bike
    Purple Vespa 250
    Location
    2nd Star right of Centre
    Posts
    125

    Lightbulb Hardley equatable!

    Quote Originally Posted by Guitana View Post
    What about Rwanda or does hacking kids up with a machete not count?????
    There it is about POWER, and MONEY, TRIBE against TRIBE,WARLORD against ?????, and the GOVT, trying to hold its position:

    Add into that UNEDUCATION,HUNGRY,IMPOVERISHED,???????.

    Not the same thing at all, and certainly not equatable:

    A condom is to keep ones Pipe clean.

  7. #112
    Join Date
    17th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    XB12R, FXR150, Ducati 400ss, 1125CR
    Location
    dam.. i move too much
    Posts
    5,047
    i will smack luke any time i think he needs a wack!.. and some times i will do it just to keep him on his toes!!!
    and all you fuckin tree huggers can get fucked!!
    i do beat him IF he deserves it!!! and if i use a stick.. he had better run faster!!

    hahahahahahahaha


    what a ride so far!!!!

  8. #113
    Join Date
    31st August 2004 - 11:05
    Bike
    No bike It solded
    Location
    Ngatea.....Near Thames
    Posts
    290
    I heard on the News today something that made my blood boil....Sue Bradford was going on about the recent rape case and that the Public should be listened too because a majority of people said that the police are all rapists and need to be brought to justice( or something like that, was too angry to get all of what was said) .....WTF nearly 90 % of the public dont want her to bring in the anti smacking law....is she listening to the Public ....dont think so, And she should apologise to the police for all the spitting, verbal abuse etc etc that went on when she broke the law....I mean come on!.

    Oh and what percentage of the Police force are women ....now we Know for sure that Sue Bradford is a true blood man hater.

  9. #114
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Yep, someone should definitely rape that Bradford women with a PR24, just before they beat her to death with it...

  10. #115
    Join Date
    8th October 2006 - 20:21
    Bike
    Purple Vespa 250
    Location
    2nd Star right of Centre
    Posts
    125

    What and do her a favour!

    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    Yep, someone should definitely rape that Bradford women with a PR24, just before they beat her to death with it...
    Beat her with a BIG MEET STICK:trouble is she in all likelyhood has never had a decent dose of fornication, it would be wasted on her.

    A condom is to keep ones Pipe clean.

  11. #116
    Join Date
    23rd February 2006 - 14:28
    Bike
    Kwakasaurus Z750s '05
    Location
    Crime central.
    Posts
    1,015
    It turns out that Helen Clarke actually thinks that light smacking is acceptable, and that this has been the intention of the bill all along!

    FFS Helen, do you think the country is going to forget that you have been a staunch supporter of Sue Bradford and her bill, and that all involved have stated that the purpose is to completely eliminate smacking?

    Oh, yeah you're right. A lot of kiwis are as stupid as you are dishonest. No doubt you'll come out as the good guy...

  12. #117
    Join Date
    9th October 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    2022 BMW RnineT Pure
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    14,591
    Blog Entries
    3
    Don't forget that Helen originally said she wasn't going to support the bill. Then she did. Now she supports light smacking. Because she's secured the Green Party vote.

    Here's a challenge for you all. Any time you even feel like smacking your kids, ring the cops and dob yourself in. That should keep the courts bound up and the rapists on the street.

    Might stop a few speeding cases making it to court as well. Maybe even keep some drunks on the road.
    If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?



  13. #118
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    I can feel Helen's tounge up my arse, and it doesn't feel good Hell no we're gonna forget this.

  14. #119
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    Putting politics aside for a moment, lets look at what this bill is actually about... our children's wellbeing. I don't think you should have to smack your kids to educate them on what's right and wrong. I was never smacked and I turned out to be an angel.

  15. #120
    Join Date
    16th February 2005 - 14:35
    Bike
    Sold it, what a dumb c@^t
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    46
    Heres my five cents. It is currently illegal to smack anyone, thats assault. Section 59 allows the use of reasonable force for the diciplining of children, if that what you want to do, your not breaking the law under this act. Bradford says that the bill to repel the act is not an "anti smacking bill", but has admitted that once it is repealed smacking for diciplining children will be illegal, but thats not the point of the bill. She is either increadibly stupid or thinks the rest of New Zealand is.

    How ever she has worded the bill and what ever it is suppost to stop it is an anti smacking bill.

    She says that the police will use discretion but she fails to admit that the police will have to investigate any complaints of assault, and lay charges if evidence supports that.

    So depending on which side of the debate that you sit, for or against smacking, this bill is either a very poorly concieved amendment that will do nothing to prevent child abuse and criminilize a large portion on society, or another form of the socilist engineering that continues to pervade NZ under this goverment.

    And before you say that the greens arent part of the goverment, a few years ago steve smarmy mahary attempted to get this moving thru parliment but the pupet master realised how damaging it could be so let it go at the time.

    Now the greens are doing the work again..............

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •