You either miss, or sidestepped my point. It is possible for people to orchestrate the death of others through the use of a firearms (or knife, or joint of frozen meat for that matter). The weapon cannot be held responsible for the outcome.
Only the person can, as they are the only component in the scenario with freewill and autonomy.
Been to Switzerland? Seen the crime rate stats there? Ever come across the wee issue of every house having a gun in it?
To grossly oversimplify it - it's a cultural thing.
No, in NZ the weapon of choice is a car, or arguably the lack of budget for curing prostate cancer or... but that's a whole other argument.
As previously mentioned, it's a cultural thing. Where there is discipline there is control. How many murderous shooting sprees happen in the Army? I really don't know but I'm willing to bet per gun owning head the civilian world has a higher murder/crime rate.
You're right. Pouring more guns in does not address the problem. They are simply going to accentuate the balance of power. Where there is general disorder, there's now going to be armed disorder.
Where there is order and control - there will now be armed order and control.
It IS a people thing.
Bookmarks